How to take ownership of orphaned package: ddclient

Hi, I would like to take over this orphaned package: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/orphaned/ https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/ddclient/ According to this webpage I should notify this email list: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers I ha

rawhide report: 20141223 changes

Compose started at Tue Dec 23 05:15:07 UTC 2014 Broken deps for i386 -- [3Depict] 3Depict-0.0.16-3.fc22.i686 requires libmgl.so.7.2.0 [Sprog] Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0) [aeskulap] aes

Re: Review swaps

Hi, sqlitebrowser still looking for a reviewer :) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173375 Thanks! Sandro -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Review swaps

El 2014-12-23 15:41, Sandro Mani escribió: Hi, sqlitebrowser still looking for a reviewer :) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173375 Thanks! Sandro Taken. -- Juan Orti https://miceliux.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm

Re: no error handling in Yum any more?

On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 05:20:01PM +, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 22/12/14 17:07, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > >On Mon, 22 Dec 2014 05:59:50 +0100, Felix Miata wrote: > >>I started a yum upgrade process. When it reached 342/784 (@avahi) over half > >>an hour ago, the screen writing from the process simpl

CLI tools in Gnome Software?

Hi, RichiH, author of vcsh (one of my packages) and Debian contributor asked my whether we could upstream Fedora packaging (more precisely any packaging metadata). I simply showed him where the package's git repo and we agreed I would notify him when I commit stuff. Btw, is there a simple way to s

Re: Qwt and QwtPolar for Qt5?

Dave Johansen wrote: > I would like to create Qwt and QwtPolar packages for Qt5 and before > opening the Bugzilla I wanted to check if there was any feedback on here. > I have spec files and source RPMs available at: > https://daveisfera.fedorapeople.org/qwt-qt5/qwt-qt5.spec > https://daveisfera.f

Re: Wiki upload rights

On Sat, 20 Dec 2014 19:05:24 +0100 "valent.turko...@gmail.com" wrote: > Hi, > wiki admins please enable upload rights for "valentt" account so that > I can continue contributing to wiki. All Fedora accounts can upload and edit the wiki (aside from some protected namespaces like legal or packagin

Re: How to take ownership of orphaned package: ddclient

On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 10:34:01 +0100 Kees de Jong wrote: > Hi, > > > > I would like to take over this orphaned package: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/orphaned/ > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/ddclient/ > > According to this webpage I should notify this email list: > ht

Where should a package place facter facts?

Following the example set by other packages, I've traditionally used /usr/local/share/ruby/site_ruby/facter/MY_PACKAGE, but what if you have a fact that isn't written in Ruby? I'm also aware of /etc/facter/facts.d but I suspect that's considered inappropriate for a package to use and should be

Re: CLI tools in Gnome Software?

On Tue, 2014-12-23 at 17:12 +0100, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > Are CLI tools welcome in Gnome > Software? No, we don't consider CLI tools to be "applications," and only applications should be displayed in GNOME Software. See also: https://developer.gnome.org/hig/stable/application-basics.html.en

Re: Where should a package place facter facts?

On 12/23/2014 10:24 AM, John Florian wrote: Following the example set by other packages, I’ve traditionally used /usr/local/share/ruby/site_ruby/facter/MY_PACKAGE, but what if you have a fact that isn’t written in Ruby? I’m also aware of /etc/facter/facts.d but I suspect that’s considered inappr

Re: Where should a package place facter facts?

Am 23.12.2014 um 20:03 schrieb Samuel Sieb: On 12/23/2014 10:24 AM, John Florian wrote: Following the example set by other packages, I’ve traditionally used /usr/local/share/ruby/site_ruby/facter/MY_PACKAGE, but what if you have a fact that isn’t written in Ruby? I’m also aware of /etc/facter

Incorrect FSF Address error from rpmlint

I'm getting an incorrect FSF address when I'm building a package. I checked here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#incorrect-fsf-address and built the package with the recommended file. Still get the error. I checked the address with FSF, and what is in the COPYING file match

Re: Incorrect FSF Address error from rpmlint

On 2014-12-23 20:28, Gerald B. Cox wrote: I'm getting an incorrect FSF address when I'm building a package. I checked here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#incorrect-fsf-address and built the package with the recommended file. Still get the error. I checked the address wit

RE: Where should a package place facter facts?

> -Original Message- > From: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:devel- > boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Reindl Harald > Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 14:10 > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: Where should a package place facter facts? > > > > A

Re: Incorrect FSF Address error from rpmlint

On Tue, 2014-12-23 at 11:28 -0800, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > > Am I missing something here? What package are you building, and what is the output from rpmlint? That would help. It should point you to a specific file that it has flagged as containing the outdated postal address. (Be aware that thi

Re: Incorrect FSF Address error from rpmlint

On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Alec Leamas wrote: > The check is not only applied to COPYING but also to the license text in > source files. Have you checked those? Got it. Thanks! -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Wiki upload rights

On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sat, 20 Dec 2014 19:05:24 +0100 > "valent.turko...@gmail.com" wrote: > > > Hi, > > wiki admins please enable upload rights for "valentt" account so that > > I can continue contributing to wiki. > > All Fedora accounts can upload and edit t

Re: Incorrect FSF Address error from rpmlint

Upstream had a few files that had the old address. I've noticed the GPLv3 doesn't have an address in it's notice. Is it sufficient to instruct upstream to just remove the address for GPLv2. Not that they're going to move again, but seems to be alot of work for everybody if the address is actuall

Re: Incorrect FSF Address error from rpmlint

On 23/12/14 21:55, Gerald B. Cox wrote: On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Alec Leamas mailto:leamas.a...@gmail.com>> wrote: The check is not only applied to COPYING but also to the license text in source files. Have you checked those? Got it. Thanks! You're welcome. BTW, in man

Re: Incorrect FSF Address error from rpmlint

On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Alec Leamas wrote: > BTW, in many cases I been able to fix these problems by sending patches > rather than just complaints upstream. Basically, I think we (i. e. Fedora) > are the which are concerned about this, and in that situation we are the > ones motivated en

Re: Provides question

On 12/22/2014 09:46 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 12/23/2014 05:30 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: >> On 12/22/2014 09:21 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: >>> Cobbler ships a tftp server written in python that integrates with (and >>> requires) cobbler. Cobbler requires a tftp server, and it would be nice >

Chromium

Tom @ ncst.edu - hey perfect, thks for the repo solution - but in all our conversion confusion lost your email with the repo address and can't see it in archives - can you pls resend *>Gerald B. Cox* gbcox at bzb.us