On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 12:45 AM, Fabio Alessandro Locati
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 08:38:04AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 09:12:26PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> > >* Why is it not proposed for F26 (now the deadline is over, but IMHO it
>> > >should get in)?
>>
Hello Guys,
bluetooth is broken. I installed all xfce4 package and xfe-bluetooth did not
installed (dependency). The package can be straight forward compiled from
fedora.
http://centos.cms4all.org/repo/7/other/SRPMS/xfce-bluetooth-0-0.5.20150130git.el7.centos.src.rpm
on my private server.
Sin
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Ryniker"
To: devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Cc: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2017 5:23:43 PM
Subject: Re: F26 Self Contained Change: Making sudo pip Safe (Again)
>> System-python makes sense: a Python environment ded
- Original Message -
From: "Jason L Tibbitts III"
To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2017 6:33:36 PM
Subject: Re: F26 Self Contained Change: Making sudo pip Safe (Again)
> "JK" == Jan Kurik writes:
> JK> We aim to move the working directory
- Original Message -
From: "Adam Williamson"
To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2017 6:12:33 PM
Subject: Re: F26 Self Contained Change: Making sudo pip Safe (Again)
...
>> In addition, system-python—a
>> stripped down version of Python 3 for use
Hi,
On 06-02-17 23:01, Jan Pokorný wrote:
On 06/02/17 15:13 -0500, Christian Schaller wrote:
There has been a lot of discussions for the last few years about glvnd on
the mesa-devel list and at XDC. This is not Fedora specific technology, but
a change in how Mesa will work everywhere and thus t
Hi!
The gsoap package has been updated to version 2.8.43 in rawhide only.
Dependent packages should rebuild.
However, the mass rebuild is scheduled to start this week so just
leaving it to be fixed by the mass rebuild is very much OK.
$ dnf repoquery --releasever rawhide --srpm --whatrequires gso
Dne 7.2.2017 v 11:32 Michal Cyprian napsal(a):
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jason L Tibbitts III"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2017 6:33:36 PM
> Subject: Re: F26 Self Contained Change: Making sudo pip Safe (Again)
>
>> "JK" ==
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419919
Bug ID: 1419919
Summary: perl-Devel-Symdump-2.18 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Devel-Symdump
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: jple
Am 07.02.2017 um 13:07 schrieb Mattias Ellert:
Hi!
The gsoap package has been updated to version 2.8.43 in rawhide only.
Dependent packages should rebuild.
However, the mass rebuild is scheduled to start this week so just
leaving it to be fixed by the mass rebuild is very much OK.
$ dnf repoque
On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 13:08 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 7.2.2017 v 11:32 Michal Cyprian napsal(a):
> > Ruby on Fedora uses /usr/local/share/gems/ for packages installed
> > as a root via gem tool for many years.
>
> Since you refer to Ruby, I just want to highlight that
> /usr/local/share/gems
> On 6 Feb 2017, at 22:01, Jan Pokorný wrote:
>
> On 06/02/17 15:13 -0500, Christian Schaller wrote:
>> There has been a lot of discussions for the last few years about glvnd on
>> the mesa-devel list and at XDC. This is not Fedora specific technology, but
>> a change in how Mesa will work ever
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 05:32:59AM -0500, Michal Cyprian wrote:
> Ruby on Fedora uses /usr/local/share/gems/ for packages installed as
> a root via gem tool for many years.
And FWIW, this change was made for Perl, too, back in the dawn of time.
(Possibly in RHL pre-Fedora?)
--
Matthew Miller
Fe
Once upon a time, Matthew Miller said:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 05:32:59AM -0500, Michal Cyprian wrote:
> > Ruby on Fedora uses /usr/local/share/gems/ for packages installed as
> > a root via gem tool for many years.
>
> And FWIW, this change was made for Perl, too, back in the dawn of time.
> (
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 08:40:08AM -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
> > And FWIW, this change was made for Perl, too, back in the dawn of time.
> > (Possibly in RHL pre-Fedora?)
>
> It was later than that - between RHEL 5 (based on FC 6) and RHEL 6
> (based on F 12/13).
>
> However, this is another case
On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 08:40 -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
> However, this is another case where sudo having a different PATH than
> the normal shell comes into play as an irritant... installing modules
> (or gems, etc.) that include executables puts them in /usr/local/bin,
> which works from the shell
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64
Workstation live i386
Kde live x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Workstation live x86_64
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 66/85 (x86_64), 16/16 (i386)
ID: 56575 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_de
libgit2
- cargo
. Needs re-bootstrapping because of circular dependencies
+ geany-plugins
+ git-evtag
- julia
. Error: nothing provides libgfortran.so.3()(64bit) needed by
openblas-threads-
0.2.19-4.fc26.x86_64
- kf5-ktexteditor
. No matching package to install: 'kf5-kparts-devel >= 5.31'
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 6:00 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 06-02-17 23:01, Jan Pokorný wrote:
>>
>> On 06/02/17 15:13 -0500, Christian Schaller wrote:
>>>
>>> There has been a lot of discussions for the last few years about glvnd on
>>> the mesa-devel list and at XDC. This is not Fedora spe
- Original Message -
> From: "Rich Mattes"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2017 12:33:45 PM
> Subject: Re: The glvnd + mesa update for F25
>
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 6:00 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 06-02-17 23:01, Ja
On 02/06/2017 03:16 AM, den...@ausil.us wrote:
Fedup has not existed for a few releases now. The upgrades are handled by dnf
alone.
Yes, but the command does still exist as a functional alias.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
T
On 01/31/2017 12:02 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 7:33 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
How do LVM RAID volumes get tested? There's a regular cron job for
testing MD RAID volumes, but I'm not aware of something like that for
LVM RAID.
I'm not aware of an upstream cron job for this; n
On 02/07/2017 12:27 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 01/31/2017 12:02 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 7:33 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
>>> How do LVM RAID volumes get tested? There's a regular cron job for
>>> testing MD RAID volumes, but I'm not aware of something like that for
>>> LVM
On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 12:27:20 -0800
Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 01/31/2017 12:02 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 7:33 AM, Chris Adams
> > wrote:
> >> How do LVM RAID volumes get tested? There's a regular cron job for
> >> testing MD RAID volumes, but I'm not aware of something l
It's been a tradition now that every January we rebuild all the Fedora packages
with the upcoming GCC, to reveal as many bugs as possible before we release
the new version. This year is no different.
There were 18811 packages overall (last year we had 17741 packages).
17263 built fine with the ne
My opinion of the change is limited to whether gnome-shell will still
notify the user of device failures; if not, or if unknown then I think
the change should be rejected as lack of device failure notifications
in the DE is a regression that outweighs the benefit. It's
Chris Murphy
__
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 8:47 AM, Simon Farnsworth wrote:
>
>> On 6 Feb 2017, at 22:01, Jan Pokorný wrote:
>>
>> On 06/02/17 15:13 -0500, Christian Schaller wrote:
>>> There has been a lot of discussions for the last few years about glvnd on
>>> the mesa-devel list and at XDC. This is not Fedora sp
Hi,
On Ter, 2017-02-07 at 22:32 +0100, Marek Polacek wrote:
> some C++ FE changes (especially the "Fix type-dependence
> and the current instantiation" changes made the compiler to reject
> invalid code
> that had previously been accepted, plus invalid conversions with '\0'
> are now
> rejected)
On 7 February 2017 at 18:39, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hi,
> On Ter, 2017-02-07 at 22:32 +0100, Marek Polacek wrote:
>> some C++ FE changes (especially the "Fix type-dependence
>> and the current instantiation" changes made the compiler to reject
>> invalid code
>> that had previously been accepted, p
On 07/02/17 23:56, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 7 February 2017 at 18:39, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Hi,
On Ter, 2017-02-07 at 22:32 +0100, Marek Polacek wrote:
some C++ FE changes (especially the "Fix type-dependence
and the current instantiation" changes made the compiler to reject
invalid code
t
On Ter, 2017-02-07 at 18:56 -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 7 February 2017 at 18:39, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > On Ter, 2017-02-07 at 22:32 +0100, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > >
> > > some C++ FE changes (especially the "Fix type-dependence
> > > and the current instantiation" chan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1420143
Bug ID: 1420143
Summary: perl-List-AllUtils-0.14 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-List-AllUtils
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: ppi.
On 7 February 2017 at 19:14, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Ter, 2017-02-07 at 18:56 -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> On 7 February 2017 at 18:39, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> > On Ter, 2017-02-07 at 22:32 +0100, Marek Polacek wrote:
>> > >
>> > > some C++ FE changes (especially the "Fix t
On 7 February 2017 at 18:59, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 07/02/17 23:56, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>>
>> On 7 February 2017 at 18:39, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> On Ter, 2017-02-07 at 22:32 +0100, Marek Polacek wrote:
some C++ FE changes (especially the "Fix type-dependence
an
On 08/02/17 00:14, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Ter, 2017-02-07 at 18:56 -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 7 February 2017 at 18:39, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Hi,
On Ter, 2017-02-07 at 22:32 +0100, Marek Polacek wrote:
some C++ FE changes (especially the "Fix type-dependence
and the current instant
On Ter, 2017-02-07 at 19:19 -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 7 February 2017 at 19:14, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >
> > On Ter, 2017-02-07 at 18:56 -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > >
> > > On 7 February 2017 at 18:39, Sérgio Basto
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > > On Te
On 02/07/2017 03:30 AM, andr...@benzlerweb.de wrote:
> Hello Guys,
>
> bluetooth is broken. I installed all xfce4 package and xfe-bluetooth did not
> installed (dependency).
The package can be straight forward compiled from fedora.
>
> http://centos.cms4all.org/repo/7/other/SRPMS/xfce-blueto
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 10:32:09PM +0100, Marek Polacek wrote:
> ocp-0.1.22-0.10.git849cc42.fc26.src.rpm
> These are not ready for a new gcc version (gcc -dumpversion says '7'
> and not e.g. '6.3.1') and the packages fail to cope with that.
Fixed, thanks.
__
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 11:59:33PM +, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 07/02/17 23:56, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > On 7 February 2017 at 18:39, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > On Ter, 2017-02-07 at 22:32 +0100, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > > > some C++ FE changes (especially the "Fix type-dependence
39 matches
Mail list logo
