Dne 19. 12. 19 v 10:36 Jeff Fearn napsal(a): > On 19/12/2019 6:31 pm, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Dne 19. 12. 19 v 0:29 Jeff Fearn napsal(a): >>> On 19/12/19 01:00, David Cantrell wrote: >>>> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 01:00:03PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: >>>>> Just FTR, for Red Hat Software Collections, we are (ab)using "Version" >>>>> BZ field to track the SCL version (e.g. [1]), which in module >>>>> terminology resembles stream. Maybe we could reuse something similar for >>>>> modules in Fedora. >>>> I think Fedora would have to do something like that to indicate module >>>> ownership in a bug. The Version field requires BZ maintenance for that >>>> list >>>> which could mean that each module version would need a new entry in that >>>> list. At least that's how I understand that BZ field the last time I >>>> looked >>>> at it. >>>> >>>> We could come up with syntax and place it in one of the Whiteboard fields. >>>> Something like module=eclipse;ver=X.Y.Z >>>> >>>> That would probably get ugly real fast. >>> The version field is for the version of the product the bug is in, it >>> shouldn't be abused for things that aren't that. >>> >>> A couple of alternative approaches: >>> >>> 1: A new custom field with the modules/streams in it. User opens bug >>> against component, maintainer sets the CF if required. >>> >>> Pros: Easy to use. Could be a multi-select if it affects multiple streams. >>> >>> Cons: Might not scale to a large number of module streams. Doesn't allow >>> automated change of assignee/etc. Not easy to limit CF values to >>> specific components. >>> >>> 2: Use sub-components for the modules/streams. User opens a bug against >>> the component and the maintainer can move the bug to a module sub >>> component if required. >> >> Are sub-components used in our BZ already? Do you have some example? > RHEL has been using them for a long time for the kernel, but a less > dramatic example is the Bugzilla product. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&columnlist=product%2Ccomponent%2Crh_sub_components%2Cassigned_to%2Cshort_desc&product=Bugzilla
Interesting. Thx for the example. Not that it makes the decision which way would I prefer any easier ;) Vít > Cheers, Jeff. > > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
