Dne 19. 12. 19 v 0:29 Jeff Fearn napsal(a):
> On 19/12/19 01:00, David Cantrell wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 01:00:03PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>> Just FTR, for Red Hat Software Collections, we are (ab)using "Version"
>>> BZ field to track the SCL version (e.g. [1]), which in module
>>> te
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 08:30:39PM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 12/18/19 8:35 AM, Adrian Reber wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 07:36:25AM +0100, Adrian Reber wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 09:26:16PM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > > > On 12/1/19 10:48 AM, Adrian Reber wrote:
> > >
On 18. 12. 19 15:53, David Cantrell wrote:
Maybe if a module bundles a package, the module maintainer also becomes a
co-maintainer on the bundled package?
How this appears to work now:
1. If one bundles a package in a module they need to create a stream branch
(unless they bundle form master/
Hello team,
Xournal++, a spiritual successor of xournal (the original author even
recommended it) is now available in the testing repository:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=xournalpp
Please give karma to quickly make it available on the stable release.
The good part is bot
On 19/12/2019 6:31 pm, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 19. 12. 19 v 0:29 Jeff Fearn napsal(a):
>> On 19/12/19 01:00, David Cantrell wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 01:00:03PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Just FTR, for Red Hat Software Collections, we are (ab)using "Version"
BZ field to track
We want to port fedora for RISC-V with out compressed (RV64IMAFD) instructions.
We are from Centre for Development of Advanced Computing (C-DAC) India.
We have implemented an Out-of order quad core RISC-V processor on FPGA.
The processor is without compressed instructions.
We want to port fedora
Hi Miro,
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 08:15:18 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> I've orphaned python-trimesh.
>
> I couldn't keep up with the upstream release cadence and nothing seems to
> require it.
>
> Will gladly keep co-maintaining if somebody takes it.
fsleyes uses it as an optional dependency, so I
On 19. 12. 19 11:55, Ankur Sinha wrote:
Hi Miro,
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 08:15:18 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
I've orphaned python-trimesh.
I couldn't keep up with the upstream release cadence and nothing seems to
require it.
Will gladly keep co-maintaining if somebody takes it.
fsleyes uses it
On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 8:20 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-12-13 at 09:19 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > It would be great if they could include the size +/- of all the images.
> > Of course the most important ones would be boot.iso, workstation and
> > server, but labs and spins could
On 2019-12-17, David Cantrell wrote:
> 4) How can users determine what packages are installed from a module and how
> can you see what, if any, module "owns" a package? I have been unable to
> determine how to do this from dnf.
>
By asking dnf. perl-libs-5.30.1-449.fc32.x86_64 is a non-modular pa
Dne 19. 12. 19 v 10:36 Jeff Fearn napsal(a):
> On 19/12/2019 6:31 pm, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Dne 19. 12. 19 v 0:29 Jeff Fearn napsal(a):
>>> On 19/12/19 01:00, David Cantrell wrote:
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 01:00:03PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Just FTR, for Red Hat Software Collections, w
On 19. 12. 19 13:13, Petr Pisar wrote:
On 2019-12-17, David Cantrell wrote:
4) How can users determine what packages are installed from a module and how
can you see what, if any, module "owns" a package? I have been unable to
determine how to do this from dnf.
By asking dnf. perl-libs-5.30.1
It seems a new xen-libs build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1423669
was done by mayoung yesterday. This bumped the sonames of several
libraries, all the ones with the upstream version in their soname
(libxenctrl, libxenfsimage, libxenguest, libxenlight, libxenstat,
libxlu
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 08:09:49AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> It seems a new xen-libs build:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1423669
>
> was done by mayoung yesterday. This bumped the sonames of several
> libraries, all the ones with the upstream version in their so
Hello Carson!
Welcome aboard! What does "ale li pona" means?
Greetings,
Silvia
On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 at 05:52, Carson Black wrote:
> Greetings y'all.
>
> My name is Carson Black & it's nice to meet y'all.
> I'm from Frankfort, Kentucky (and no, I'm not interested in bourbon), and
> I'm curre
Hi all,
I'd like to unretire python-spec, which was retired in 2016 due to
having been orphaned for at least six weeks.
Re-review ticket: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1785391
Cheers, Paul.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproj
On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 10:24:16AM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> Side note: Considering that there are comparatively few armv7hl
> builders, I wonder why a rather big share of my noarch builds gets
> scheduled to run on them. Naively, I'd think that armv7hl should be
> busy doing builds for "a
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 06:41:56PM +0530, Gobinda Das wrote:
> Hi,
> I am Gobinda Das, working at Redhat india as a senior software engineer.
Hello.
> Now I want to take the build responsibility for below projects as (sac)
> left redhat who use to take care build.
> Projects are: gluster-ansibl
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 02:52:03PM -0500, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> David Cantrell writes:
...snip...
> > I would like to see modules have a stronger policy around tracking and
> > handling CVEs. At the very least, what Fedora already does for
> > regular packages.
>
> I would like this as well,
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 09:29:36AM +1000, Jeff Fearn wrote:
> On 19/12/19 01:00, David Cantrell wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 01:00:03PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >> Just FTR, for Red Hat Software Collections, we are (ab)using "Version"
> >> BZ field to track the SCL version (e.g. [1]), whic
"ale li pona" is a Toki Pona proverb that can mean a lot of things,
but in this context, it means "all is good."
-- Carson Black [jan Pontaoski]
Am Do., 19. Dez. 2019 um 14:20 Uhr schrieb Silvia Sánchez :
>
>
> Hello Carson!
>
> Welcome aboard! What does "ale li pona" means?
>
> Greetings,
> Sil
On Thu, 2019-12-19 at 12:13 +, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2019-12-17, David Cantrell wrote:
> > 4) How can users determine what packages are installed from a module and how
> > can you see what, if any, module "owns" a package? I have been unable to
> > determine how to do this from dnf.
> >
> B
On Thu, 19 Dec 2019 12:10:00 -0800
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 10:24:16AM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > Side note: Considering that there are comparatively few armv7hl
> > builders, I wonder why a rather big share of my noarch builds gets
> > scheduled to run on them. Na
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/LTOByDefault
== Summary ==
This is a proposal to enable link time optimization (LTO) of packages
built with rpmbuild by default. It's an over-simplification, but
think of LTO as deferring analysis, optimization and code generation
until creation of an executable or
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EnableFSTrimTimer
== Summary ==
Enabling fstrim.timer will cause fstrim.service to execute weekly,
which in turn executes `/usr/sbin/fstrim --fstab --verbose --quiet`
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:chrismurphy| Chris Murphy]]
* Email: bugzi...@colorremedies.com
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Use-Update-Alternatives-For-usr-bin-cc
== Summary ==
Modify the gcc package so that the /usr/bin/cc and /usr/bin/c++
symlinks are managed by update-alternatives.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:tstellar| Tom Stellard]]
* Email:
== Detailed Description ==
The gc
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 3:44 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Use-Update-Alternatives-For-usr-bin-cc
>
> == Summary ==
> Modify the gcc package so that the /usr/bin/cc and /usr/bin/c++
> symlinks are managed by update-alternatives.
>
> == Owner ==
> * Name: [[User:ts
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 3:42 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/LTOByDefault
>
> == Summary ==
> This is a proposal to enable link time optimization (LTO) of packages
> built with rpmbuild by default. It's an over-simplification, but
> think of LTO as deferring analysis, opti
Hi Jeff,
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 10:50 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/LTOByDefault
>
> == Summary ==
> This is a proposal to enable link time optimization (LTO) of packages
> built with rpmbuild by default. It's an over-simplification, but
> think of LTO as deferring ana
On 20/12/19 06:22, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 09:29:36AM +1000, Jeff Fearn wrote:
>> On 19/12/19 01:00, David Cantrell wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 01:00:03PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Just FTR, for Red Hat Software Collections, we are (ab)using "Version"
BZ field
On Thu, 2019-12-19 at 21:56 +, devel-
requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
>
Neal,
>
> I'm generally happy with this idea. I'm one of the maintainers of
> rpm-config-SUSE (the equivalent of redhat-rpm-config for SUSE
> distributions) and I somewhat saw the development of this feature
> a
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 4:14 PM Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2019-12-19 at 21:56 +, devel-
> requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
> >
>
> Neal,
>
>
> >
> > I'm generally happy with this idea. I'm one of the maintainers of
> > rpm-config-SUSE (the equivalent of redhat-rpm-config for SUSE
> > d
On Thu, 2019-12-19 at 22:14 +, devel-
requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
Igor,
> Send devel mailing list submissions to
>
> It would be very nice to get more specific analysis data. Like running
> some benchmarks of big applications, size comparisons (of binaries and
> libraries) and comp
On Thu, 2019-12-19 at 16:24 -0600, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 4:14 PM Jeff Law wrote:
> > On Thu, 2019-12-19 at 21:56 +, devel-
> > requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
> >
> > Neal,
> >
> >
> > > I'm generally happy with this idea. I'm one of the maintainers of
> > > rpm
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 5:44 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Use-Update-Alternatives-For-usr-bin-cc
>
> == Summary ==
> Modify the gcc package so that the /usr/bin/cc and /usr/bin/c++
> symlinks are managed by update-alternatives.
>
> == Owner ==
> * Name: [[User:ts
On Thu, 19 Dec 2019 at 21:13, Dan Horák wrote:
>
> On Thu, 19 Dec 2019 12:10:00 -0800
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 10:24:16AM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > >
> > > Side note: Considering that there are comparatively few armv7hl
> > > builders, I wonder why a rather big s
I would like to (re)take ownership of the pwntools package that was
recently retired:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701958
Fedora retired the package because pwntools had for some time not
supported Python 3. Some of the Python 2 packages on which it depended
had themselves been de
On Thu, 19 Dec 2019, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EnableFSTrimTimer
== Summary ==
Enabling fstrim.timer will cause fstrim.service to execute weekly,
which in turn executes `/usr/sbin/fstrim --fstab --verbose --quiet`
== How To Test ==
The low level function of sys
On Thursday, December 19, 2019 8:39:45 PM MST Stuart D. Gathman wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Dec 2019, Ben Cotton wrote:
>
>
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EnableFSTrimTimer
> >
> >
> >
> > == Summary ==
> > Enabling fstrim.timer will cause fstrim.service to execute weekly,
> > which in turn e
On 19.12.2019 22:41, Ben Cotton wrote:
> This is a proposal to enable link time optimization (LTO) of packages
> built with rpmbuild by default. It's an over-simplification, but
> think of LTO as deferring analysis, optimization and code generation
> until creation of an executable or dynamic shar
On 19.12.2019 22:42, Ben Cotton wrote:
> Modify the gcc package so that the /usr/bin/cc and /usr/bin/c++
> symlinks are managed by update-alternatives.
It seems to me that it has already been implemented in old Fedora
releases as well as alternatives for text editors. Later it was decided
to drop
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 8:40 PM Stuart D. Gathman wrote:
>
> On Thu, 19 Dec 2019, Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EnableFSTrimTimer
> >
> > == Summary ==
> > Enabling fstrim.timer will cause fstrim.service to execute weekly,
> > which in turn executes `/usr/sbin/fstr
On Thursday, December 19, 2019 11:59:54 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 8:40 PM Stuart D. Gathman
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 19 Dec 2019, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EnableFSTrimTimer
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > == Summary ==
> > >
Always before upgrade to a new *major* version of distribution, you
are supposed to read release notes. This will be noted there and you,
as a user, can explicitly disable it after upgrade. Or even ship your
own preset which would override system's one.
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 8:12 AM John M. Harr
44 matches
Mail list logo
