On 13/01/2025 12:22, Fabio Valentini wrote:
This isn't new since December 2024, the sq CLI was*never* stable, and
basically every 0.x -> 0.(x+1) release broke some part of the
command-line API. The upstream project made it quite explicit that the
CLI would only be stable going forward after the 1
On 13/01/2025 11:52, Clemens Lang wrote:
I don’t think EPEL can reasonably add stability guarantees that
> upstream does not provide except by pinning a package at an old
> version, but that would mean that EPEL would essentially package
> unsupported software.
That's been the practice so far,
On Пан, 13 сту 2025, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 11:41:07AM +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Пан, 13 сту 2025, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Good Morning Everyone,
>
> We have been emailing daily the following user to notify that the email they
> have set in FAS does not co
On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 10:48:42AM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 01:45:44PM -0800, John Reiser wrote:
> > > A vendor-independent x86-64 psABI
> > > supplement defines four "microachitecture levels": `x86-64-v1` (the
> > > baseline, our code targets this), `x86-64-v2` (+
On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 12:10:44PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 09:11:35AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > First, this would require setting up the infrastructure to build and
> > store and distribute multiple builds of a single version of a
> > package. This
Vitaly Zaitsev wrote:
> > Benchmarks indicate 100–1000 μs.
> > 1 second? I think it's too much.
No, 0.1 to 1 ms or 0.0001 to 0.001 seconds
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedora
On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 12:08:20PM +0100, drago01 wrote:
> On Sunday, January 12, 2025, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> > On 10/01/2025 20:28, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce wrote:
> >
> >> Individual packages can provide already optimized libraries via the
Luya Tshimbalanga venit, vidit, dixit 2025-01-12 22:30:03:
>
> On 2025-01-12 10:58, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Sun, 2025-01-12 at 10:15 -0800, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello team,
> >>
> >> Blender failed to build due to an issue related to Python rules
> >> changes and an addition
Good Morning Everyone,
We have been emailing daily the following user to notify that the email they
have set in FAS does not correspond to a valid bugzilla account.
This is a requirement for Fedora packagers.
Does someone know how to contact them?
pvoborni - emailed since November 19th
pvoborni
On 12/01/2025 20:36, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
I think any massive use of this scheme is unlikely. Note that we'd
want to this only for packages where the optimized code yields
noticeable benefits. There just aren't that many packages which do
significant number crunching_and_ don't alre
On 13/01/2025 01:39, Chris Murphy wrote:
Reported compression ratio is 4.22. Documentation says zbud compression ratio
is fixed at 2:1.
From my laptop using the default zswap-cli.conf:
Pool: 363.71 MiB (3.1% of MemTotal).
Stored: 727.34 MiB (78.9% of SwapUsed).
Compression ratio: 2.00.
Previ
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250112.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250113.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 77
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 32.30 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 09:18:46AM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 12/01/2025 20:36, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > I think any massive use of this scheme is unlikely. Note that we'd
> > want to this only for packages where the optimized code yields
> > noticeable benefits. Ther
Whoops,
here is, https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=127824831
On 2025-01-13 00:17, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Luya Tshimbalanga venit, vidit, dixit 2025-01-12 22:30:03:
On 2025-01-12 10:58, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Sun, 2025-01-12 at 10:15 -0800, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
Hell
Björn Persson wrote:
> Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > And, if there are packages which need to be
> > rebuilt against GCC 15 before the mass rebuild (like packages using Ada),
> > feel free to build them into the side-tag.
>
> I'll start on the Ada packages.
That didn't get far. There seems to be a r
Hi all,
Per the Fedora Linux 42 schedule [1], we will start a mass rebuild for
Fedora 42 on 2025-01-15.
We will be conducting this mass rebuild for the changes listed in:
https://pagure.io/releng/issues?status=Open&tags=mass+rebuild; We have
a tracker at releng for the same, in case of any querie
Hello,
I've been meaning to ask this since the F41 rebuild, but it slipped my mind.
On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 11:28 PM Samyak Jain wrote:
>
> Just so you know, if you need to exclude any packages from the
> rebuild, you can use the PKG_SKIP_LIST or add a noautobuild file to
> the root of your dis
Good Evening.
I hope this email finds you all well. I've been lurking for a bit but
haven't developed the nerve for an introduction until now. By trade I've
been a Linux/Unix Admin with a background in the US Navy, doing work trying
to bring things into the modern age.
Recently, I've taken on more
On Пан, 13 сту 2025, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
Good Morning Everyone,
We have been emailing daily the following user to notify that the email they
have set in FAS does not correspond to a valid bugzilla account.
This is a requirement for Fedora packagers.
Does someone know how to contact them?
Hi David,
> On 13. Jan 2025, at 11:38, David Sommerseth via devel
> wrote:
>
>
> Has something changed in the Fedora EPEL packaging policy in regards to
> package stability?
Just for the record: I’m explicitly not answering this question. I’m also not
the maintainer for sequoia-sq.
> Sinc
V Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 07:28:19PM +, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce
napsal(a):
> Optimized variants of programs and libraries MAY be packaged in a
> separate subpackage. The general packaging rules should be applied,
> i.e. a separate package or packages SHOULD be created if it is files
> ar
* Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 10:13:31AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 08:58:32AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> > * Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
>> >
>> > > glibc
>> >
>> > If we rebuild glibc, should we do a second rebuild into
V Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 07:08:05PM -0500, Neal Gompa napsal(a):
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 4:36 PM Chris Adams wrote:
> >
> > Once upon a time, Neal Gompa said:
> > > For stuff installed into /usr, we
> > > should just allow packages to be optionally built with the higher
> > > microarchitecture le
On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 07:28:19PM +, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce
wrote:
> == Summary ==
> Individual packages can provide already optimized libraries via the
> glibc-hwcaps mechanism. This approach will be extended to executables.
> The package provides an optimized variant of a binary i
On 1/13/25 1:06 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
V Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 07:08:05PM -0500, Neal Gompa napsal(a):
On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 4:36 PM Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Neal Gompa said:
For stuff installed into /usr, we
should just allow packages to be optionally built with the higher
micr
On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 09:11:35AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> First, this would require setting up the infrastructure to build and
> store and distribute multiple builds of a single version of a
> package. This is something that Fedora currently doesn't do, so it'd
> require change
On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 11:41:07AM +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Пан, 13 сту 2025, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > Good Morning Everyone,
> >
> > We have been emailing daily the following user to notify that the email they
> > have set in FAS does not correspond to a valid bugzilla account.
>
On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 12:10:45PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > Third, this choice would be "permanent", i.e. it would be done once at
> > package installation time. If the user tries to boot the same image
> > on different hardware, it might fail. This is inferior to the proposed
> > approach w
On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 07:08:05PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 4:36 PM Chris Adams wrote:
> >
> > Once upon a time, Neal Gompa said:
> > > For stuff installed into /usr, we
> > > should just allow packages to be optionally built with the higher
> > > microarchitecture level
Hi,
Has something changed in the Fedora EPEL packaging policy in regards to
package stability?
Since the updates which has arrived since early December 2024, the
updates to sequoia-sq has twice broken my automated scripts.
The first update which broke my scripts changed --recipient-file to
On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 11:53 AM Clemens Lang wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> > On 13. Jan 2025, at 11:38, David Sommerseth via devel
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> > Has something changed in the Fedora EPEL packaging policy in regards to
> > package stability?
>
> Just for the record: I’m explicitly not answer
On 1/10/25 5:20 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 01:08:38PM -0500, Steve Grubb wrote:
* Verify that audit events exist for user and group creation:
ausearch --start recent -i -m
'ADD_USER,USER_MGMT,USER_CHAUTHTOK,ROLE_ASSIGN,ROLE_REMOVE,DEL_USER,ADD_GROUP,GRP
On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 10:13:31AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 08:58:32AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > * Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
> >
> > > glibc
> >
> > If we rebuild glibc, should we do a second rebuild into your side tag?
>
> Probably… But let's
On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 12:37 PM David Sommerseth wrote:
>
> On 13/01/2025 12:22, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > This isn't new since December 2024, the sq CLI was*never* stable, and
> > basically every 0.x -> 0.(x+1) release broke some part of the
> > command-line API. The upstream project made it qu
Hi!
With the Fedora 42 mass rebuild approaching, I've built gcc 15 snapshot
(and annobin/libtool) in the
f42-build-side-103300
side-tag.
Feel free to do scratch builds against this side-tag if you want
to test whether something builds fine with GCC 15 (David Malcolm has
performed a mass prebuil
On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 01:45:44PM -0800, John Reiser wrote:
> > A vendor-independent x86-64 psABI
> > supplement defines four "microachitecture levels": `x86-64-v1` (the
> > baseline, our code targets this), `x86-64-v2` (+`SSE3`, CentoOS
> > targets this), `x86-64-v3` (+`AVX`), `x86-64-v4` (+`AVX5
On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 12:24 PM Panu Matilainen
wrote:
> On 1/10/25 5:20 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 01:08:38PM -0500, Steve Grubb wrote:
> >> * Verify that audit events exist for user and group creation:
> >> ausearch --start recent -i -m
> >>
> 'AD
I just bumped libgit2 to 1.9.x in rawhide and added a compat package for the old 1.8.x ABI. This should allow seamless switchover to the new ABI without breaking anything that needs 1.8.x. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-44cb6d8bfe If anyone needs 1.9.x for F41 or F40 please let
This email follows week 0.step 3 in the nonresponsive maintainer page:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/
If anyone knows how to contact sham1, please let me know. I've sent an email
to his/her personal email but haven't got a response. The
(CC sham1)
--
Hong
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: h
On Tuesday, January 14th, 2025 at 00:50, Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I've been meaning to ask this since the F41 rebuild, but it slipped my mind.
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 11:28 PM Samyak Jain samyak.j...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > Just so you know, if you need
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> And, if there are packages which need to be
> rebuilt against GCC 15 before the mass rebuild (like packages using Ada),
> feel free to build them into the side-tag.
I'll start on the Ada packages. Some of them may have to wait until
tomorrow.
Björn Persson
pgp9uqtR5SEyp.p
On 2024-12-18 09:17, Michel Lind wrote:
For completeness, this is the infra request
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/12337
To circle back on this, the SIG has now been created and I've started
adding the relevant packages to it. I've also sponsored the folks that
had expressed i
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org
on Matrix.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2025-01-14 17:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
44 matches
Mail list logo
