The current Fedora Rawhide kernels are too slow to run libguestfs
tests when doing Koji builds. These run in a qemu VM, running the
Rawhide kernel, emulated using software virtualization (ie. TCG).
They now time out because these kernels are so slow. Until fairly
recently they were slow but worki
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220723.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220724.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 60
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 1010.54 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 8:58 AM Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> Il sab 23 lug 2022, 19:12 Adam Williamson ha
> scritto:
>
>> This of course begs a question: did qemu also have a non-static pcre
>> requirement at the time? But it seems not:
>>
>> [adamw@xps13k qemu (f36 %)]$ git show 0835325:qemu.spec
Hi all,
As part of building ODE 0.16, ode's soname has been bumped from
libode.so.4/libode-double.so.4 to libode.so.8/libode-double.so.8.
This package is now built as part of Fedora 37 Mass Rebuild, so we
expect all dependent packages to be automatically built again during
this process.
W
Kalev Lember wrote on 2022/07/24 22:42:
On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 8:58 AM Paolo Bonzini wrote:
glib2 switched to pcre2 in rawhide recently. Can you check if qemu needs to
be updated for that now so that it BuildRequires pcre2-static instead?
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/glib2/c/34b203d
On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 4:45 PM Mamoru TASAKA
wrote:
> Kalev Lember wrote on 2022/07/24 22:42:
> > glib2 switched to pcre2 in rawhide recently. Can you check if qemu needs
> to
> > be updated for that now so that it BuildRequires pcre2-static instead?
> >
> >
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/
On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 4:41 PM Hedayat Vatankhah
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As part of building ODE 0.16, ode's soname has been bumped from
> libode.so.4/libode-double.so.4 to libode.so.8/libode-double.so.8.
>
> This package is now built as part of Fedora 37 Mass Rebuild, so we expect
> all dependent
On 22/07/24 06:05PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
> If ODE 0.16 was only built as part of the mass rebuild and wasn't
> available in the buildroot during the mass rebuild (and I don't think
> it was), then all the other packages that depend on it were still
> built against the older ODE 0.14 version as part
On Tue, 2022-07-19 at 16:47 +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> V Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 01:47:12PM +, Globe Trotter via devel napsal(a):
> > However, I get the following error in the build log (of koji):
> >
> >
> >
> > checking whether the C compiler works... no
> > configure: error: in `/builddir/bu
On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 2:01 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 7:47 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > - the sets of dependent packages overlap between concurrently created side
> > tags
>
> So what? If we're not tracking rebuilds in Git anymore, this is no
> longer a serious probl
On 7/24/22 16:40, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
Hi all,
As part of building ODE 0.16, ode's soname has been bumped from
libode.so.4/libode-double.so.4 to libode.so.8/libode-double.so.8.
This package is now built as part of Fedora 37 Mass Rebuild, so we expect all dependent
packages to be automat
11 matches
Mail list logo
