On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 10:54:12AM +0200, Clemens Lang wrote: > However, we should still consider the effect this will have on > developers that build software on Fedora — they will also have to > specify -DOPENSSL_NO_ENGINE now or see failing builds, and we don’t > really see that impact until 41 releases.
Yup, exactly. This is only a bad outcome and will be seen (correctly) by upstream projects as Fedora shipping a broken OpenSSL when we start wasting their time with people filing "I couldn't build on Fedora" bug reports. The time Fedora maintainers have spent on this is a sunk cost, doing nothing is clearly inferior to all other options. At minimum we should ship F41 with openssl-devel Requires: openssl-engine-devel again. (Having OpenSSL <configuration.h> #define OPENSSL_NO_ENGINE properly is by far my preferred option) Regards, Joe -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
