On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 4:45 PM Mamoru TASAKA <mtas...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Kalev Lember wrote on 2022/07/24 22:42: > > glib2 switched to pcre2 in rawhide recently. Can you check if qemu needs > to > > be updated for that now so that it BuildRequires pcre2-static instead? > > > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/glib2/c/34b203d5499b579c68b4f923a29fd417efdd9637?branch=rawhide > > > > Ah... maybe due to this? > > A. > On mass-rebuid, rubygem-glib2 (which is a wrapper to glib2 for ruby > language) sees > test failure with regards to "g_regex_match_all" - note that this is s390x > only. > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=89955927 > > B. > I got lxrandr behavior regression on rawhide: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2109187 > > - what lxrandr does here is lxrander gets the result of "xrandr" and > passes it to "g_regex_match". > On F-36 actually "g_regex_match" matches but (while I have not tried > yet) > what bug reporter says must be that "g_regex_match" now fails with > rawhide glib2 (this is happening on x86_64). > > I will recheck this tomorrow. > Those both sound a lot like regressions in g_regex_match() to me. If you have time, any chance you could create smaller reproducers and file issues for these upstream at https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib ? -- Thanks, Kalev
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure