Has a bug been filed against subversion (and other low-lying deps) yet?
(I could not see any bug and wondering why not?)
Naively it looks like the filed bugs are more targeting higher dependent
packages which is less useful.
I think it is the immediate dependencies like subversion (and possibly so
On 13. 07. 22 8:58, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
Has a bug been filed against subversion (and other low-lying deps) yet?
(I could not see any bug and wondering why not?)
Yes and it has been fixed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103909
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: m
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-36-20220712.0):
ID: 1323539 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220712.0):
ID: 1323555 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On 7/13/22 09:10, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 13. 07. 22 8:58, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
Has a bug been filed against subversion (and other low-lying deps) yet?
The bugs were filled agaisnt all native direct depndencies of java(-devel) and
against all transitive depndencies of java, which are d
Hi All!
On 7/6/22 01:24, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 06. 07. 22 1:17, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 06. 07. 22 0:14, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
Stephen Smoogen wrote:
Hyperbole aside, it isn't a joke. Looking at the chain we see a common
If mesa's i686 support should be removed, then this proposal
On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 08:52:28AM -0500, Kate Stewart wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 6:02 AM Josh Boyer
> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 12:34 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > >
> > > Dne 08. 07. 22 v 4:59 Stewart Smith via devel napsal(a):
> > >
> > > Another - what do we do about, e.g., F
On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 06:34:16PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 08. 07. 22 v 4:59 Stewart Smith via devel napsal(a):
> > > Another - what do we do about, e.g., Fedora IoT and Fedora CoreOS,
> > > which have their own somewhat different release/life cycles? What about
> > > module lifecycles?
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220712.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220713.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 119
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 3.69 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Hello folks,
I am a software engineer who has worked mainly in startups. I have made
very few contributions to some free/open source software, but that will be
changing :) I just created a package review(
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106699) it is about a new
package with aiokafka.
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 2:46 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2022-07-11 at 07:02 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 12:34 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > >
> > > Dne 08. 07. 22 v 4:59 Stewart Smith via devel napsal(a):
> > >
> > > Another - what do we do about, e.g., Fedora I
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 6:29 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 06:34:16PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > Dne 08. 07. 22 v 4:59 Stewart Smith via devel napsal(a):
> > > > Another - what do we do about, e.g., Fedora IoT and Fedora CoreOS,
> > > > which have their ow
Hi folks,
I'm sure this exists somewhere but I couldn't find one, so with the help
of folks on #fedora-devel, I hacked up this simple shell script to get
the all the deps of a package. It's useful when your package update
includes a soname bump, and you need to figure out what packages need to
be
On Wed, 2022-07-13 at 14:19 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm sure this exists somewhere but I couldn't find one,
(IMHO) The script that give really all deps is
find_unblocked_orphans.py from
https://pagure.io/releng/blob/main/f/scripts/find_unblocked_orphans.py
, you can use it with
On Fri, 01 Jul 2022 11:56:38 -
"Artur Frenszek-Iwicki" wrote:
> Blueman, the bluetooth manager [0], requires the user to be in the
> "wheel" group in order to perform certain functions (like
> enabling/disabling bluetooth). This leads to a sub-optimal user
> experience, where the user is prom
On 7/11/22 Marius Schwarz wrote:
I have just create(d/ not finished yet, started 15 minutes ago) a ~2.5 GB rpm
and found, that rpmbuild is an extrem bottleneck.
IMHO, this is caused by a fileread function which reads files in 32k blocks,
which is very slow and extrem IO intensive. The result
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 16/239 (x86_64), 31/167 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220712.n.0):
ID: 1323573 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_
On 22/07/13 02:19PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm sure this exists somewhere but I couldn't find one, so with the help
> of folks on #fedora-devel, I hacked up this simple shell script to get
> the all the deps of a package. It's useful when your package update
> includes a soname bump,
Bodhi is a nice interface to create multi-builds update from side-tags,
but it is not really optimized for massive updates. In the past we had
some troubles pushing updates with a lot of builds. There are too many
things done in the background that can break while processing a massive
update and ma
On Wed, 2022-07-13 at 15:38 +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> Bodhi is a nice interface to create multi-builds update from side-tags,
> but it is not really optimized for massive updates. In the past we had
> some troubles pushing updates with a lot of builds. There are too many
> things done
Maxwell G via devel writes:
> I believe Miro uses this for the FTI bugs. It tends to be more accurate,
> especially when there hasn't been a compose for a couple days. If this
> is something people are interested in, I think it's worthwhile to
> include this repo definition in fedora-packager.
A
Hi All,
QATlib 22.07 (https://github.com/intel/qatlib) is going to be released
in about 2 weeks.
This will include a soversion bump (from 2 to 3).
I can rebuild the dependent packages (qatlib and qatengine) once qatlib
is be updated.
Regards,
--
Giovanni
___
On Wed, 13 Jul 2022 at 18:13, Robbie Harwood wrote:
>
> Maxwell G via devel writes:
>
> > I believe Miro uses this for the FTI bugs. It tends to be more accurate,
> > especially when there hasn't been a compose for a couple days. If this
> > is something people are interested in, I think it's wor
Jul 13, 2022 10:45:02 AM Mattia Verga via devel :
> Meanwhile I'll keep an eye on the recent massive Golang update (which
> carries 315 builds...) to see if it shows any hiccups. (I'm quite
> surprised it didn't screw up already)
The recent 315 build F35 Bodhi update is not the first one that I'v
On Wed, 13 Jul 2022 at 12:25, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jul 2022 at 18:13, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> >
> > Maxwell G via devel writes:
> >
> > > I believe Miro uses this for the FTI bugs. It tends to be more
> accurate,
> > > especially when there hasn't been a compose for a couple days. If
Hello,
Thanks for that---some really useful bits in there that I wasn't aware
of.
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 10:09:10 -0500, Maxwell G wrote:
> I don't think you need to do all of this. With
>
> ```
> sudo dnf repoquery --repo=rawhide -q --whatrequires dcmtk | xargs sudo dnf
> repoquery --repo=rawhid
On Wed, 13 Jul 2022 at 18:43, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, 13 Jul 2022 at 12:25, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 13 Jul 2022 at 18:13, Robbie Harwood wrote:
>> >
>> > Maxwell G via devel writes:
>> >
>> > > I believe Miro uses this for the FTI bugs. It tends to be more accurate,
>> >
On 6/30/22 10:23, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
I take a pretty dim view towards arguments about "Flathub is
untrusted" and "Flathub packaging is poor" since proponents of these
arguments conveniently ignore the fact that traditional RPMs are
totally unsandboxed. [...]
Opponents of Flatpak have ha
On 22/07/13 08:58AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> It's also where we usually route *manual* testing feedback. If people
> can't comment and karma a Bodhi update, where can they test this big
> and very-potentially-destabilizing change?
The go rebuilds in question are not very destabilizing, and they d
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 7:32 PM Maxwell G via devel
wrote:
>
> On 22/07/13 08:58AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > It's also where we usually route *manual* testing feedback. If people
> > can't comment and karma a Bodhi update, where can they test this big
> > and very-potentially-destabilizing chang
On 22/07/13 05:35PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > This is what we (I) aren't sure of, and that's why I first obtain the
> capabilities manually and then query for them. If someone can confirm
> that this is indeed the case, that would certainly simplify things.
Here is confirmation:
```
sudo dnf repoqu
On 22/07/13 07:49PM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> I wonder if it would have made sense to have submitted those 300+
> builds in separate bodhi updates (at least in several smaller batches,
> if not individually)?
> At least in this case, that would've been a little bit more work, but
> would have caus
On Wed, 2022-07-13 at 19:49 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 7:32 PM Maxwell G via devel
> wrote:
> >
> > On 22/07/13 08:58AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > It's also where we usually route *manual* testing feedback. If people
> > > can't comment and karma a Bodhi update, wh
Hi Fedora Devs,
Would someone be able to help getting an official-respin done from F36
latest please? Similar to what was done for the Carbons etc.
We need one for the Z13 & Z16 preload. We're waiting on one FW fix but
Fedora itself is in good shape (at least from my testing) so I want to
get an
On Sunday, 10 July 2022 at 19:43, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> Hello.
>
> fmt 9.0.x update will include a soversion bump from .8 to .9. It has both
> API and ABI changes.
[...]
> mkvtoolnix
mkvtoolnix updated and built in the side tag:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8945
My 2 cents... we should try and get bodhi (and the rest of the pipeline)
to work with these large updates if at all possible.
Having releng merge tags works of course, but as Adam pointed out, it
skips our CI and feedback testing area. Additionally, it's more work to
releng folks and more waiting
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 02:34:12PM -0400, Mark Pearson wrote:
> Hi Fedora Devs,
>
> Would someone be able to help getting an official-respin done from F36
> latest please? Similar to what was done for the Carbons etc.
>
> We need one for the Z13 & Z16 preload. We're waiting on one FW fix but
> Fe
On 7/13/22 15:13, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 02:34:12PM -0400, Mark Pearson wrote:
>> Hi Fedora Devs,
>>
>> Would someone be able to help getting an official-respin done from F36
>> latest please? Similar to what was done for the Carbons etc.
>>
>> We need one for the Z13 & Z16 pr
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 03:19:12PM -0400, Mark Pearson wrote:
> On 7/13/22 15:13, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 02:34:12PM -0400, Mark Pearson wrote:
> >> Hi Fedora Devs,
> >>
> >> Would someone be able to help getting an official-respin done from F36
> >> latest please? Similar to
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 03:38:29PM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> Bodhi is a nice interface to create multi-builds update from side-tags,
> but it is not really optimized for massive updates. In the past we had
> some troubles pushing updates with a lot of builds. There are too many
> thing
Jul 13, 2022 1:13:38 PM Adam Williamson :
> If they need to be rebuilt for an API/ABI change, then by policy they
> should be grouped together. We do not want a situation where the
> API/ABI change gets pushed stable but some of the rebuilds do not, or
> vice versa.
We're not talking about ABI/AP
It's not even a question worth asking because it's both impractical and
unlikely to actually fix the situation we have.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Cod
Il 13/07/22 21:11, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto:
> My 2 cents... we should try and get bodhi (and the rest of the pipeline)
> to work with these large updates if at all possible.
>
> Having releng merge tags works of course, but as Adam pointed out, it
> skips our CI and feedback testing area. Additional
43 matches
Mail list logo
