On Wed, 13 Jul 2022 at 18:43, Stephen Smoogen <ssmoo...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 13 Jul 2022 at 12:25, Iñaki Ucar <iu...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: >> >> On Wed, 13 Jul 2022 at 18:13, Robbie Harwood <rharw...@redhat.com> wrote: >> > >> > Maxwell G via devel <devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> writes: >> > >> > > I believe Miro uses this for the FTI bugs. It tends to be more accurate, >> > > especially when there hasn't been a compose for a couple days. If this >> > > is something people are interested in, I think it's worthwhile to >> > > include this repo definition in fedora-packager. >> > >> > An authoritative, preferably single, simple command to run to answer the >> > question "across all architectures, what needs my package and in what >> > form?" would be really helpful. Even if there's a "correct" way to do >> > it today, it's not discoverable (as evidenced by these threads) nor is >> > it easy to remember. Something like `dnf whatuses src:mypackage` (or of >> > similar simplicity) would be appreciated. >> >> If this functionality requires defining and enabling additional repos, >> maybe dnf is not the proper place? But then maybe fedpkg is. Anyway, I >> agree that a simple command would be very much appreciated. >> > > fedpkg would only call dnf to try and get the same information. It doesn't > have any better window on things
It could e.g. package the necessary "development" repos and activate them when calling dnf. -- Iñaki Úcar _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
