On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 4:45 PM Mamoru TASAKA <mtas...@fedoraproject.org>
wrote:

> Kalev Lember wrote on 2022/07/24 22:42:
> > glib2 switched to pcre2 in rawhide recently. Can you check if qemu needs
> to
> > be updated for that now so that it BuildRequires pcre2-static instead?
> >
> >
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/glib2/c/34b203d5499b579c68b4f923a29fd417efdd9637?branch=rawhide
> >
>
> Ah... maybe due to this?
>
> A.
> On mass-rebuid, rubygem-glib2 (which is a wrapper to glib2 for ruby
> language) sees
> test failure with regards to "g_regex_match_all" - note that this is s390x
> only.
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=89955927
>
> B.
> I got lxrandr behavior regression on rawhide:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2109187
>
> - what lxrandr does here is lxrander gets the result of "xrandr" and
>    passes it to "g_regex_match".
>    On F-36 actually "g_regex_match" matches but (while I have not tried
> yet)
>    what bug reporter says must be that "g_regex_match" now fails with
>    rawhide glib2 (this is happening on x86_64).
>
> I will recheck this tomorrow.
>

Those both sound a lot like regressions in g_regex_match() to me. If you
have time, any chance you could create smaller reproducers and file issues
for these upstream at https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib ?

-- 
Thanks,
Kalev
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to