Am 09.11.20 um 18:34 schrieb Florian Weimer:
It not only caches names, it also RANDOMIZES the requests to the dns
servers configured, increasing the privacy of ones internet journey.
nscd? I don't think it does anything like that. It doesn't even have
its own DNS code, it uses the same code th
Am 11.11.20 um 16:58 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
So if you configure 4 DNS servers then each will still get roughly
1/4th of your requests? That's still quite a lot of info.
the more you use, and i did, the better it protects against tracking by
the dns cache owners.
How about putting this as
Il 14/11/20 20:57, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 02:12:44PM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
>> ... and third version:
>>
>> https://mattia.fedorapeople.org/updates_policy_v3.svg
>> https://mattia.fedorapeople.org/updates_policy_v3.png
> Thanks for working on this. ;)
>
> I
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64), 7/7 (aarch64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le..
On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 01:12:44PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> * Name: [[User:dkeefe|Dennis Keefe]], [[User:mulhern|Anne Mulhern]],
> [[User:jbaublitz|John Baublitz]]
> * Email: dke...@redhat.com, amulh...@redhat.com, jbaubl...@redhat.com
> == Upgrade/compatibility impact ==
>
> Stratis symlinks h
Hi Andy,
On Fri, 2020-11-13 at 02:16 +, Andy Li wrote:
> Re. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896901
>
> Since haxe-4.1.3-4 and nekovm-2.3.0-4, both nekovm and haxe packages
> contains "/usr/lib/.build-
> id/b0/aed4ddf2d45372bcc79d5e95d2834f5045c09c".
> The nekovm one is a symlink
On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 at 13:02, Petr Pisar wrote:
> Upstream relicensed and dropped an old BSD code in 4.06 release. Hence the
> RPM package changes license from "BSD and LGPLv2+ and GPLv2 and GPLv2+"
> to "LGPLv2+ and GPLv2 and GPLv2+".
>
> -- Petr
>
> Thanks for the heads-up! :)
_
Hi everyone,
I want to rebuild some of the fedora 33 packages for EL8 (vagrant, for
example), but I'm having trouble getting all of the build dependencies
right. I ran dnf to download the SRPMS with the --resolve option, but I'm
still missing dependencies when I submit the builds to copr.
My curr
On So, 15.11.20 10:18, Marius Schwarz (fedora...@cloud-foo.de) wrote:
> Am 11.11.20 um 16:58 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> > So if you configure 4 DNS servers then each will still get roughly
> > 1/4th of your requests? That's still quite a lot of info.
> the more you use, and i did, the better it
Hi,
I've been trying to get these two pull requests reviewed / merged
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/transmission-remote-gtk/pull-request/1,
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/transmission-remote-gtk/pull-request/2 but I
can't seem to get anyone to do that. I have tried [at]mention-ing pack
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 34 Rawhide 20201115.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20201114.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20201115.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 45
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
On Sunday, November 15, 2020 3:10:03 PM WET Jason Edgecombe wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I want to rebuild some of the fedora 33 packages for EL8 (vagrant, for
> example), but I'm having trouble getting all of the build dependencies
> right. I ran dnf to download the SRPMS with the --resolve option,
As in title, rprojroot re-licensed from GPLv3 to MIT.
--
Elliott
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/pr
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 8:19 AM Christoph Junghans wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Using latex in Docker on Rawhide gives an "I can't find the format
> file `latex.fmt'!" error.
> I have seen this before but I don't recall how to fix it.
>
> Mini reproducer using the following Dockerfile:
> FROM registry.fedor
As in title, here re-licensed from GPLv3 to MIT.
There are also some new dependencies, so likely won't be building this
in Rawhide for a little bit until they are reviewed.
--
Elliott
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscri
On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 4:12 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 01:12:44PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > * Name: [[User:dkeefe|Dennis Keefe]], [[User:mulhern|Anne Mulhern]],
> > [[User:jbaublitz|John Baublitz]]
> > * Email: dke...@redhat.com, amulh...@redhat.com, jbau
On 11/15/20 7:31 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Implementing this does not come without drawbacks though: right now
resolved tries hard to use the same server if at all possible, since
we want to use newer DNS features if possible, but many DNS servers
(wifi routers, yuck) tend to support them qui
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64), 5/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20201114.0):
ID: 722860 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/722860
ID: 722872 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-is
Thanks José!
This looks promising, but I must admit that I don't understand enough of
the Fedora packaging process to really understand it. Can I use this for
personal projects without pushing it to the main Fedora packaging process?
I'm not totally opposed to becoming a full-blown package mainta
Hello everyone,
I'm a Linux admin at a university supporting around 100+ EL7/8 and Ubuntu
machines. I've been using Linux as a hobby since around 1994 and
professionally since 1999. My first Linux experience was installing
Slackware from floppies on a computer with a 486DX processor (The
predece
On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 at 18:37, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 11/15/20 7:31 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > Implementing this does not come without drawbacks though: right now
> > resolved tries hard to use the same server if at all possible, since
> > we want to use newer DNS features if possible, but
Once upon a time, Stephen John Smoogen said:
> Because a lot of networks use routing tricks to send traffic to particular
> DNS server IP addresses. They may round robin, traffic route, or other
> methods to send you to different DNS servers with the same ip address. Even
> if they are all the sam
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
2 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 14/177 (x86_64), 18/115 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in
dnf builddep fedora-review.spec ? after reading what fbrnch does, I
remembered that
On Sun, 2020-11-15 at 10:10 -0500, Jason Edgecombe wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I want to rebuild some of the fedora 33 packages for EL8 (vagrant,
> for example), but I'm having trouble getting all of the build
>
On 2020-11-16 02:23 UTC, Sérgio Basto wrote:
dnf builddep fedora-review.spec ? after reading what fbrnch does, I remembered
that
Unfortunately "dnf builddep" has a DESIGN error: it does not separate the task
"find the names of the missing packages" from the task "install packages".
"find the
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20201115.0):
ID: 722901 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
27 matches
Mail list logo
