Re: Moving away from the term "karma" in Bodhi

2024-11-22 Thread Arthur G
I blame the Golgafrinchans. On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 at 10:30, Leslie Satenstein via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > I use 3 languages in human speech, and I have in-house three cultures. > When we talk of a person and his actions, we say he has good karma. > Karma is a feeling. Karma

Retiring schroedinger

2024-11-22 Thread Nicolas Chauvet
I'm about to retire schroedinger, a dirac codec implementation. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/schroedinger This project is dead upstream and unused across the whole Fedora collection. (sudo dnf repoquery --requires libschroedinger-1.0.so.0\* outputs nothing) The remaining dirac codec users ar

Re: Retiring schroedinger

2024-11-22 Thread Leigh Scott
It outputs more here. $ sudo dnf4 repoquery --whatrequires 'libschroedinger-1.0.so.0()(64bit)' Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:20 ago on Fri 22 Nov 2024 13:12:34 GMT. libquicktime-0:1.2.4-60.124.20210720git2729591.fc41.x86_64 lives-0:3.2.0-19.fc41.x86_64 schroedinger-devel-0:1.0.11-31.fc41.x8

Re: Retiring schroedinger

2024-11-22 Thread Leigh Scott
$ sudo dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'libschroedinger-1.0.so.0()(64bit)' Updating and loading repositories: Repositories loaded. libquicktime-0:1.2.4-60.124.20210720git2729591.fc41.x86_64 lives-0:3.2.0-19.fc41.x86_64 schroedinger-devel-0:1.0.11-31.fc41.x86_64 vlc-plugins-extra-1:3.0.21-11.fc41.x86_6

Re: Looking for advice on packaging newer version of ncdu

2024-11-22 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 12:29:26PM +, Richard Fearn wrote: > Hi all, > > ncdu is a text-mode disk usage analyzer: https://dev.yorhel.nl/ncdu > > I maintain the ncdu package in Fedora ( > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ncdu) which is currently ncdu 1.x > (written in C). > > There's a new

Re: Looking for advice on packaging newer version of ncdu

2024-11-22 Thread Mikel Olasagasti
Hi Clemens, Hau idatzi du Clemens Lang (cll...@redhat.com) erabiltzaileak (2024 aza. 22(a), or. (13:46)): > > Hi, > > > On 22. Nov 2024, at 13:29, Richard Fearn wrote: > > > > There's a new Zig version (2.x) which I would like to also package. 2.x is > > being advertised as the "main" version th

Re: Retiring schroedinger

2024-11-22 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Friday, 22 November 2024 at 14:16, Leigh Scott wrote: > $ sudo dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'libschroedinger-1.0.so.0()(64bit)' > Updating and loading repositories: > Repositories loaded. > libquicktime-0:1.2.4-60.124.20210720git2729591.fc41.x86_64 > lives-0:3.2.0-19.fc41.x86_64 Dirac codec sup

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

2024-11-22 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
= # #meeting:fedoraproject.org: ELN = Meeting started by @yselkowitz:fedora.im at 2024-11-22 17:01:29 Meeting summary --- * TOPIC: Init process (@yselkowitz:fedora.im, 17:01:52) * TOPIC: Agenda (@yselkowitz:fed

libarrow (Apache Arrow) SONAME bump in rawhide

2024-11-22 Thread Kaleb Keithley
Arrow packages include libarrow*.rpm parquet*.rpm (libparquet*), and python-pyarrow*.rpm Updating to Arrow 18.0.0 side-tag f42-build-side-100844 has been created for rebuilding the dependent packages: * ceph (for which I am the maintainer) * gdal (maintainer cc'd) Are there any others? -- K

Re: pkcs11-provider update breaks eduroam

2024-11-22 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Wed, Nov 20 2024 at 04:03:27 PM +01:00:00, Clemens Lang wrote: That was the case with openssl-pkcs11 (the package that contains the OpenSSL PKCS#11 ENGINE) for years. The use of PKCS#11 tokens is not very common. I don’t think it’s too much to ask to install an additional package if you want

Re: protobuf: too old and too new, how to move forward?

2024-11-22 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 22. 11. 24 17:14, Paul Wouters wrote: Hi, There seems to be an issue that is stalled with respect to the protobuf version packaged in fedora: See https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/protobuf/pull-request/28 Updating it breaks stuff, but keeping it at the current old version also breaks stuf

Re: Retiring schroedinger

2024-11-22 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 22. 11. 24 13:15, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: This project is dead upstream... Or is it alive? (Apologies, I could not resist.) -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 Fedora Matrix: mhroncok -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: protobuf: too old and too new, how to move forward?

2024-11-22 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2024-11-22 at 11:14 -0500, Paul Wouters wrote: > Hi, > > There seems to be an issue that is stalled with respect to the protobuf > version packaged in fedora: > > See https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/protobuf/pull-request/28 > > Updating it breaks stuff, but keeping it at the current o

Re: protobuf: too old and too new, how to move forward?

2024-11-22 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Fri, 2024-11-22 at 17:23 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 22. 11. 24 17:14, Paul Wouters wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > There seems to be an issue that is stalled with respect to the > > protobuf > > version packaged in fedora: > > > > See https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/protobuf/pull-request/2

systemd unit access to /etc/shadow

2024-11-22 Thread Jesse Crawford
Hello all, I package kanidm for Fedora in a COPR for my own use. kanidm is an identity management solution. In the most recent version, the kanidm-unixd client was enhanced to be able to perform authentication against the system files as well. This has various advantages (e.g. ability to annotat

Fedora eln compose report: 20241123.n.0 changes

2024-11-22 Thread Fedora ELN Report
OLD: Fedora-eln-20241122.n.0 NEW: Fedora-eln-20241123.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 16 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:17.41 KiB Size of

Re: Looking for advice on packaging newer version of ncdu

2024-11-22 Thread Benson Muite
On 22/11/2024 3.54 pm, Mikel Olasagasti wrote: > Hi Clemens, > > Hau idatzi du Clemens Lang (cll...@redhat.com) erabiltzaileak (2024 > aza. 22(a), or. (13:46)): >> >> Hi, >> >>> On 22. Nov 2024, at 13:29, Richard Fearn wrote: >>> >>> There's a new Zig version (2.x) which I would like to also pack

Re: Looking for advice on packaging newer version of ncdu

2024-11-22 Thread Vascom
May be just update it to new version? пт, 22 нояб. 2024 г. в 15:30, Richard Fearn : > > Hi all, > > ncdu is a text-mode disk usage analyzer: https://dev.yorhel.nl/ncdu > > I maintain the ncdu package in Fedora > (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ncdu) which is currently ncdu 1.x > (written in

Looking for advice on packaging newer version of ncdu

2024-11-22 Thread Richard Fearn
Hi all, ncdu is a text-mode disk usage analyzer: https://dev.yorhel.nl/ncdu I maintain the ncdu package in Fedora ( https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ncdu) which is currently ncdu 1.x (written in C). There's a new Zig version (2.x) which I would like to also package. 2.x is being advertised as

protobuf: too old and too new, how to move forward?

2024-11-22 Thread Paul Wouters
Hi, There seems to be an issue that is stalled with respect to the protobuf version packaged in fedora: See https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/protobuf/pull-request/28 Updating it breaks stuff, but keeping it at the current old version also breaks stuff. One solution is to create two versions

Re: Looking for advice on packaging newer version of ncdu

2024-11-22 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 12:29:26PM +, Richard Fearn wrote: > ncdu is a text-mode disk usage analyzer: https://dev.yorhel.nl/ncdu > > There's a new Zig version (2.x) which I would like to also package. 2.x is > being advertised as the "main" version these days (whereas the 1.x C > version is de

Re: Looking for advice on packaging newer version of ncdu

2024-11-22 Thread Clemens Lang
Hi, > On 22. Nov 2024, at 13:29, Richard Fearn wrote: > > There's a new Zig version (2.x) which I would like to also package. 2.x is > being advertised as the "main" version these days (whereas the 1.x C version > is described as "LTS" and "Lags a bit behind on the 2.x version"). So it > feel