Upstream had a few files that had the old address. I've noticed the GPLv3 doesn't have an address in it's notice. Is it sufficient to instruct upstream to just remove the address for GPLv2. Not that they're going to move again, but seems to be alot of work for everybody if the address is actually required.
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Michael Catanzaro <mcatanz...@gnome.org> wrote: > On Tue, 2014-12-23 at 11:28 -0800, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > > > > > Am I missing something here? > > What package are you building, and what is the output from rpmlint? That > would help. It should point you to a specific file that it has flagged > as containing the outdated postal address. > > (Be aware that this error has to be fixed in the upstream project, not > the Fedora package. As a Fedora packager, you can just ignore the error, > but it's good to report it upstream with a patch.) > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct >
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
