On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjo...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:39:16AM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjo...@redhat.com> > > wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 08:04:53AM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote: > > > > I rebuilt libcutl the other day and then noticed that later boost was > > > > rebuilt. libcutl depends on boost, so is it a problem that it was > rebuilt > > > > before boost was? > > > > > > Yes. Jakub Jelinek wrote on this list: > > > > > > <quote> > > > Also, a releng mass rebuild, which I believe is a random package > order, > > > would very likely not help very much, due to the ABI changes one > needs to > > > rebuild the packages in topological order, non-C++ packages or C++ > > > packages > > > that nothing C++ depends on of course can be left for the mass > rebuild, > > > but > > > ideally the rest should be rebuilt manually before the mass rebuild. > > > </quote> > > > > > > > I had read through the original "results of a test mass rebuild" and > didn't > > notice anything like that. Sorry for the oversight on my part and thanks > > for the info. > > I sound a bit accusatory there. Wasn't meant that way :-) I don't > read even a tenth of all the email lists I'm subscribed to either .. > No worries. I was very appreciative of the help and the quick response.
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
