Good Morning Everyone,
The packagers listed here have been receiving a daily email asking them to
either adjust their bugzilla or their FAS account so the email address in FAS
matches an existing bugzilla account.
Having a bugzilla account is mandatory per:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the
On Sat, Feb 05, 2022 at 12:17:08AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > Fwiw, given that the primary use case for a cross-toolchain is for
> > developer needs, I think it is reasonable to have only UCRT target in the
> > future.
> >
> > Projects releasing for Windows
Am 06.02.22 um 22:43 schrieb Fabio Valentini:
On Sun, Feb 6, 2022 at 10:34 PM Marius Schwarz wrote:
Hi,
deinstalling the rpmfusion package
"pulseaudio-module-bluetooth-freeworld", which should not be required by
anything:
[root@fedorapine ~]# rpm -q --whatrequires
pulseaudio-module-bluetooth-
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220206.0):
ID: 1120591 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 05:20:31PM +0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 8:18 PM Kevin Kofler via devel <
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> > For the record:
> >
> > https://www.msys2.org/docs/environments/#msvcrt-vs-ucrt states:
> > > MSVCRT […] Works out of
On 2/7/22 01:00, Marius Schwarz wrote:
Am 06.02.22 um 22:43 schrieb Fabio Valentini:
On Sun, Feb 6, 2022 at 10:34 PM Marius Schwarz
wrote:
Hi,
deinstalling the rpmfusion package
"pulseaudio-module-bluetooth-freeworld", which should not be required by
anything:
[root@fedorapine ~]# rpm -q --w
Hi
On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 1:01 PM Daniel P. Berrangé
wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 05, 2022 at 12:17:08AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> > Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > > Fwiw, given that the primary use case for a cross-toolchain is for
> > > developer needs, I think it is reasonable to have only
On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 09:58:07 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Good Morning Everyone,
Hello,
> - shaneallcroft contacted since January 28th
>
> shaneallcroft is main admin of rpms/pyplane
> shaneallcroft has a bugzilla override on rpms/pyplane
Shane is active. I'll contact him on the channels
Hi
On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 1:16 PM Daniel P. Berrangé
wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 05:20:31PM +0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 8:18 PM Kevin Kofler via devel <
> > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> >
> > > For the record:
> > >
> > > https://www.msy
On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 01:29:45PM +0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 1:01 PM Daniel P. Berrangé
> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Feb 05, 2022 at 12:17:08AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> > > Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > > > Fwiw, given that the primary use case for a
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220206.0):
ID: 1120609 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 9:58 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> Good Morning Everyone,
>
> The packagers listed here have been receiving a daily email asking them to
> either adjust their bugzilla or their FAS account so the email address in FAS
> matches an existing bugzilla account.
>
> Having a bu
On 07.02.22 10:29, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
Hi
On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 1:01 PM Daniel P. Berrangé
wrote:
On Sat, Feb 05, 2022 at 12:17:08AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
> Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > Fwiw, given that the primary use case for a cross-toolchain is for
On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 01:38:17PM +0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 1:16 PM Daniel P. Berrangé
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 05:20:31PM +0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 8:18 PM Kevin Kofler via devel <
> > > deve
On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 10:50:00AM +0100, Sandro Mani wrote:
>
> On 07.02.22 10:29, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 1:01 PM Daniel P. Berrangé
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 05, 2022 at 12:17:08AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel
> > wrote:
> > > Marc-And
As noted in the mingw list thread, for me the objective of version parity
between native and mingw packages of the current mingw-environment is a big
selling point. My real-world experience reflects what others shared in this
post, namely that by far most issues which pop up during testing are t
Hi
On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 2:00 PM Daniel P. Berrangé
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 01:38:17PM +0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 1:16 PM Daniel P. Berrangé
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 05:20:31PM +0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > > > Hi
>
Marc-André Lureau wrote:
>FYI, UCRT can be installed on various Windows:
>https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/update-for-universal-c-runtime-in-windows-c0514201-7fe6-95a3-b0a5-287930f3560c
Sure, it *can* be. But that doesn't mean I can rely on my end users
to be able to do that. Currently
Hello,
does anyone know how to reach spredzy (CC'd)?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051519
Regards,
Pavel
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora C
Hello,
this is about the following Fedora change:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ExcludeFromWeakAutodetect
In the tracking bugzilla, the relevant comment is:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013327#c4
If I understand this correctly, the current implementation is not doing
It looks like that the feature made a user case with langpacks broken. See
additional reports:
Bug 2048394 - dnf should pull weak dependencies in install transaction
Bug 2033130 - exclude_from_weak_autodetect=true effectively renders rich weak
dependencies useless
Bug 2042808 - weakdeps not worki
Hi,
I have just orphaned javahelp2:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/javahelp2
As far as I can tell, nothing needs it:
$ repoquery -q --repo=rawhide{,-source,-modular} --whatrequires '*javahelp*'
Upstream has been dead for years and the last commit was in 2017:
https://github.com/javaee/jav
On 07. 02. 22 15:17, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello,
this is about the following Fedora change:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ExcludeFromWeakAutodetect
In the tracking bugzilla, the relevant comment is:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013327#c4
If I understand this correctly
On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 3:26 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> > 3. do not ignore already broken weak rich deps (partially reverts the
> > change)
>
> This sounds like a possible path forward -- it would probably still be an
> improvement over the the Fedora 35 status quo, however the results might be
>
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
6 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 35/228 (x86_64), 25/159 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed i
Hi!
I maintain bind package, which generates html documentation using sphinx
and sphinx_rtd_theme. I admit this format is quite popular. Once I have
noticed that bind-doc package is quite big. When looking why, I have
found not a small number of static copies were generated by
documentation proces
Attending today
Den lör 5 feb. 2022 02:18Adam Williamson skrev:
> # Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
> # Date: 2022-02-07
> # Time: 16:00 UTC
> (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
> # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat
>
> Greetings testers!
>
> It's Branch week, R
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> this is about the following Fedora change:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ExcludeFromWeakAutodetect
>
> In the tracking bugzilla, the relevant comment is:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013327#c4
>
> If I understand this correctly, the current
Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> Release build should be tested on Windows. It is easy to build and test
> natively with msys2 nowadays, or build for other targets. Why not use
> that?
Because I do not have a computer running Windows, nor a Windows license.
Kevin Kofler
Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Marc-André Lureau wrote:
>> Release build should be tested on Windows. It is easy to build and test
>> natively with msys2 nowadays, or build for other targets. Why not use
>> that?
>
> Because I do not have a computer running Windows, nor a Windows license.
PS: We
On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 11:20 AM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
>
> Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > Release build should be tested on Windows. It is easy to build and test
> > natively with msys2 nowadays, or build for other targets. Why not use
> > that?
>
> Because I do not have a computer running Wi
Neal Gompa wrote:
> (Sidebar, I wish the target would be renamed from mingw to windows,
Well, in addition to the trademark concerns, that would also lose the
distinction from Cygwin.
> because it's kind of confusing when we don't even rely on a glibc-nt
> port...)
That would not really be *Mini
On 07. 02. 22 17:17, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
So I would currently tend towards:
* postponing the Change to F37,
* implementing option 2. for F36 (i.e., adding the option as experimental
and disabled by default, which should not need a Change at all), AND
* looking further for a proper so
This is indeed a can of worms.
A previous discussion on the packaging list[1] concluded that, despite the
common practice of packaging Sphinx-generated HTML documentation, there is
probably no practical way to do so without running afoul of guidelines about
bundled or precompiled JavaScript, CS
This is not for a package in Fedora, its for a package I'm
working on for Oracle Linux 8.
I install /usr/lib/systemd/system/myservice.target
that has:
[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target
In %post I run this:
ls -l /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants
/usr/bin/systemctl --no-reload enabl
Slightly off-topic, but I think it's relevant:
If 'myservice' and 'ods-prx' are referring to the same thing, I think
you're supposed to use 'systemctl preset' instead of 'systemctl enable'.
This allows the admin to decide whether the installed
service/target/timer/etc. should be enabled during pac
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 03:25:44PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > 1. do nothing, keep it broken
>
> I pretty much dislike this option. Clearly, the current behavior is not what
> was approved in this change proposal. For me, it's a bad option.
Agreed. We want to use langpacks with rich depenendec
On Sat, 2022-02-05 at 09:28 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> "This update has been submitted for stable by bodhi"
>
> Thanks everyone!
You might wanna just check after the push happens what happened to the
package you untagged. I don't actually know offhand what will happen to
it in this situat
Am 07.02.22 um 18:08 schrieb Neal Gompa:
If anything, our MinGW stack is an amazing selling point compared to
other distributions, because we provide a usable framework to build
applications for Windows.
I'd like to second this. I felt relieved once I found out that I could build a
tiny in-ho
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F37MingwUCRT
>
> Since mingw-*.spec are very repetitive and cumbersome to modify (each
> mingw32, mingw64, ucrt package has to be defined manually, and this is
> tedious and error-prone), a custom MinGW/Fedora tool or solution will
> be proposed. In the mean
Can someone tell me why none of the scriptlets (%pre, post etc) in the spec
file
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/sunwire/rpmtest/fedora-35-x86_64/03364007-python-input-remapper/python-input-remapper.spec
work?
After building the package, all scriptlets are missing and rpm -q
On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 9:57 PM Paweł Marciniak wrote:
>
> Can someone tell me why none of the scriptlets (%pre, post etc) in the spec
> file
> https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/sunwire/rpmtest/fedora-35-x86_64/03364007-python-input-remapper/python-input-remapper.spec
> work?
On Mon, 7 Feb 2022 at 17:10, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 11:20 AM Kevin Kofler via devel
> wrote:
> >
> > Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > > Release build should be tested on Windows. It is easy to build and test
> > > natively with msys2 nowadays, or build for other targets. Why not
On Sun, Feb 6, 2022 at 7:55 AM David Bold wrote:
>
> On 11/15/21 20:15, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RetireARMv7
> >
> ...
> > == Scope ==
> >
> > * Proposal owners: Work with rel-eng to disable the architecture in
> > koji, remove all the various pungi pieces and c
On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 5:27 PM Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 6, 2022 at 7:55 AM David Bold wrote:
> >
> > On 11/15/21 20:15, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RetireARMv7
> > >
> > ...
> > > == Scope ==
> > >
> > > * Proposal owners: Work with rel-eng to disab
> On 7 Feb 2022, at 19:19, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
>
>
> Slightly off-topic, but I think it's relevant:
>
> If 'myservice' and 'ods-prx' are referring to the same thing, I think you're
> supposed to use 'systemctl preset' instead of 'systemctl enable'. This allows
> the admin to decide whe
On Sun, 2022-02-06 at 14:54 +0100, David Bold wrote:
>
>
> I just tried to install Fedora on RPi, and I ended up on [1] where I
> downloaded an image. That was unfortunately armv7 - and I needed to go
> to [2] - which was not linked in the descriptions [3,4]. Also the wiki
> lists first the armv7
On Mon, 2022-02-07 at 15:17 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> The change owner proposed 4 options to move forward. I understand them as
> follows:
>
> 1. do nothing, keep it broken
> 2. disable this behavior by default, keep it optional, but keep it broken
> 3. do not ignore already broken weak ric
On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 03:01:43PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-02-07 at 15:17 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > The change owner proposed 4 options to move forward. I understand them as
> > follows:
> >
> > 1. do nothing, keep it broken
> > 2. disable this behavior by default,
Hello I am Dr Anirban Mitra. I an is open-source enthusiast and amateur
typographer, I am a physician by profession. I had worked for GNU/ Linux
Bengali/ Bangla localisation project and worked on a few open source OpenType
fonts in Bengali.I had described my journey in open source in an article
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> gstreamer1 orphan, uraeus, wtaymans1 weeks
> ago
> gstreamer1-plugins-baseorphan, uraeus, wtaymans1 weeks
> ago
> gstreamer1-plugins-goodorphan, uraeus, wtaymans1 weeks
> ago
How did the gstreamer1 stack
On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 8:12 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
>
> Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > gstreamer1 orphan, uraeus, wtaymans1 weeks
> > ago
> > gstreamer1-plugins-baseorphan, uraeus, wtaymans1 weeks
> > ago
> > gstreamer1-plugins-goodorphan,
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 9:57 PM Paweł Marciniak wrote:
> At first glance, this happens because you apply the scriptlets to the
> wrong package.
"%pre -n python3-%{github_name}"
This is the missing part, thank you Fabio.
> and you should probably also use the macros provided by
> systemd-rpm-mac
Dear Anirban,
স্বাগতম (welcome)! Awesome story, an inspiration to others.
Regards,
Benson
On 2/8/22 3:29 AM, Anirban Mitra via devel wrote:
Hello
I am Dr Anirban Mitra. I an is open-source enthusiast and amateur
typographer, I am a physician by profession. I had worked for GNU/ Linux
Bengali/ B
Thank you, Peter, for coming up with this!
I have to say this is really good news to hear indeed - I have been waiting
silently for this for quite a long time.
Kudos, Jens
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an em
56 matches
Mail list logo
