No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
On pe, 15 touko 2020, Charalampos Stratakis wrote:
Hello everyone,
As of Python 3.8, python C extensions modules should not link to
libpython, unless they embed the interpreter in their code. Relevant
upstream PR: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/12946 If your
package links to libpython wi
* Charalampos Stratakis:
> If your package links to libpython without requiring it, it won't be
> possible to use the python3-debug binary with your python C extension,
> unless you recompile the extension against it.
Would it make sense to work around this by some other means?
Thanks,
Florian
_
Le vendredi 15 mai 2020 à 11:11 -0400, Simo Sorce a écrit :
>
> So, another way that could work, with minimal tooling is that we
> keep
> the master branch strictly mirroring whatever upstream branch we
> follow,
For some projects we are not hopping between branches of the same
upstream git, we
Le vendredi 15 mai 2020 à 08:30 -0700, stan via devel a écrit :
> On Fri, 15 May 2020 08:02:34 +0200
> Michal Srb wrote:
>
> An aside, just to clarify for myself. That means that all Java apps
> are
> the equivalent of statically linked, right? And are related to
> things
> like flatpaks and mo
Hello,
As subject says:
https://ask.fedoraproject.org/t/comparing-fedora-centos-security-fix-lag/7117
(I looked around a bit and couldn't find any documentation on this).
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) |
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: E
On 15/05/20 14:57, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 7:57 AM Petr Pisar wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 06:30:04AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 6:15 AM Petr Pisar wrote:
>>>
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:42:15PM +0200, Antonio Trande wrote:
>
Hi,
Ankur Sinha wrote on Sat, May 16, 2020:
> As subject says:
> https://ask.fedoraproject.org/t/comparing-fedora-centos-security-fix-lag/7117
>
> (I looked around a bit and couldn't find any documentation on this).
I've tried for a bit (~10 mins) but I really can't get discourse to let
me reply
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
ID: 599812 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/599812
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.i
Hi,
once in a while I get annoyed at how slow bash is to startup; using a
tiling wm poping a new shell is supposed to be quite fast but I'm
staring at a new empty window for ~1s everytime and it gets annoying...
According to https://xkcd.com/1205/ wasting 1s 50+ times a day is worth
spending some
Are you use SSD?
I have 0.087s on it.
сб, 16 мая 2020 г., 13:57 Dominique Martinet :
> Hi,
>
> once in a while I get annoyed at how slow bash is to startup; using a
> tiling wm poping a new shell is supposed to be quite fast but I'm
> staring at a new empty window for ~1s everytime and it gets a
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:38:06PM +0200, Dominique Martinet wrote:
> I'm curious about this point, there is a security team[0] so it could be
> interesting to get one of them on the list? I'm not following quite
> close enough what they do...
Currently there is not too much activity in the securi
Vascom wrote on Sat, May 16, 2020:
> Are you use SSD?
>
> I have 0.087s on it.
Yes, I have a SSD. The bottleneck here really is cpu speed; I have my
laptop's frequency limited to 1GHz in normal circumstances (when not
building code or similar activities) so the fan doesn't turn up
With max (4.6G
Hi Dominique,
Dominique Martinet writes:
> *snip*
>
> 341 to 130ms is a good start I guess, the rest of the waiting time
> probably now outweights bash and will get some looking at at a later
> point, but might as well start somewhere.
That's quite the improvement! Good job and thanks for looki
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 11:39 AM Dominique Martinet
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ankur Sinha wrote on Sat, May 16, 2020:
> > As subject says:
> >
> https://ask.fedoraproject.org/t/comparing-fedora-centos-security-fix-lag/7117
> >
> > (I looked around a bit and couldn't find any documentation on this).
>
> I'
Le samedi 16 mai 2020 à 11:09 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
> Le vendredi 15 mai 2020 à 11:11 -0400, Simo Sorce a écrit :
> > So, another way that could work, with minimal tooling is that we
> > keep
> > the master branch strictly mirroring whatever upstream branch we
> > follow,
>
> For some
Jared K. Smith wrote:
> I'm going to disagree with you here, specifically with regards to the "I
> don't care" piece. From my time in FESCo, and as the FPL before that -- I
> can never remember a time when someone abstained because they didn't care.
> I remember people abstaining because they didn
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> One thing that I think this conversation thread *has* achieved is
> identifying that most Fedorans don't consider a FESCo member voting in
> favor of their own Change Proposal to be a conflict of interest. I
> think we should probably recognize this and take that out of t
Charalampos Stratakis wrote:
> kkoflercalamares kig
These both embed the Python interpreter and thus necessarily link to
libpython.
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-l
On Sat, 16 May 2020 11:23:03 +0200
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le vendredi 15 mai 2020 à 08:30 -0700, stan via devel a écrit :
> > On Fri, 15 May 2020 08:02:34 +0200
> > Michal Srb wrote:
> >
> > An aside, just to clarify for myself. That means that all Java apps
> > are
> > the equivalent of sta
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 9:02 AM Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > One thing that I think this conversation thread *has* achieved is
> > identifying that most Fedorans don't consider a FESCo member voting in
> > favor of their own Change Proposal to be a conflict of interest. I
>
Hey,
I confirmed it with upstream.
The files with GPL 2 license were actually not included in compilation and
> are now removed. Most of the small files without license are test data
> which obviously cannot be edited to contain license, but I have omitted the
> license from individual code files
Hello All,
I was working on getting tensorflow compiled within the *RISCV *Fedora
environment.
I am using the latest release 32 build.
Currently I am unable to install the dependent library, scipy due to the
same not being available for python 3.8.1 which is currently installed.
*[riscv@fed
Hi all.
`libb2-0.98.1` has been required on F31 [1] and EPEL7 [2]; it expects a
soname bump, so all dependent packages need to be rebuilt:
$ repoquery --whatrequires libb2-devel --disablerepo=*
--enablerepo=*-source
R-argon2-0:0.2.0-8.fc32.src
borgbackup-0:1.1.11-1.fc32.src
gtkhash-0:1.2-2.fc32.s
On 16/05/20 19:39, Antonio Trande wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> `libb2-0.98.1` has been required on F31 [1] and EPEL7 [2]; it expects a
> soname bump, so all dependent packages need to be rebuilt:
>
> $ repoquery --whatrequires libb2-devel --disablerepo=*
> --enablerepo=*-source
> R-argon2-0:0.2.0-8.fc32.
Il giorno ven, 15/05/2020 alle 18.08 +0200, Dario Lesca ha scritto:
> I have a test environment for test samba AD MIT kerberos out of the
> box
>
> I have a AD-DC samba on Fedora 32 (addc1), a Centos 8 member server
> (centos8) and two PC windows 10 (win10a and win10b), fedora.loc is
> the
> AD do
Hello,
I am co-maintaining an epel-7 package (dist-git) and I wanted to add
it to epel-8 too. But right now, it wouldn't install because one of
the dependencies (moreutils) is newly in PowerTools repo
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833810).
I assume that basically means I cannot de
On Sat, 16 May 2020 20:23:35 +0200
clime wrote:
> I am co-maintaining an epel-7 package (dist-git) and I wanted to add
> it to epel-8 too. But right now, it wouldn't install because one of
> the dependencies (moreutils) is newly in PowerTools repo
> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=183
Hi all,
I would like to get a couple of packages reviewed, and maybe do a review
swap, but I'm not sure how much help I would be on other packages since
I still feel pretty new to this.
First up is studio-controls:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1836542
Studio Controls is formerly k
On Sat, 16 May 2020 at 20:33, Paul Howarth wrote:
>
> On Sat, 16 May 2020 20:23:35 +0200
> clime wrote:
> > I am co-maintaining an epel-7 package (dist-git) and I wanted to add
> > it to epel-8 too. But right now, it wouldn't install because one of
> > the dependencies (moreutils) is newly in Pow
On 5/16/20 3:56 AM, Dominique Martinet wrote:
- down to 0.130s after moving /etc/bash_completion.d/* to
/usr/share/bash-completion/completions/
I thought that generally, the /etc versions of config directories were
intended for the purpose of local overrides of the /usr/share versions.
Th
# CPE Weekly: 2020-05-16
---
title: CPE Weekly status email
tags: CPE Weekly, email
---
Background:
The Community Platform Engineering group is the Red Hat team combining
IT and release engineering from Fedora and CentOS.Check out our teams
info here https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/cpe/
Samuel Sieb wrote on Sat, May 16, 2020:
> On 5/16/20 3:56 AM, Dominique Martinet wrote:
>> - down to 0.130s after moving /etc/bash_completion.d/* to
>> /usr/share/bash-completion/completions/
>
> I thought that generally, the /etc versions of config directories
> were intended for the purpose of
On la, 16 touko 2020, Dario Lesca wrote:
Il giorno ven, 15/05/2020 alle 18.08 +0200, Dario Lesca ha scritto:
I have a test environment for test samba AD MIT kerberos out of the
box
I have a AD-DC samba on Fedora 32 (addc1), a Centos 8 member server
(centos8) and two PC windows 10 (win10a and wi
Hi all,
I'm still the primary maintainer for Vala, but de facto have not been
doing much with it -- it mostly gets auto-upgraded together with the
rest of the GNOME stack.
As such I'm not really the best person to have issues assigned to, and
if anyone else wants to take over the reign, I'll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Starting with version 2.0.3.
- --
Igor Raits
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEcwgJ58gsbV5f5dMcEV1auJxcHh4FAl7ASD0ACgkQEV1auJxc
Hh5QBhAAssR1Byvq+LuUMsL3zqmBHwCMnu4xVjNq8VDMp0KELM3H8HzMV7jKsa8w
s2v1P7HRtKQkGXQMiOgcuLhlhv8b0wMFdPgMlV34UG
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 08:42:20PM +0200, clime wrote:
> On Sat, 16 May 2020 at 20:33, Paul Howarth wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 16 May 2020 20:23:35 +0200
> > clime wrote:
> > > I am co-maintaining an epel-7 package (dist-git) and I wanted to add
> > > it to epel-8 too. But right now, it wouldn't inst
Am 16.05.20 um 19:39 schrieb Antonio Trande:
> `libb2-0.98.1` has been required on F31 [1] and EPEL7 [2]; it expects a
> soname bump, so all dependent packages need to be rebuilt:
>
> $ repoquery --whatrequires libb2-devel --disablerepo=*
> --enablerepo=*-source
> R-argon2-0:0.2.0-8.fc32.src
> bo
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 01:09:32PM +0100, Ian McInerney wrote:
> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 11:39 AM Dominique Martinet
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Ankur Sinha wrote on Sat, May 16, 2020:
> > > As subject says:
> > >
> > https://ask.fedoraproject.org/t/comparing-fedora-centos-security-fix-lag/7117
>
swift-lang includes its own private copy of LLDB for its REPL, which uses
Python as its scripting language so it too is linking correctly.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorapro
Am 16.05.20 um 20:42 schrieb clime:
> I am a long term epel user and I had no idea about PowerTools.
Yeah, I don't think you are the only one. Most EPEL 8 users do not need
anything from PowerTools so it goes pretty much unnoticed.
I got 3 or 4 bug reports about this when I added certbot to EPEL
Hi,
I am going to update gloox to the newest version.
I am going to build in the side tag f33-build-side-23466
0ad and uwsgi need to be rebuild.
$ dnf repoquery --whatrequires gloox-devel --repo=rawhide-source
0ad-0:0.0.23b-13.fc33.src
uwsgi-0:2.0.18-8.fc33.src
Cheers,
David
__
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 02:12:00PM -0400, Charalampos Stratakis wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> As of Python 3.8, python C extensions modules should not link to libpython,
> unless they embed the interpreter in their code. Relevant upstream PR:
> https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/12946
> If yo
I recently adopted flatbuffers, which was orphaned due to an open FTBFS
in F32 [1]. I've fixed the spec, rebuilt, and made an update in bodhi,
but I'm unable to close the FTBFS bug because it hasn't been reassigned
to me. What should I do? Am I supposed to be able to edit this bug? I'm
in the editb
Hi!
This might be related to this issue:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8628
I had the same problem a month ago... Maybe you can ask for someone
there to fix your account's permissions manually?
Le 17/05/2020 à 00:25, Benjamin Lowry a écrit :
I recently adopted flatbuffers,
On Sun, 2020-05-17 at 04:10 +0100, Lyes Saadi wrote:
> Hi!
>
> This might be related to this issue:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8628
>
> I had the same problem a month ago... Maybe you can ask for someone
> there to fix your account's permissions manually?
Thanks for the lin
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
48 matches
Mail list logo
