On 01/02/18 01:34, Jeremy Linton wrote:
On 01/31/2018 09:49 AM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 01:52:49PM -0600, Jeremy Linton wrote:
Have you tried this with a '-o nfsvers=3' during mount? Did that help?
I noticed a large decrease in my kernel build times across NFS/lan a
whi
On Wed, 2018-01-31 at 10:06 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 01/28/2018 05:31 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2018-01-24 at 20:22 +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
> > > OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180117.n.1
> > > NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180123.n.1
> >
> > We've had a couple of these odd duplicate
- Original Message -
> From: "Owen Taylor"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Cc: gol...@lists.fedoraproject.org, "Discussion of RPM packaging standards
> and practices for Fedora"
>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 6:50:21 PM
> Subject: Re: [Fedora-packaging
On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 04:48:50AM +, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just applied all recent updates and seems after this now mc is not able
> recognize correctly number of available colors on gnome-terminal and xterm,
> and on gnome-terminal cursors are not working now.
It seems to be an sl
- Mail original -
De: "Owen Taylor"
Hi Owen,
> Is there a guide for Fedora packagers about how to handle unbundling for
> golang packages? The draft guidelines don't seem to go into any details.
I don't think there is, nor that it is necessarily needed. The posted
guidelines should be
- Original Message -
> From: "nicolas mailhot"
> To: gol...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Cc: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
> , "Discussion of RPM packaging
> standards and practices for Fedora"
> Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2018 11:21:59 AM
> Subject: Re: [Fedora-packagin
On 01/25/2018 07:17 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>
> zdohnal system-config-printer
Done.
--
Zdenek Dohnal
Associate Software Engineer
Red Hat Czech - Brno TPB-C
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- d
On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 10:50:59AM +0100, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> It seems to be an slang issue, not supporting the new format. There
> was a report on the ncurses list:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-ncurses/2018-01/msg00052.html
>
> I'm not sure how difficult it will be to fix/update
Hi All,
For the "Improved Laptop Battery Life" feature:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ImprovedLaptopBatteryLife
I'm working on for Fedora 28 I would like to also try and enable
Panel Self Refresh on laptops with Intel graphics, some quick tests
have shown this to save another 0.5W (when
Hi Nicolas,
I'm embarrassed to admit that before I sent my mail I carefully read over
... the old PackageDrafts/Go :-( My only excuse is that it was in my
browser history.
Having actually read the relevant parts of "More Go Packaging", the
explanation of compat packages and notification procedure
On 1 February 2018 at 11:28, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 10:50:59AM +0100, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> > It seems to be an slang issue, not supporting the new format. There
> > was a report on the ncurses list:
> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-ncurses/2018-01/msg00052
De: "Jakub Cajka"
Hi Jakub,
> It depends (as everything) on available manpower, if you are willing to own
> your dependencies
> you can package anything and everything debundled.
Sure, but available manpower depends on how high the bar you put for people
wanting to join, and right now this b
- Original Message -
> From: "nicolas mailhot"
> To: gol...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Cc: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
> , "Discussion of RPM packaging
> standards and practices for Fedora"
> Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2018 2:51:13 PM
> Subject: Re: [Fedora-packaging
De: "Owen Taylor"
> I'm embarrassed to admit that before I sent my mail I carefully read over
> ... the old PackageDrafts/Go :-( My only excuse is that it was in my
> browser history.
NP, that gave you some context on where Fedora is today.
> Having actually read the relevant parts of "More Go P
De: "Jakub Cajka"
>> Filling upstream holes is pretty much the definition of an
>> integrator/distributor role. In Go they are particularly numerous and deep,
>> but Fedora users do want their docker and kubernetes (and Kubernetes, BTW,
>> is astonishingly free of the problems that plague many Go
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 07:34:24PM -0600, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> On 01/31/2018 09:49 AM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > In the kernel compile case there's probably also a lot of re-opening and
> > re-reading files too? NFSv4 is chattier there too. Read delegations
> > should help compensate, but we n
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2018-02-01 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. uitime):
= Day: Thursday ==
2018-02-01 09:00 PST US/Pacific
2018-02-01 1
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 12:29 AM, Sinny Kumari wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 11:56 PM, Josh Boyer
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 12:42 PM, Daniel Walsh wrote:
>>> On 01/30/2018 11:50 AM, Jan Kurik wrote:
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Atomic, Cloud and Docker images for
On 02/01/2018 05:49 AM, Jakub Cajka wrote:
On contrary Fedora is trying to fill the hole that upstream Go projects dug them selves in to.
IMNHO Go have traded any subjectively perceived "RPM/deb hell" for even deeper levels of
"Go (vendor) hell".
This unfortunately became a trend: "the old pa
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 03:44:22PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 11:42:57AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > We could either look at modifying the ExternalRedirecct
> > > extension to be something like DocsRedirect and hard-code the
> Annnd https://pagure.io/fedora-in
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018, at 10:44 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 12:29 AM, Sinny Kumari wrote:
>
> So Dan... OCI images for sure but in the context of Fedora users and
> other deliverables, Docker images isn't really wrong. Plus, I just
> like giving you crap ;)
I usually say Dock
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018, at 10:24 AM, nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote:
>
> Not directly. It does provide the means to easily rev a spec to a new
> code state (version tag or commit), and it makes deps systematic (so
> Fedora tooling can accurately detect what is likely to be impacted by a
> cha
On Wed, 2018-01-31 at 09:43 -0800, Howard Howell wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-01-31 at 14:14 +0100, Olivier Fourdan wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 1:58 PM, Olivier Fourdan > om> wrote:
> > > Jan 31 01:14:08 school gnome-session[1715]: gnome-session-
> > > binary[1715]: WARNING: App 'org.g
- Original Message -
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 12:34:50PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > For the "Improved Laptop Battery Life" feature:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ImprovedLaptopBatteryLife
> >
> > I'm working on for Fedora 28 I would like to also try an
On Thursday, January 18, 2018 6:11:31 PM CET Petr Viktorin wrote:
> On 01/17/2018 12:38 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 01:02:32PM -0800, Troy Dawson wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >> Python3 will be in the next major RHEL release. I don't mean RHEL
> >> 7.6, but with numbers highe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting onirc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2018
De: "Colin Walters"
> I appreciate the work you're doing here,
Thank you
> but I think the right path for golang (indeed for most other language
> ecosystems) is to autogenerate
> specs.
You're, of course, are entitled to your opinion, but I do not share it :) I
think rpm has been an incred
I think I have found a shortcoming in
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Commit_Revision
Github line, which is
Source0:
https://github.com/OWNER/%{name}/archive/%{commit}/%{name}-%{shortcommit}.tar.gz
but I am not sure, so I have not made any edit to the wiki page.
In my case I am
Missing expected images:
Workstation live i386
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 9/129 (x86_64), 4/22 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180131.n.0):
ID: 190209 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/190209
On vendredi 2 février 2018 00:42:07 CET Germano Massullo wrote:
> I think I have found a shortcoming in
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Commit_Revision
> Github line, which is
> Source0:
> https://github.com/OWNER/%{name}/archive/%{commit}/%{name}-%{shortcommit}.ta
> r.gz but I
On vendredi 2 février 2018 00:42:07 CET Germano Massullo wrote:
> I think I have found a shortcoming in
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Commit_Revision
> Github line, which is
> Source0:
> https://github.com/OWNER/%{name}/archive/%{commit}/%{name}-%{shortcommit}.ta
> r.gz but I
Thank you
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 1 February 2018 at 23:42, Germano Massullo
wrote:
[,..]
> you will obviously get
>
> error: File /home/user/rpmbuild/SOURCES/bettercap-ng-eb1a53e.tar.gz: No
> such file or directory.
>
> Therefore I think wiki line
>
> Source0: https://github.com/OWNER/%{name}/archive/%{commit}/%{
> name}-%{sh
On vendredi 2 février 2018 01:21:55 CET Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> On 1 February 2018 at 23:42, Germano Massullo
> wrote:
> [,..]
>
> > you will obviously get
> >
> > error: File /home/user/rpmbuild/SOURCES/bettercap-ng-eb1a53e.tar.gz: No
> > such file or directory.
> >
> > Therefore I think wiki
Quick hint I have learned and here is the example for COPR Scribus spec
file:
https://github.com/%{name}project/%{name}/archive/master.tar.gz#/%{name}-%{version}-%{build_timestamp}git.tar.gz
Note the hash tag meant to rename the package.
Luya
On 2018-02-01 03:42 PM, Germano Massullo wrote:
> I
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 9:14 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 12:29 AM, Sinny Kumari wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 11:56 PM, Josh Boyer
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 12:42 PM, Daniel Walsh wrote:
On 01/30/2018 11:50 AM, Jan Kurik wrote:
>
> = Proposed Self
On 02/02/18 04:47, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
Quick hint I have learned and here is the example for COPR Scribus spec
file:
https://github.com/%{name}project/%{name}/archive/master.tar.gz#/%{name}-%{version}-%{build_timestamp}git.tar.gz
Note the hash tag meant to rename the package.
That is a
37 matches
Mail list logo
