Re: Any recent changes to the arm builders?

2021-08-16 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 16. 08. 21 0:29, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 11:43:48AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 14. 08. 21 18:19, Kevin Fenzi wrote: It makes me wonder if we should consider letting 32bit arm go... (insert pitchforks and torches). Let's propose it and see what people say? As a package

Re: Running rawhide mockbuild on Fedora 33 fails with GPG check

2021-08-16 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 15. 08. 21 2:02, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello. I've tried to run a rawhide mockbuild on Fedoa 33 and I get GPG failures. It worked yesterday... Solution: Update to mock-core-configs >= 35-1: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VVIUKZLIYMX322HOC3

Re: F35 Change: Memory Constraints macros for RPM (System-Wide Change proposal)

2021-08-16 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 8/16/21 12:25 AM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 06:14:57PM -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim via devel wrote: On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 05:23:18PM -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim via devel wrote: On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 10:56:39AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote: On 8/10/21 8

Fedora-Cloud-34-20210816.0 compose check report

2021-08-16 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210815.0): ID: 949431 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: The Death of Java (packages)

2021-08-16 Thread Vít Ondruch
I wonder what are the requirements for using Copr? FAS account, but is there anything else? I think that maintaining packages in Copr for a while just to gain experience/confidence could deserve better promotion. BTW there is also Fedora Join SIG which focuses on improving of newcomers experie

Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2021-08-16)

2021-08-16 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Monday at 19:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2021-08-16 19:00 UTC' Links to all issues to be dis

Re: The Death of Java (packages)

2021-08-16 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 11:57:57 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > I wonder what are the requirements for using Copr? FAS account, but is there > anything else? I think that maintaining packages in Copr for a while just to > gain experience/confidence could deserve better promotion. I think an FAS is prett

Next Open NeuroFedora Meeting: 1300 UTC on Monday, 16 August (Today)

2021-08-16 Thread Ankur Sinha
Hello everyone, Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday 16th August (today!) at 1300UTC in #fedora-neuro on IRC (Libera.chat). The meeting is a public meeting, and open for everyone to attend. You can join us over: IRC: https://webchat.libera.chat/?channels=#fedora-neur

Re: Next Open NeuroFedora Meeting: 1300 UTC on Monday, 16 August (Today)

2021-08-16 Thread Aniket Pradhan
Hi everyone, Please find the logs from today's meeting below. We will meet again in 2 weeks, at the same time (1300 UTC). Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-neuro/2021-08-16/neurofedora.2021-08-16-13.01.html Log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-neuro/2021-08-16/neurofedo

Re: Any recent changes to the arm builders?

2021-08-16 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 8/15/21 3:41 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 15. 08. 21 4:13, Orion Poplawski wrote: >> Or perhaps at least a statement that support for it is "best effort" only to >> make it more acceptable to ExcludeArch it on some packages. > > Due to the nature of our dependency chain, this would be just slow

Re: Any recent changes to the arm builders?

2021-08-16 Thread Colin Walters
On Sun, Aug 15, 2021, at 6:43 PM, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > > Mark kojid as non-killable by setting its OOM score to -1000? Adding > swap might also help, but then the build is by no means guaranteed to > finish in a reasonable amount of time. If Koji wasn't a clustered container system itse

Re: The Death of Java (packages)

2021-08-16 Thread Pavel Valena
On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 1:38 PM Stephen Snow wrote: > Hello Dan, > Thank you for reaching out with your response. I have to admit, I was > in a provocotive mood the other day. I had solved a problem for a > customer that had been worked on unsuccessfully by a local competitor > for three weeks. I

Please stop submitting interdependent Firefox and NSS updates separately

2021-08-16 Thread Adam Williamson
Hi folks. For about the sixth time this year, interdependent NSS and Firefox updates have been submitted to Bodhi separately: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-6fcdbc958b https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-0446705d87 PLEASE stop doing this. I have been

Can someone help with pycdlib? rhbz#1956566

2021-08-16 Thread Brian C. Lane
There's a bug with pycdlib that has been fixed upstream. I've been trying to get the author/maintainer's attention but to no avail. I've even made and tested a PR for it here: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pycdlib/pull-request/2 This effects mkksiso and livemedia-creator (when using v

Updating Puppet from 5.5 to 7.7 in Fedora 34

2021-08-16 Thread Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden
Hello everyone, For additional visibility: there is currently an open update to bump Puppet from version 5.5 to 7.7 in Fedora 34. While this can be considered a big change (especially since the config directory changes), it should be ok. Puppet 5.5 is completely broken under Ruby 3 and only P

Re: Can someone help with pycdlib? rhbz#1956566

2021-08-16 Thread Scott Talbert
On Mon, 16 Aug 2021, Brian C. Lane wrote: There's a bug with pycdlib that has been fixed upstream. I've been trying to get the author/maintainer's attention but to no avail. I've even made and tested a PR for it here: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pycdlib/pull-request/2 This effect

Overriding default %cmake CXXFLAGS

2021-08-16 Thread Julian Sikorski
Hi, mame needs to have the symbols level reduced to -g1 or the compilation will fail due to relocation overflows and generally excessive memory and disk space usage. Right now this is taken care of by editing $RPM_OPT_FLAGS: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mame/blob/30873dfe8d2ab851bb018b7a

Re: Overriding default %cmake CXXFLAGS

2021-08-16 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 3:14 PM Julian Sikorski wrote: > > Hi, > > mame needs to have the symbols level reduced to -g1 or the compilation > will fail due to relocation overflows and generally excessive memory and > disk space usage. Right now this is taken care of by editing $RPM_OPT_FLAGS: > http

Re: After branching F36, under Rawhide I can not build packages for F35 for i386 arch, instead of it mock builded packages for F36.

2021-08-16 Thread Mikhail Gavrilov
Now compilation failing with error: "Error: GPG check FAILED". https://pastebin.com/HNGz7N8A ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.

Re: Overriding default %cmake CXXFLAGS

2021-08-16 Thread Julian Sikorski
W dniu 16.08.2021 o 21:24, Neal Gompa pisze: On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 3:14 PM Julian Sikorski wrote: Hi, mame needs to have the symbols level reduced to -g1 or the compilation will fail due to relocation overflows and generally excessive memory and disk space usage. Right now this is taken car

Re: Overriding default %cmake CXXFLAGS

2021-08-16 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 3:32 PM Julian Sikorski wrote: > > W dniu 16.08.2021 o 21:24, Neal Gompa pisze: > > On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 3:14 PM Julian Sikorski wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> mame needs to have the symbols level reduced to -g1 or the compilation > >> will fail due to relocation overfl

Re: The Death of Java (packages)

2021-08-16 Thread Stephen Snow
Hello Pavel, Thank you for your thoughts. It strikes me that perhaps what you're advising me to do, is likely what I was wanting to do in the first place. I certainly don't feel dissatisfied being a non-packager in Fedora land, and I am probably a bit guilty of exageration of the difficulties on th

Re: Overriding default %cmake CXXFLAGS

2021-08-16 Thread Julian Sikorski
W dniu 16.08.2021 o 21:33, Neal Gompa pisze: On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 3:32 PM Julian Sikorski wrote: W dniu 16.08.2021 o 21:24, Neal Gompa pisze: On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 3:14 PM Julian Sikorski wrote: Hi, mame needs to have the symbols level reduced to -g1 or the compilation will fail due

Re: Overriding default %cmake CXXFLAGS

2021-08-16 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 16/08/2021 21:14, Julian Sikorski wrote: mame needs to have the symbols level reduced to -g1 or the compilation will fail due to relocation overflows and generally excessive memory and disk space usage. %global optflags %(echo %{optflags} | sed 's/-g /-g1 /') -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev

FedoraRespin-34-updates-20210816.0 compose check report

2021-08-16 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 3/45 (x86_64) ID: 949838 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_fprint URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/949838 ID: 949844 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/94984

Re: Overriding default %cmake CXXFLAGS

2021-08-16 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 16/08/2021 22:03, Julian Sikorski wrote: %global build_cflags %(echo $RPM_OPT_FLAGS | sed "s@-g@-g1@") %global build_cxxflags %(echo $RPM_OPT_FLAGS | sed "s@-g@-g1@") Changing optflags is better, because it will affect all build flags at once: C, C++, Fortran, etc. -- Sincerely, Vitaly

Re: Updated hdf5/netcdf/octave coming to rawhide/f35

2021-08-16 Thread Jerry James
Hi Orion, On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 8:17 PM Orion Poplawski wrote: > I've just submitted the updates for F35 and F36. There are a few > packages have failed to build (mainly due to arm or other package issues > - not many due to these updates it seems) and I'll be working on them > and/or filing b

Re: Any recent changes to the arm builders?

2021-08-16 Thread Jeremy Linton
Hi, On 8/16/21 12:55 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: * Kevin Fenzi: On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 01:51:16PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: * Kevin Fenzi: Yes. They were mistakenly running the normal kernel (so they had ~3GB memory available). I moved them back to the lpae kernel (so they see 40GB memory

Re: Updated hdf5/netcdf/octave coming to rawhide/f35

2021-08-16 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 8/16/21 2:36 PM, Jerry James wrote: > Hi Orion, > > On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 8:17 PM Orion Poplawski wrote: >> I've just submitted the updates for F35 and F36. There are a few >> packages have failed to build (mainly due to arm or other package issues >> - not many due to these updates it seem

Re: Updated hdf5/netcdf/octave coming to rawhide/f35

2021-08-16 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 11:22 PM Orion Poplawski wrote: > > That does appear to be the case, it's still pending: > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-de38a77e64 It's not just taking long, it's stuck. It even gives you a hint as to *why* it's still pending: "This update cannot b

Re: Updated hdf5/netcdf/octave coming to rawhide/f35

2021-08-16 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 8/16/21 3:29 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 11:22 PM Orion Poplawski wrote: >> >> That does appear to be the case, it's still pending: >> >> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-de38a77e64 > > It's not just taking long, it's stuck. It even gives you a hint

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210816.n.0 changes

2021-08-16 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210814.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210816.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:3 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 81 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 6.00 MiB Size of dropped packages:1.32

Fedora-Rawhide-20210816.n.0 compose check report

2021-08-16 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 4 of 43 required tests failed, 1 result missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests: MISSING: fedora.Clou

Summary/Minutes from yesterdays's FESCo Meeting (2021-08-23)

2021-08-16 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Meeting summary --- * #2660 F35 incomplete changes: Code complete (testable) deadline (zbyszek, 19:18:40) - GNU Toolchain update (gcc 11, glibc 2.34, binutils 2.37, gdb 10.2) (zbyszek, 19:19:23) (Seems mostly done, we'll wait for updates.) - CompilerPolicy Change (zbyszek, 19:

Maintanenace of redhat-rpm-macros

2021-08-16 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Hi Florian and Florian, Adam, Don, Jon, and Panu! It seems that the (quite fundamental) redhat-rpm-config config package could use more maintainer attention. Pull requests tend not to get a reply from the maintainers, so in the end proven packagers end up merging stuff [1,2], for better or worse,