> > You can see all results, find testing instructions and image download
> > locations, and enter results on the Summary page:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_22_Branched_20150217_Summary
> >
> > The individual test result pages are:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wik
On 17.2.2015 12:33, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
Not that I know of.
On 02/16/2015 09:50 AM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
Thanks! Are there tracking bugs in Bugzilla I can subscribe to?
I don't think there are any - feel free to file it.
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On
commit d233c6780e8934022f979a5aa9b7795174e6e10b
Author: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Wed Feb 18 10:02:43 2015 +0100
Provide 5.20.2 MODULE_COMPAT; Clean up list of provided files
20.2-Fix-Errno.pm-generation-for-gcc-5.0.patch |0
2-Install-libperl.so-to-shrpdir-on-Linux.patch |0
On 2015-02-18, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
> Compose started at Wed Feb 18 05:15:03 UTC 2015
> Broken deps for i386
[...]
> GraphicsMagick-perl-1.3.20-5.fc23.i686 requires
> perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.2)
This was a mistake in perl-5.20.2-320 and will be fixed in
perl-5.20.2-321 very soon (F
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 5:20 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> I'm continuing the nonresponsive maintainer process for Axel Thimm
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186467
+1
> I've been effectively maintaining a number of Axel's packages for years now.
> Time to get them properly owned.
Dne 17.2.2015 v 17:18 Petr Pisar napsal(a):
> On 2015-02-17, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Stephen Gallagher
>> wrote:
>>> == Proposal ==
>>> With these things in mind, I'd like to propose that we amend the
>>> packaging policy by splitting it into two forms:
>> I think th
The following packages have build failures, and I'm going to fix them
now, except where noted below:
- xen
Xen maintainer asked me not to rebuild this.
- llvm
LLVM seems to have generic FTBFS problems unrelated to OCaml.
- plplot
- ocaml-zarith
- ocaml-tplib
- ocaml-xmlrpc-light
- frama-c
- w
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:05:43AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> - plplot
I believe this one is a general FTBFS problem, rather than anything to
do with OCaml.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=612220
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.r
Hi
>
> What is wrong with using Copr for the "ring packages". It already works
> just fine (may be BZ is missing). There are no reviews, no guidelines,
> you can bundle ... I believe that everybody understands that while Copr
> is supported by Fedora, you are using these packages on your own risk
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2015-02-18 18:00 UTC'
Links to all tickets belo
Dne 18.2.2015 v 12:52 Rahul Sundaram napsal(a):
>
> Hi
>
>
>
> What is wrong with using Copr for the "ring packages". It already
> works
> just fine (may be BZ is missing). There are no reviews, no guidelines,
> you can bundle ... I believe that everybody understands that wh
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:05:43AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> - llvm
>
> LLVM seems to have generic FTBFS problems unrelated to OCaml.
FWIW the LLVM failure is:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=612484
In file included from
/builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-3.5.0.src/projec
An update on ghc-7.8 progress:
> [Agda]
> [Agda-stdlib]
Newer Agda which builds with ghc-7.8 needs some new deps:
equivalence, data-hash, boxes, STMonadTrans, and tf-random -> QuickCheck >=
2.7.5.
Possibily it could also be moved to Copr if there is little interest.
> [cab]
Newer cab needs ne
Hello all,
Apologies on the necromancy here, but I finally did find the patches (after
wrestling with the fact that I can't "see" the patch tracker website for
some reason... is it still live?) that created it. The patches are hosted
on Debian's git for packages[0]. There's some other stuff relate
Summary of changes:
2973eec... 1.01 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/l
On Mon, 2015-02-16 at 17:03 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> So, for my counterproposal:
> I propose that packagers with a sufficient level of trust (packager
> sponsors, provenpackagers, or a new, yet-to-be-defined group (maybe
> packagers with at least N packages)) be allowed to import new packa
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 08:58:34AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-02-16 at 17:03 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > So, for my counterproposal:
> > I propose that packagers with a sufficient level of trust (packager
> > sponsors, provenpackagers, or a new, yet-to-be-defined group (mayb
On 02/18/2015 04:26 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:05:43AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
- plplot
I believe this one is a general FTBFS problem, rather than anything to
do with OCaml.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=612220
Rich.
Yes it is.
On Tue, 2015-02-17 at 10:44 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:21:47AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > I may have misunderstood the conversation I'm remembering. Apologies
> > for any confusion.
>
> The main issue is that we as a project can't take any money, even if Google
On 02/18/2015 05:32 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:05:43AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
- llvm
LLVM seems to have generic FTBFS problems unrelated to OCaml.
FWIW the LLVM failure is:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=612484
In file included f
On 2015-02-18, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 18.2.2015 v 12:52 Rahul Sundaram napsal(a):
>>
>> What is wrong with using Copr for the "ring packages". It already
>> works
>> just fine (may be BZ is missing). There are no reviews, no guidelin=
> es,
>> you can bundle ... I believe that ev
I rebuilt libcutl the other day and then noticed that later boost was
rebuilt. libcutl depends on boost, so is it a problem that it was rebuilt
before boost was?
Thanks,
Dave
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of C
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 8:11 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
>
>
>
> I'll talk to OSAS today. If no one else wants to step up and coordinate
> this, I'll do it.
/me and number80 are working on the application. I will also talk to
OSAS to make
sure that we all are in same page.
Meanwhile if you hav
I'm running into an issue where odb won't build on rawhide (
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8966447 ) and I need to
be able to take a look at the config.log file but it's not available from
the standard koji output.
So what's the easiest way for me to get access to that file? D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 5 Feb 2015 14:30:40 -0500
Ralph Bean wrote:
> As previously announced[1], the infrastructure team is going to be
> adding all of the members of the packager group to the new
> fedmsg notifications system (FMN)[2].
>
> It is currently an opt-
On 18/02/15 15:12, Dave Johansen wrote:
I'm running into an issue where odb won't build on rawhide (
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8966447 ) and I need
to be able to take a look at the config.log file but it's not available
from the standard koji output.
So what's the easies
On 02/18/2015 04:12 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
> I'm running into an issue where odb won't build on rawhide (
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8966447
> ) and I need to be able to take a look at the config.log file but it's not
> available from the standard koji output.
>
> So
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 08:04:53AM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote:
> I rebuilt libcutl the other day and then noticed that later boost was
> rebuilt. libcutl depends on boost, so is it a problem that it was rebuilt
> before boost was?
Yes. Jakub Jelinek wrote on this list:
Also, a releng mass reb
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 06:13:23PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >Core vs. Extras.) But no one is proposing a _society_-based distinction
> >— instead, a _technical_ one.
>
> I know and understand this, but I expect the outcome to be the same:
>
> Ring 0 == Red Hat
> Ring 1 == The Red Hat busine
On 18.02.2015 16:31, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> On 02/18/2015 04:12 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
>> I'm running into an issue where odb won't build on rawhide (
>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8966447
>> ) and I need to be able to take a look at the config.log file but it's not
>>
It was intended to request that the FCAI takes ownership over
the GSoC application.
Since Remi hasn't started yet, we will collectively bootstrap the
application. As for daily management, with Kushal, we involved
the mentors in decision-making. The most important is to have
a single representative
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Richard W.M. Jones
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 08:04:53AM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote:
> > I rebuilt libcutl the other day and then noticed that later boost was
> > rebuilt. libcutl depends on boost, so is it a problem that it was rebuilt
> > before boost was?
Fedora is a big project, and it’s hard to keep up with everything. This
series highlights interesting happenings in five different areas every
week. It isn’t comprehensive news coverage — just quick summaries with
links to each. Here are the five things for February 18th, 2015:
FUDCon1 Flashback
I've got a build process that uses Live Media Creator instead of Image
Factory if it'll help - see
https://bitbucket.org/znmeb/osjourno/src/344cb38b042e352f6198e789ddeeb8654a7a96ed/4Experimental/LiveMediaCreator/
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 1:06 AM, Václav Pavlín wrote:
>
> On 17.2.2015 12:33, Daniel
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:39:16AM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Richard W.M. Jones
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 08:04:53AM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote:
> > > I rebuilt libcutl the other day and then noticed that later boost was
> > > rebuilt. libcutl dep
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 22 Branched 20150218. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2015-02-18)
===
Meeting started by jwb at 18:00:36 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2015-02-18/fesco.2015-02-18-18.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
The package rebuild is now complete.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and
build Windows installers. Over 10
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 09:02:47AM -0700, Jason Rist wrote:
> On 02/17/2015 02:19 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > There are some packages I don't use anymore, feel free to take them:
> >
> > libntlm
> > python-durus
> > barry
> > spambayes
> > rblcheck
> > tokyocabinet
> > jaxodraw
>
On 02/18/2015 12:21 PM, adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
> for Fedora 22 Branched 20150218. Please help run some tests for this
> nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
> release valida
fedup --network rawhide --nogpgcheck
- a bit of progress
- it downloads ~1500 packages
- it lists a screen full of packages without update
- I reboot with the added boot menu entry
upgrade prep complete, switching root
failed to log coredump - connection refused
An early end. Nothing happens
On February 18, 2015 1:29:49 PM PST, Michael Schwendt
wrote:
>fedup --network rawhide --nogpgcheck
>
> - a bit of progress
> - it downloads ~1500 packages
> - it lists a screen full of packages without update
> - I reboot with the added boot menu entry
>
>upgrade prep complete, switching root
>fa
On February 18, 2015 12:15:27 AM PST, Kamil Paral wrote:
>> > You can see all results, find testing instructions and image
>download
>> > locations, and enter results on the Summary page:
>> >
>> >
>https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_22_Branched_20150217_Summary
>> >
>> > The indiv
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Richard W.M. Jones
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:39:16AM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Richard W.M. Jones
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 08:04:53AM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote:
> > > > I rebuilt libcutl the o
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2015-02-19 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2015-02-19 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PST
2015-02-19 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EST
2015-02-19 1
On Tue, 2015-02-17 at 17:31 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> -> English
> > (because the translation could be out-of-date, it doesn't
> > mention
> > fedup at all, and the links to koji aren't fast either
> > when
> > showing the list of images to download - a slow koji query!)
>
> Y
a, you can find the same links
with 'fedfind images --release 22 --compose 20150218').
You can use the boot.iso , but note that using that will by default
use the repos from the development/22 tree, so whether it works for a
given package set on a given day will depend on whether there ar
HEADS UP -- new time and place; since we would have a collision in
#fedora-meeting and it seems to be better to have meetings on the same
channel every week, let's meet at #fedora-meeting-1.
WG meeting will be at 18:00 UTC (13:00 EST, 19:00 Brno, 13:00 Boston,
3:00+1d Tokyo, 4:00+1d Brisbane)
48 matches
Mail list logo
