OpenSSL performance tuning Webinar

2024-07-23 Thread Dmitry Belyavskiy
Dear colleagues, OpenSSL has announced the performance tuning webinar on August 1 https://openssl.org/blog/blog/2024/07/18/August-Webinar/ Feel free to register and join -- Dmitry Belyavskiy -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora rawhide (to be f41) and openssl engines

2024-07-23 Thread Clemens Lang
Hi, > On 22. Jul 2024, at 20:42, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > At this point, this sounds like the best approach. > The problem is well understood and the build failures are trivially > resolved by adding a single BuildRequires line or a single define. > > If we start changing thing

Re: Fedora Mass Rebuild 41 has completed

2024-07-23 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 11:32:03PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 01:19:27AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 23. 07. 24 1:07, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > I noticed the following when comparing packages after the rebuild: > > > > > > │ │ │ > > >

Re: [Java related] packaging Italian ID card middleware

2024-07-23 Thread Julian Sikorski
Am 22.07.24 um 22:53 schrieb Kevin Kofler via devel: Julian Sikorski wrote: Germany uses their own implementation too: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/AusweisApp2 To add insult to injury, it requires the use of custom EC curves, which are bound to stop working at any moment: https://bugzilla.

Re: [Java related] packaging Italian ID card middleware

2024-07-23 Thread Petr Pisar
V Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 12:15:39PM +0200, Julian Sikorski napsal(a): > Am 22.07.24 um 22:53 schrieb Kevin Kofler via devel: > > Julian Sikorski wrote: > > > Germany uses their own implementation too: > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/AusweisApp2 > > > To add insult to injury, it requires the

Schedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2024-07-23)

2024-07-23 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org on Matrix. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2024-07-23 17:00 UTC' Links to all issues to be

[Test-Announce]Fedora 41 Rawhide 20240723.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

2024-07-23 Thread rawhide
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 41 Rawhide 20240723.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: F42 Change Proposal: Enable Drm Panic (system-wide)

2024-07-23 Thread Jocelyn Falempe
Hi, It's no longer necessary to disable VT_CONSOLE to enable DRM_PANIC. So I have updated the wiki page, and also moved it to self-contained-change, as there are no more system-wide impact by enabling DRM_PANIC. I've also made a new kernel build, with VT_CONSOLE and DRM_PANIC enabled, so you

Re: F42 Change Proposal: Enable Drm Panic (system-wide)

2024-07-23 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 8:32 AM Jocelyn Falempe wrote: > > Hi, > > It's no longer necessary to disable VT_CONSOLE to enable DRM_PANIC. > So I have updated the wiki page, and also moved it to > self-contained-change, as there are no more system-wide impact by > enabling DRM_PANIC. > > I've also mad

Re: F42 Change Proposal: Enable Drm Panic (system-wide)

2024-07-23 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Jocelyn Falempe said: > It's no longer necessary to disable VT_CONSOLE to enable DRM_PANIC. > So I have updated the wiki page, and also moved it to > self-contained-change, as there are no more system-wide impact by > enabling DRM_PANIC. Thanks for the additional work on this. -

Re: libarrow (Apache Arrow) SONAME bump in rawhide

2024-07-23 Thread Kaleb Keithley
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 1:24 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2024-04-23 at 10:15 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Mon, 2024-04-22 at 11:04 -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > > Coming soon. > > > > > > Updating to Arrow 16.0.0 > > > > Thanks for the minimal notice, but that is not how this i

Re: Flaws detected by static analyzers in Fedora 41 Critical Path Packages

2024-07-23 Thread Siteshwar Vashisht
On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 2:28 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 01:37:20PM +0200, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote: > > I request somebody from the tools team to comment on these concerns. We only > > report the defects identified by gcc, clang etc. > > You wrote: > > > TLDR: This r

Maintainer of kata-containers

2024-07-23 Thread Emanuel Lima
I would like to become the official and only maintainer of kata-containers as etrunko (Eduardo Lima) has been non responsive to me and has left Red Hat (as far as I know). Does anyone know how I should proceed or who should I contact? Thanks in advance. -- Kind Regards, Emanuel Lima Software

Re: libarrow (Apache Arrow) SONAME bump in rawhide

2024-07-23 Thread Stephen Smoogen
On Tue, 23 Jul 2024 at 08:59, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 1:24 PM Adam Williamson > wrote: >> >> On Tue, 2024-04-23 at 10:15 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >> > On Mon, 2024-04-22 at 11:04 -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote: >> > > Coming soon. >> > > >> > > Updating to Arrow 1

Re: Maintainer of kata-containers

2024-07-23 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
On 7/23/24 09:04, Emanuel Lima wrote: I would like to become the official and only maintainer of kata-containers as etrunko (Eduardo Lima) has been non responsive to me and has left Red Hat (as far as I know). Does anyone know how I should proceed or who should I contact? https://docs.fedorap

How to make the rpminspect test required to pass Zuul CI?

2024-07-23 Thread Jun Aruga (he / him)
Hello, Currently the rpminspect test is executed as non-voting in Zuul CI.[1] I want to change the setting to make rpminspect required to pass the Zuul CI on the rpms/rubygem-mysql2 dist-git repository. Could you tell me how to do it? Thanks. [1] https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/b

Re: How to make the rpminspect test required to pass Zuul CI?

2024-07-23 Thread Cristian Le via devel
On the dist-git I don't think there is any. For bodhi though you can make `gating.yaml` file. Here [1] is one which includes `rpminspect` ```yaml --- !Policy product_versions:   - fedora-* decision_contexts:   - bodhi_update_push_stable subject_type: koji_build rules:   - !PassingTestCaseRule {t

Re: How to make the rpminspect test required to pass Zuul CI?

2024-07-23 Thread Aleksandra Fedorova
Hi, On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 4:18 PM Jun Aruga (he / him) wrote: > Hello, > > Currently the rpminspect test is executed as non-voting in Zuul CI.[1] > I want to change the setting to make rpminspect required to pass the > Zuul CI on the rpms/rubygem-mysql2 dist-git repository. > Could you tell me

Re: Maintainer of kata-containers

2024-07-23 Thread Eduardo Lima (Etrunko)
Hi Emanuel, Although I've left RH, I'm still active on email. I'm sorry if I missed any messages you tried sending me, but I couldn't find any from you in my inbox, until today. On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 10:05 AM Emanuel Lima wrote: > I would like to become the official and only maintainer of k

List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in 1 week

2024-07-23 Thread Miro Hrončok
Dear maintainers. Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages should be retired from Fedora 41 approximately one week before branching. 5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happen approximately in 1 week, i.e. around 2024-07-30. Policy: h

Re: Maintainer of kata-containers

2024-07-23 Thread Eduardo Lima (Etrunko)
There you go, I've promoted you to admin role on the project. On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 11:28 AM Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) wrote: > Hi Emanuel, > > Although I've left RH, I'm still active on email. I'm sorry if I missed > any messages you tried sending me, but I couldn't find any from you in my > inb

Re: How to make the rpminspect test required to pass Zuul CI?

2024-07-23 Thread Aleksandra Fedorova
Hi, On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 4:26 PM Cristian Le via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On the dist-git I don't think there is any. For bodhi though you can > make `gating.yaml` file. Here [1] is one which includes `rpminspect` > > ```yaml > --- !Policy > product_versions: >- fedo

Re: Fedora rawhide (to be f41) and openssl engines

2024-07-23 Thread Gary Buhrmaster
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 8:55 AM Clemens Lang wrote: > However, we should still consider the effect this will have on developers > that build software on Fedora — they will also have to specify > -DOPENSSL_NO_ENGINE now or see failing builds, and we don’t really see that > impact until 41 relea

Re: Fedora rawhide (to be f41) and openssl engines

2024-07-23 Thread Clemens Lang
Hi, > On 23. Jul 2024, at 16:36, Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 8:55 AM Clemens Lang wrote: > >> However, we should still consider the effect this will have on developers >> that build software on Fedora — they will also have to specify >> -DOPENSSL_NO_ENGINE now or see f

Re: Fedora rawhide (to be f41) and openssl engines

2024-07-23 Thread Stephen Smoogen
On Tue, 23 Jul 2024 at 11:02, Clemens Lang wrote: > > Hi, > > > On 23. Jul 2024, at 16:36, Gary Buhrmaster > > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 8:55 AM Clemens Lang wrote: > > > >> However, we should still consider the effect this will have on developers > >> that build software on Fedor

Re: Fedora rawhide (to be f41) and openssl engines

2024-07-23 Thread Joe Orton
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 10:54:12AM +0200, Clemens Lang wrote: > However, we should still consider the effect this will have on > developers that build software on Fedora — they will also have to > specify -DOPENSSL_NO_ENGINE now or see failing builds, and we don’t > really see that impact until

Re: Maintainer of kata-containers

2024-07-23 Thread Emanuel Lima
Thanks Eduardo. I wasn't aware of your gmail account. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/cod

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2024-07-23)

2024-07-23 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Text Log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-07-23/fesco.2024-07-23-17.00.log.txt HTML Log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-07-23/fesco.2024-07-23-17.00.log.html Text Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_m

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20240723.n.0 changes/updates

2024-07-23 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Hi everyone. The mass rebuild finished yesterday and after some untagging and restarting composes, the rawhide compose finished. For the next 2 weeks, You can see the report at: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20240723.n.0/logs/changelog-Fedora-Rawhide

[Heads up]: python-PyGithub major update coming to rawhide soon

2024-07-23 Thread Sandro via devel
Hi, PyGithub will be updated to 2.3.0 in rawhide soon. This is a major update and according to upstream's changelog [1] it comes with breaking changes. The first update containing breaking changes is 1.59.0. We are currently on 1.58.2. Please take a look yourself if it affects your package.

RPM build warning

2024-07-23 Thread Steve Dickson
Hello I've got the following warning RPM build warnings: source_date_epoch_from_changelog set but %changelog is missing The spec file definitely has a %changelog section. What is it the warning about? tia, steved. -- ___ devel mailing list -- d

Re: RPM build warning

2024-07-23 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 04:31:31PM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: > Hello > > I've got the following warning > > RPM build warnings: > source_date_epoch_from_changelog set but %changelog is missing > > The spec file definitely has a %changelog section. > What is it the warning about? What pack

Re: RPM build warning

2024-07-23 Thread Steve Dickson
On 7/23/24 4:36 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 04:31:31PM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: Hello I've got the following warning RPM build warnings: source_date_epoch_from_changelog set but %changelog is missing The spec file definitely has a %changelog sectio

Re: RPM build warning

2024-07-23 Thread Elliott Sales de Andrade
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 4:56 PM Steve Dickson wrote: > On 7/23/24 4:36 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 04:31:31PM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: > >> Hello > >> > >> I've got the following warning > >> > >> RPM build warnings: > >> source_date_epoch_from_change

Review swaps once again.

2024-07-23 Thread Peter Lemenkov
Hello All! I've got a few packages waiting for review and I am willing to review yours in return. First I have two Erlang-related packages. Both passes unit-tests, builds just fine, * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2299556 - erlang-gpb, a modern Google Protobuf compiler for Erlang. * https://bugzill

Re: Schedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2024-07-23)

2024-07-23 Thread Kevin Kofler via devel
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > #3244 Change: Retire Python 2.7 > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3244 > APPROVED (+8, 0, 0) This is going to break the build of a whole bunch of compatibility packages, which will in turn break a lot of software in Fedora. Do you expect packages to do what Qt5

Re: Schedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2024-07-23)

2024-07-23 Thread Kevin Kofler via devel
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > #3242 Change: Opt-In Metrics for Fedora Workstation > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3242 > APPROVED (+6, 0, 0) And this one is yet another case of FESCo rubberstamping a change without even any dissenting vote despite loads of negative mailing list feedback. I

Re: Schedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2024-07-23)

2024-07-23 Thread Josh Boyer
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024, 6:38 PM Kevin Kofler via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > #3242 Change: Opt-In Metrics for Fedora Workstation > > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3242 > > APPROVED (+6, 0, 0) > > And this one is yet another case of FESCo rub

Re: Schedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2024-07-23)

2024-07-23 Thread Gary Buhrmaster
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 10:30 PM Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > #3244 Change: Retire Python 2.7 > > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3244 > > APPROVED (+8, 0, 0) > > This is going to break the build of a whole bunch of compatibility packages, > which will in

Re: Schedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2024-07-23)

2024-07-23 Thread Gary Buhrmaster
On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 12:23 AM Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > I believe qt5-qtwebkit uses python3 for builds > (I believe the qt4 variant does use python2, > but a quick repoquery indicates no fedora > package depends on qtwebkit-devel, although > I admit the query may have been wrong, > and I think

Re: RPM build warning

2024-07-23 Thread Steve Dickson
On 7/23/24 5:04 PM, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 4:56 PM Steve Dickson wrote: On 7/23/24 4:36 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 04:31:31PM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: Hello I've got the following warning RPM build warnings: sou

Re: Schedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2024-07-23)

2024-07-23 Thread Gary Buhrmaster
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 10:38 PM Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > And this one is yet another case of FESCo rubberstamping a change without > even any dissenting vote despite loads of negative mailing list feedback. How can one determine "loads"? Since the feedback itself is opt-in, no statistic

Re: Schedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2024-07-23)

2024-07-23 Thread Kevin Kofler via devel
Am Mittwoch, 24. Juli 2024 02:41:12 CEST schrieb Gary Buhrmaster: And, FWIW, it appears that qtwebkit has been FTBFS since F39, so qtwebkit could end up being a moot point. It built fine in the F39 mass rebuild, only started failing in the F40 one. So it is NOT in the list of packages to be re

Re: Schedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2024-07-23)

2024-07-23 Thread Kevin Kofler via devel
Am Mittwoch, 24. Juli 2024 02:52:44 CEST schrieb Gary Buhrmaster: On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 10:38 PM Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: And this one is yet another case of FESCo rubberstamping a change without even any dissenting vote despite loads of negative mailing list feedback. How can one det

Re: [Heads up]: python-PyGithub major update coming to rawhide soon

2024-07-23 Thread Sandro via devel
On 23-07-2024 20:30, Sandro via devel wrote: PyGithub will be updated to 2.3.0 in rawhide soon. This is a major update and according to upstream's changelog [1] it comes with breaking changes. The first update containing breaking changes is 1.59.0. We are currently on 1.58.2. Please take a lo

Re: [Java related] packaging Italian ID card middleware

2024-07-23 Thread Björn Persson
Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > And at least the German stuff (and the Italian, Portuguese, and Estonian > ones) is Free Software. The Austrian ID Austria app is entirely proprietary. > Though, as far as I know, you can buy physical FIDO2 hardware, then go > register that with the ID Austria off