On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 06:34:16PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 08. 07. 22 v 4:59 Stewart Smith via devel napsal(a):
> > > Another - what do we do about, e.g., Fedora IoT and Fedora CoreOS,
> > > which have their own somewhat different release/life cycles? What about
> > > module lifecycles? What is it about*lifecycles*  that's important,
> > > anyway? Don't we maybe want to just have a sort of generic system for
> > > "important events"?
> > I view it as a mechanism to communicate well in advance of when someone
> > is going to have to do work.
> > 
> > Fedora is the simple case: every 6-12 months you're going to have to
> > upgrade the version of the OS.
> 
> And when implementing this for Fedora, can you bear RHEL in mind too? Because 
> it has several levels of EOL
> 
> https://endoflife.software/operating-systems/linux/red-hat-enterprise-linux-rhel

RHEL is indeed more complicated. But RHEL already has its own subscription
manager that knows when and to what extent a given installation has support.
The two main ways to support SUPPORT_END= on such systems:

1. let the subscription management system fill out a date in os-release,
   based on the information it has. If appropriate, the date can be adjusted
   over time.

2. leave SUPPORT_END= unset, so that the existing mechanisms are used.

Option 1. has the advantage that over time generic tools might learn
to look at SUPPORT_END=. But if SUPPORT_END= is not a good fit for some
reason, existing mechanisms can continue to be used, i.e. option 2.

Which way is better will depend on the installation type and other details.

I don't think we should try encode multiple levels of support in os-release.
That file by design is simple: simple to write and simple to read and simple
to interpret. More complicated state can stay external and be a source
for the simplified information in os-release.

Zbyszek
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to