V Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 07:08:05PM -0500, Neal Gompa napsal(a): > On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 4:36 PM Chris Adams <li...@cmadams.net> wrote: > > > > Once upon a time, Neal Gompa <ngomp...@gmail.com> said: > > > For stuff installed into /usr, we > > > should just allow packages to be optionally built with the higher > > > microarchitecture level in addition to the base one and allow DNF to > > > sort and prefer packages accordingly. > > > > Is this not just resurrecting the old i386/i586/i686 RPM handling? Is > > there a reason not to do it the same way again? > > Not that I know of. The logic is also already kind of there. The > x86_64 arch levels are supported as distinct architectures in RPM with > compatibility detection. openSUSE is already using this facility. > Could you point me to a documentation or an example of the SuSE implementation. So far I only found <https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:X86-64-Architecture-Levels> and <https://news.opensuse.org/2023/03/02/tw-gains-optional-optimizations/> which do not reveal how RPM and Zypper work with the architecture levels.
-- Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
