On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 01:12:44PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: > * Name: [[User:dkeefe|Dennis Keefe]], [[User:mulhern|Anne Mulhern]], > [[User:jbaublitz|John Baublitz]] > * Email: dke...@redhat.com, amulh...@redhat.com, jbaubl...@redhat.com
> == Upgrade/compatibility impact == > > Stratis symlinks have moved. Existing symlinks in /stratis/<pool > name>/<filesystem name> will need to be migrated to > /dev/stratis/<pool name>/<filesystem name>. This is accomplished by > running the migration script (stratis_migrate_symlinks.sh) that comes > with the > 2.2.0 release of Stratis or rebooting the system. Any configurations > that make use of the old symlink locations will > need to be updated to use the new location. So, if there has been > manual changes to systemd unit files or /etc/fstab > for automatically mounting Stratis filesystems, then these will need > to be updated to reflect the change. How large is the risk that systems that were using the old /stratis/foo paths will fail to mount the filesystems, and possibly fail to boot, after the upgrade? (Sorry, I have never used stratis, so I don't know how often those migration steps would be necessary.) Shouldn't /startis symlink be created for compatibility on *upgrades* ? Zbyszek _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
