OLD: Fedora-eln-20241204.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20241205.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 87
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 16
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 344.54 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
Hi Zbyszek,
Thank you for your interest in this proposal!
I'd like to see behaviour where keys for EOL releases are removed as
> soon as possible. I.e. if I have upgraded to F42, but still have a
> package from F39, then keep the key for F39 so that rpm doesn't
> faceplant. But as soon as I remov
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20241203.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20241204.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:5
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 74
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 595.25 KiB
Size of dropped packages
V Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 05:01:38PM +, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce
napsal(a):
> Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ChangeToGitCore
[...]
> == Detailed Description ==
>
> Many package have either requirement or build requirement for the
> `git` binary. The `git` package is comple
On 04/12/2024 09:11, Petr Pisar wrote:
BTW, it seems that "git send-email" is broken in Rawhide: Having installed
git-2.47.1-1.fc42.x86_64 package, the subcommand is not available.
It seems this is because the git package in F41 and rawhide is more or
less equivalent to git-core which is odd i
Hi Petr, thanks for the feedback!
Hau idatzi du Petr Pisar (ppi...@redhat.com) erabiltzaileak (2024 abe.
4(a), az. (10:12)):
>
> V Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 05:01:38PM +, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce
> napsal(a):
> > Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ChangeToGitCore
> [...]
> > ==
Hi Tom,
Hau idatzi du Tom Hughes via devel (devel@lists.fedoraproject.org)
erabiltzaileak (2024 abe. 4(a), az. (10:25)):
>
> On 04/12/2024 09:11, Petr Pisar wrote:
>
> > BTW, it seems that "git send-email" is broken in Rawhide: Having installed
> > git-2.47.1-1.fc42.x86_64 package, the subcommand
On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 11:15:53PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 03. 12. 24 19:43, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce wrote:
> >
> > If we receive enough candidates to hold an election for FESCo, voting
> > will start on Friday 6th December, as per the elections schedule[3].
>
> What about the in
For anyone who is considering running, you can find the interview questions
here https://pagure.io/fedora-pgm/elections-interviews/issue/58
The issue is marked as [Sample Questions] as sometimes the questions do
change, however this is the same set used in the last two elections, with
the only cha
V Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 11:08:43AM +0100, Mikel Olasagasti napsal(a):
> Hau idatzi du Petr Pisar (ppi...@redhat.com) erabiltzaileak (2024 abe.
> > I don't like it: First, any time a subpackage of git adds or moves a
> > subcommand
> > one would have to reevalutate all the reverse dependencies.
> >
On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 05:01:38PM +, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce
wrote:
> Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ChangeToGitCore
> $ grep -E '^BuildRequires:\s*git$' *.spec |cut -d ":" -f1 |sed 's:.spec::'
> 4Pane
> accountsservice
> adobe-mappings-cmap
> adobe-mappings-pdf
...
>
On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 12:50:12PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > === Require on git ===
> >
> >
> > grep -E '^Requires:\s*git$' *.spec |cut -d ":" -f1 |sed 's:.spec::'
>
> Maybe:
> rg -l '^Requires\s*:.*\bgit\b' *.spec | sed -r 's/\.spec$//'
That doesn't work. Improved version
To prevent unwanted dependencies on git from slowly creeping back in, do we
also need an rpmlint check that suggests that git-core might be more
appropriate?
--
Peter Oliver
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe se
Hi Jan,
I support this proposal, it’s a good idea and it will certainly improve the
user experience in this area.
I have one question:
> On 3. Dec 2024, at 18:18, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce
> wrote:
>
> We aim to address customer issues when installing RPM packages from
> repositories
On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 05:18:12PM +, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce
wrote:
> Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Dnf5ExpiredPGPKeys
> The proposed solution is a new LIBDNF5 plugin. This plugin will act as
> a hook, checking for invalid repository PGP keys on the system before
> e
On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 7:38 AM Tyler Fanelli wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm attempting to package the Rust asn1-rs crate. I have a failing build
> here:
>
> https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2330103-rust-asn1-rs/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08335947-rust-asn1-rs/buil
Hello everyone,
My name is Tomas, I'm 23 and newly a part of the nodejs maintainers team at
red hat.
I have been a linux user for almost 8 years now and I'm really happy that I
now have the opportunity to help the project.
I originally started using linux because I have learned you can change ic
On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 10:45 AM Tomas Juhasz wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> My name is Tomas, I'm 23 and newly a part of the nodejs maintainers team at
> red hat.
>
> I have been a linux user for almost 8 years now and I'm really happy that I
> now have the opportunity to help the project.
>
> I
On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 10:52 AM Tomas Juhasz wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> My name is Tomas, I'm 23 and newly a part of the nodejs maintainers team at
> red hat.
>
> I have been a linux user for almost 8 years now and I'm really happy that I
> now have the opportunity to help the project.
>
> I
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-12-04/fedora-coreos-meeting.2024-12-04-16.30.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-12-04/fedora-coreos-meeting.2024-12-04-16.30.txt
Log:
https://meetbot.fedor
Dear all,
While churning through the dependencies for branching `python-b4` for
EPEL 10, I eventually came across python-dkimpy that... turns out to
have been auto-rebuilt since it was first imported. Turns out release
monitoring was never properly configured and we are missing a lot of
intervenin
On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 04:44:23PM +0100, Tomas Juhasz wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> My name is Tomas, I'm 23 and newly a part of the nodejs maintainers team at
> red hat.
>
Welcome! Echoing Stephen, glad to see more people tackling NodeJS
maintenance
Best regards,
--
_o) Michel Lind
_( ) iden
On 11/21/24 17:32, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 21. 11. 24 23:11, William Cohen wrote:
>> Sediment has been designed to work with the RPM build process.
>> Currently, one needs to use modified RPM macros. These can be created
>> quickly by writing the output of the sediment make_sediment_rpmmacros
>>
Hi,
I'd like to give a heads up through this email. I am transitioning to
another team inside Red Hat on January the 1st, and Fedora will no longer
be my primary work responsibility. While I am planning on contributing in
my free time, I won't be able to dedicate as much time to all the bits I've
Hi folks,
I would like to package the grout project into Fedora. It has
a dependency to libecoli which isn't packaged yet, neither.
https://github.com/DPDK/grout
https://github.com/rjarry/libecoli
I have followed the new packager guide here:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maint
Hi all,
The "unicode-ident" crate has a license change in its most recent
versions, from "(MIT OR Apache-2.0) AND Unicode-DFS-2016" to "(MIT OR
Apache-2.0) AND Unicode-3.0".
The Unicode-DFS-2016 and Unicode-3.0 licenses appear to be
functionally equivalent:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archive
26 matches
Mail list logo
