On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjo...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 08:04:53AM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote: > > I rebuilt libcutl the other day and then noticed that later boost was > > rebuilt. libcutl depends on boost, so is it a problem that it was rebuilt > > before boost was? > > Yes. Jakub Jelinek wrote on this list: > > <quote> > Also, a releng mass rebuild, which I believe is a random package order, > would very likely not help very much, due to the ABI changes one needs to > rebuild the packages in topological order, non-C++ packages or C++ > packages > that nothing C++ depends on of course can be left for the mass rebuild, > but > ideally the rest should be rebuilt manually before the mass rebuild. > </quote> > I had read through the original "results of a test mass rebuild" and didn't notice anything like that. Sorry for the oversight on my part and thanks for the info. Dave
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
