On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Andre Robatino
wrote:
>
> Kevin Kofler chello.at> writes:
>
> > I just happened to look at the firewalld default settings, and I was not
> > amused when I noticed this:
> > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/firewalld.git/tree/FedoraWorkstation.xml
> > >
> > >
Igor Gnatenko gmail.com> writes:
> you forget about DLNA sharing, and some more GNOME services.
I googled for "DLNA sharing" to find out which ports it uses, and it seems
that all of those ports are closed. Are there any specific ports you would
expect to be open?
BTW, I just realized that my r
On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 07:41:52 +0100
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just happened to look at the firewalld default settings, and I was
> not amused when I noticed this:
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/firewalld.git/tree/FedoraWorkstation.xml
> >
> >
> This "firewall" is a joke! ALL highe
Andre Robatino fedoraproject.org> writes:
> using. (BTW, Transmission now seems to automatically open an incoming port -
> in F20 and below I had to tell Transmission to use a fixed port instead of a
> random one, and manually open that port in the firewall.)
Forgot to mention that before, I als
tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:47147 0.0.0.0:*
LISTEN 15610/rygel
tcp0 0 192.168.122.1:59505 0.0.0.0:*
LISTEN 15610/rygel
tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:51413 0.0.0.0:*
LISTEN 13331/transmission-
tcp0 0 192.168.122.1:530.0.0.0:*
LIS
On 8 December 2014 at 08:38, Paul Howarth wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 07:41:52 +0100
> Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just happened to look at the firewalld default settings, and I was
>> not amused when I noticed this:
>> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/firewalld.git/tree/FedoraWorksta
Am 08.12.2014 um 07:41 schrieb Kevin Kofler:
I just happened to look at the firewalld default settings, and I was not
amused when I noticed this:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/firewalld.git/tree/FedoraWorkstation.xml
This "firewall" is a joke! ALL higher ports are wide open!
serio
Am 08.12.2014 um 09:38 schrieb Paul Howarth:
FWIW, this is mentioned in the release notes:
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/21/html/Release_Notes/sect-Products.html#Products-Workstation
2.3.3. Developer oriented firewall
Developers often run test servers that run on high numbered po
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
We don't need open or preconfigured high ports.
What we really need is a user notification with options to allow or
deny like we do with SELinux.
That would be a appropriate solution for a workstation.
On 08.12.2014 10:29, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
- Original Message -
> Hi,
>
> I just happened to look at the firewalld default settings, and I was not
> amused when I noticed this:
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/firewalld.git/tree/FedoraWorkstation.xml
> >
> >
> This "firewall" is a joke! ALL higher ports are wide open!
>
- Original Message -
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> We don't need open or preconfigured high ports.
>
> What we really need is a user notification with options to allow or
> deny like we do with SELinux.
>
> That would be a appropriate solution for a workstation.
Am 08.12.2014 um 10:34 schrieb Michael Spahn:
We don't need open or preconfigured high ports.
What we really need is a user notification with options to allow or
deny like we do with SELinux.
That would be a appropriate solution for a workstation.
* you know that
* i know that
* the same app
- Original Message -
>
> Am 08.12.2014 um 09:38 schrieb Paul Howarth:
> > FWIW, this is mentioned in the release notes:
> >
> > http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/21/html/Release_Notes/sect-Products.html#Products-Workstation
> >
> > 2.3.3. Developer oriented firewall
> >
> > Deve
Am 08.12.2014 um 10:48 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
I just happened to look at the firewalld default settings, and I was not
amused when I noticed this:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/firewalld.git/tree/FedoraWorkstation.xml
This "firewall" is a joke! ALL higher ports are wide open!
Ther
Am 08.12.2014 um 10:50 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
We don't need open or preconfigured high ports.
What we really need is a user notification with options to allow or
deny like we do with SELinux.
That would be a appropriate solution for a workstation.
No it wouldn't be, because users don't like
Am 08.12.2014 um 10:51 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
WTF - "developer oriented firewall" on workstation?
i doubt it is smart that by default my running Eclipse
accepts incoming connections from the WAN (that i am
paied for IT security prevents that but only here)
tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:20080
- Original Message -
>
> Am 08.12.2014 um 10:51 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
> >> WTF - "developer oriented firewall" on workstation?
> >>
> >> i doubt it is smart that by default my running Eclipse
> >> accepts incoming connections from the WAN (that i am
> >> paied for IT security prevents
- Original Message -
>
> Am 08.12.2014 um 10:50 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
> >> We don't need open or preconfigured high ports.
> >>
> >> What we really need is a user notification with options to allow or
> >> deny like we do with SELinux.
> >>
> >> That would be a appropriate solution for
Am 08.12.2014 um 11:26 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
Am 08.12.2014 um 10:51 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
WTF - "developer oriented firewall" on workstation?
i doubt it is smart that by default my running Eclipse
accepts incoming connections from the WAN (that i am
paied for IT security prevents that but
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 09:03:20PM +0100, Juan Orti wrote:
> Hi, I know how to manually configure the zram, but what's the best way
> to do it?
>
> I've seen the unit zram.service of anaconda-core, and it gets activated
> when booting with inst.zram=on, but it looks like very anaconda-centric.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Well, I'll understand these aspects.
But when I think about Linux, especially about Fedora, I'm thinking
about the freedom to make decisions. This means to me, to customize
and take advantage of my computer and in this case my operating system.
It's
Am 08.12.2014 um 11:32 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
Am 08.12.2014 um 10:50 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
We don't need open or preconfigured high ports.
What we really need is a user notification with options to allow or
deny like we do with SELinux.
That would be a appropriate solution for a workstati
- Original Message -
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Well, I'll understand these aspects.
>
> But when I think about Linux, especially about Fedora, I'm thinking
> about the freedom to make decisions. This means to me, to customize
> and take advantage of my comput
Am 08.12.2014 um 11:45 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
Well, I'll understand these aspects.
But when I think about Linux, especially about Fedora, I'm thinking
about the freedom to make decisions. This means to me, to customize
and take advantage of my computer and in this case my operating system.
Y
On Mon, 8 Dec 2014 11:36:47 +0100
Karel Zak wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 09:03:20PM +0100, Juan Orti wrote:
> > Hi, I know how to manually configure the zram, but what's the best
> > way to do it?
> >
> > I've seen the unit zram.service of anaconda-core, and it gets
> > activated when bootin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Probably this is not gnomish enough to him.
On 08.12.2014 11:48, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 08.12.2014 um 11:45 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
>>> Well, I'll understand these aspects.
>>>
>>> But when I think about Linux, especially about Fedora, I'm
>>>
- Original Message -
>
> Am 08.12.2014 um 11:45 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
> >> Well, I'll understand these aspects.
> >>
> >> But when I think about Linux, especially about Fedora, I'm thinking
> >> about the freedom to make decisions. This means to me, to customize
> >> and take advantage
It's not good UI for any OS, not just the ones based on GNOME.
- Original Message -
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Probably this is not gnomish enough to him.
>
> On 08.12.2014 11:48, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >
> > Am 08.12.2014 um 11:45 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
> >>
Am 08.12.2014 um 12:22 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
Am 08.12.2014 um 11:45 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
Well, I'll understand these aspects.
But when I think about Linux, especially about Fedora, I'm thinking
about the freedom to make decisions. This means to me, to customize
and take advantage of my c
- Original Message -
> From: "Bastien Nocera"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Monday, December 8, 2014 1:22:04 PM
> Subject: Re: "Workstation" Product defaults to wide-open firewall
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> >
> > Am 08.12.2014 um 11:45 schrie
On 08/12/14 12:10, Michael Spahn wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Probably this is not gnomish enough to him.
Hm... There's something strange familiar with this discussion... yes, in
[1] there are several threads on "Firewall blocking desktop features".
I can see both
- Original Message -
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Bastien Nocera"
> > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
> >
> > Sent: Monday, December 8, 2014 1:22:04 PM
> > Subject: Re: "Workstation" Product defaults to wide-open firewall
> >
> >
> >
> > - Original Me
Compose started at Mon Dec 8 05:15:03 UTC 2014
Broken deps for i386
--
[3Depict]
3Depict-0.0.16-3.fc22.i686 requires libmgl.so.7.2.0
[Sprog]
Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0)
[cab]
cab-0.1.
Am 08.12.2014 um 12:34 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
Am 08.12.2014 um 11:45 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
Well, I'll understand these aspects.
But when I think about Linux, especially about Fedora, I'm thinking
about the freedom to make decisions. This means to me, to customize
and take advantage of my c
- Original Message -
>
>
> Am 08.12.2014 um 12:34 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
> Am 08.12.2014 um 11:45 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
> >> Well, I'll understand these aspects.
> >>
> >> But when I think about Linux, especially about Fedora, I'm thinking
> >> about the freedom
- Original Message -
> From: "Reindl Harald"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Monday, December 8, 2014 1:26:29 PM
> Subject: Re: "Workstation" Product defaults to wide-open firewall
>
>
>
> Am 08.12.2014 um 12:22 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
> >> Am 08.12.2014 um 11:45 schrieb Bas
Am 08.12.2014 um 13:02 schrieb Aleksandar Kurtakov:
- Original Message -
From: "Reindl Harald"
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Monday, December 8, 2014 1:26:29 PM
Subject: Re: "Workstation" Product defaults to wide-open firewall
Am 08.12.2014 um 12:22 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
On 8 December 2014 at 12:02, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Reindl Harald"
>> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Sent: Monday, December 8, 2014 1:26:29 PM
>> Subject: Re: "Workstation" Product defaults to wide-open firewall
>>
>>
>>
>> Am 08.12.2014 um 12:22
Change in package status over the last 168 hours
3 packages were orphaned
clucene09 [master] was orphaned by robert
A C++ port of Lucene
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/clucene09
libvmime [master] was
- Original Message -
> Well, it's in your hands now, and every application developer's hands,
> if RH is going to be turning the default firewall off.
Not Red Hat, Fedora. And it's not off by default either. It's disabled
for user applications, not root ones.
--
devel mailing list
deve
Am 08.12.2014 um 13:39 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
Well, it's in your hands now, and every application developer's hands,
if RH is going to be turning the default firewall off.
Not Red Hat, Fedora. And it's not off by default either. It's disabled
for user applications, not root ones
and that is
- Original Message -
>
> Am 08.12.2014 um 13:39 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
> >> Well, it's in your hands now, and every application developer's hands,
> >> if RH is going to be turning the default firewall off.
> >
> > Not Red Hat, Fedora. And it's not off by default either. It's disabled
>
Am 08.12.2014 um 13:56 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
Am 08.12.2014 um 13:39 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
Well, it's in your hands now, and every application developer's hands,
if RH is going to be turning the default firewall off.
Not Red Hat, Fedora. And it's not off by default either. It's disabled
fo
On 12/05/2014 05:43 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Starting the non-reponsive maintainter process for vda - Denys Vlasenko -
> dvlas...@redhat.com as he appears to have completely abandoned busybox.
> Anyone know him or how to contact?
Hi. I'm here.
How can I help you?
--
devel mailing list
devel
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 07:56:28AM -0500, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> Rootkit won't require opened *server* ports. It will contact a command
> server through a client port, which requires no special privileges. If
> you blocked the firewall for user applications, you just made the
> system a pain to
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 12:11:40PM +, Ian Malone wrote:
> >> >>> You're free to select another firewall zone
> And free to move to another distro of course.
Well, or free to select another Fedora offering, or configure you
systems to not be Fedora Workstation.
The defaults are different in th
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 11:40:30AM +0100, Michael Spahn wrote:
> I hope it's not needed to mentions that we are not Ubuntu, Windows or
> OSx. We are a free and open Linux distribution and every step in
> another direction is an attack against the ideas of free open source
> and open mind.
Let's pl
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 08:14:36AM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> I can help as several months ago the budgie music player was packaged by
> myself. At that time the desktop was however unstable.
Thanks. The packaging is straightforward, for the most part. The
only sticky issue is the inclusion o
On 12/08/2014 12:51 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
- Original Message -
Am 08.12.2014 um 12:34 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
Am 08.12.2014 um 11:45 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
Well, I'll understand these aspects.
But when I think about Linux, especially about Fedora, I'm thinking
about the freed
On 12/08/2014 10:50 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
- Original Message -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
We don't need open or preconfigured high ports.
What we really need is a user notification with options to allow or
deny like we do with SELinux.
That would be a appropri
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Net-Amazon-S3:
652bfee36dbb2c21e8e5633961db7780 Net-Amazon-S3-0.60.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m
It's a sub-module because it's not a library.
It won't be a library in the short-term either.
- Original Message -
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 08:14:36AM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> > I can help as several months ago the budgie music player was packaged by
> > myself. At that time the
- Original Message -
> On 12/08/2014 12:51 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> This is wrong and you know about that - the firewalld folks have been
> urged to use this zone for the Workstation product - it was a
> Workstation team decision.
What?! We discussed it, and it was deemed acceptable
On 12/08/2014 03:12 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
- Original Message -
On 12/08/2014 12:51 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
This is wrong and you know about that - the firewalld folks have been
urged to use this zone for the Workstation product - it was a
Workstation team decision.
What?! We
On 8 December 2014 at 13:45, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 12:11:40PM +, Ian Malone wrote:
>> >> >>> You're free to select another firewall zone
>> And free to move to another distro of course.
>
> Well, or free to select another Fedora offering, or configure you
> systems to
- Original Message -
> On 12/08/2014 03:12 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> >> On 12/08/2014 12:51 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> >
> >> This is wrong and you know about that - the firewalld folks have been
> >> urged to use this zone for the Workstation
On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 20:01 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 04.12.2014 um 19:57 schrieb Adam Jackson:
> > I think it's a bit misguided to even think of these things as related.
> > "Polish" in an end-user-visible sense is itself a list of tasks and
> > criteria that require dedicated attention, pr
commit 4c2b55a59d34410fa3e528d1b8bd8da5be16
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Mon Dec 8 15:41:35 2014 +0100
0.05-TRIAL
.gitignore |1 +
perl-smartmatch.spec | 17 +++--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 09:08:09AM -0500, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> It's a sub-module because it's not a library.
I know it does not have a stable api. But could it be compiled
as a library?
Zbyszek
> It won't be a library in the short-term either.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-JSON-MaybeXS:
2780e19be87f56078f990a16361ed51b JSON-MaybeXS-1.003003.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
On 12/08/2014 03:45 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
- Original Message -
On 12/08/2014 03:12 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
- Original Message -
On 12/08/2014 12:51 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
This is wrong and you know about that - the firewalld folks have been
urged to use this zon
Am 08.12.2014 um 15:45 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
On 12/08/2014 12:51 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
This is wrong and you know about that - the firewalld folks have been
urged to use this zone for the Workstation product - it was a
Workstation team decision.
What?! We discussed it, and it was dee
Hi,
A perhaps naive question, but is it really necessary to have both the
"audio" and "jackuser" groups? Could these not be consolidated moving
forward?
Cheers,
Jonathan.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Con
- Original Message -
> On 12/08/2014 03:45 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> >> On 12/08/2014 03:12 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> - Original Message -
> On 12/08/2014 12:51 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> >>>
> This is wrong
You're completely right, I won't follow security experts' ideas on UI, just as
I won't follow a UX designers' ideas on security.
I was happy to act as the go between to fix a long-standing problem, only to be
told 6 month later that they accepted the
change because we gave them a choice that was
Bastien Nocera wrote:
> This was discussed, and implemented in the open, and I sent the details of
> the feature, and how it would be implemented to the fedora desktop list,
> as is customary for Workstation features.
That's the problem, you discuss everything in your private playground where
you
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 02:31:58PM +, Ian Malone wrote:
> There are three products: workstation, server, cloud. Workstation is
> the one for desktop use. That leaves server to aim for the traditional
> fedora user base, since cloud is (understandably) a very different
> thing. So if you want a
if your discussions leaded to the decisions also used the quoting style
like in that thread only contain "myself said" i guess what went wrong
in the first place
i am still unsure if that's
* intentional to mask communication
* just a bad usage of your mail-client
in any case it's not the def
Bastien Nocera wrote:
> Yeah, that's so useful. "Oh, you clicked it, it's your fault". That's not
> the type of OS I want to help implement, sorry.
So you rather implement the type of OS that just always assumes "Yes"
without even asking? Because that's what the current "firewall" rules do
(betw
On 12/08/2014 06:20 AM, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> On 12/05/2014 05:43 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> Starting the non-reponsive maintainter process for vda - Denys Vlasenko -
>> dvlas...@redhat.com as he appears to have completely abandoned busybox.
>> Anyone know him or how to contact?
>
> Hi. I'm
- Original Message -
> if your discussions leaded to the decisions also used the quoting style
> like in that thread only contain "myself said" i guess what went wrong
> in the first place
>
> i am still unsure if that's
>
> * intentional to mask communication
> * just a bad usage of you
- Original Message -
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 02:31:58PM +, Ian Malone wrote:
> > There are three products: workstation, server, cloud. Workstation is
> > the one for desktop use. That leaves server to aim for the traditional
> > fedora user base, since cloud is (understandably) a ve
Bastien Nocera wrote:
> You're free to select another firewall zone.
How, when you don't even install the firewall configuration tool by default?
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduc
- Original Message -
> Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > You're free to select another firewall zone.
>
> How, when you don't even install the firewall configuration tool by default?
Settings -> Network, select your network -> Identity -> Firewall zone
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedorap
Bastien Nocera wrote:
> Security is about compromises. The net result of the old firewall settings
> was people disabling the firewall.
And the net result of the new firewall settings is you disabling the
firewall for them, and also for all those people out there (like me) who
were NOT disabling
Am 08.12.2014 um 16:49 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
Make sure to note that I'm convinced that the new firewall settings in
Fedora Workstation 21 are more secure than what was available in Fedora 20's
default settings.
If Reindl, Kevin or Tomas want to disagree with that, I'll give you a little
exerc
- Original Message -
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 09:08:09AM -0500, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > It's a sub-module because it's not a library.
> I know it does not have a stable api. But could it be compiled
> as a library?
It could be, as long as it's not installed in a system-wide location.
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 11:01:50AM -0500, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 09:08:09AM -0500, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > > It's a sub-module because it's not a library.
> > I know it does not have a stable api. But could it be compiled
> > as a li
Am 08.12.2014 um 16:55 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
You're free to select another firewall zone.
How, when you don't even install the firewall configuration tool by default?
Settings -> Network, select your network -> Identity -> Firewall zone
that's possible with one click?
fine, then the onl
- Original Message -
> Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > Security is about compromises. The net result of the old firewall settings
> > was people disabling the firewall.
>
> And the net result of the new firewall settings is you disabling the
> firewall for them,
It's not disabled.
> and also
On Mon, 2014-12-08 at 17:08 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 08.12.2014 um 16:55 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
> >>> You're free to select another firewall zone.
> >>
> >> How, when you don't even install the firewall configuration tool by
> >> default?
> >
> > Settings -> Network, select your network -
Am 08.12.2014 um 17:10 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
Security is about compromises. The net result of the old firewall settings
was people disabling the firewall.
And the net result of the new firewall settings is you disabling the
firewall for them,
It's not disabled
it is practically
the only
Am 08.12.2014 um 17:10 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
There's a few more items that will be opened I'm afraid. And one of the reasons
why we block root ports is to avoid regressions like rpcbind listening
by default, which was due to a bug in packaging. So what you call "no firewall"
would actually hav
- Original Message -
>
> Am 08.12.2014 um 17:10 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
> >>> Security is about compromises. The net result of the old firewall
> >>> settings
> >>> was people disabling the firewall.
> >>
> >> And the net result of the new firewall settings is you disabling the
> >> fire
- Original Message -
>
> Am 08.12.2014 um 17:10 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
> > There's a few more items that will be opened I'm afraid. And one of the
> > reasons
> > why we block root ports is to avoid regressions like rpcbind listening
> > by default, which was due to a bug in packaging.
Am 08.12.2014 um 17:17 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
Am 08.12.2014 um 17:10 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
Security is about compromises. The net result of the old firewall
settings
was people disabling the firewall.
And the net result of the new firewall settings is you disabling the
firewall for them,
Am 08.12.2014 um 17:20 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
Am 08.12.2014 um 17:10 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
There's a few more items that will be opened I'm afraid. And one of the
reasons
why we block root ports is to avoid regressions like rpcbind listening
by default, which was due to a bug in packaging.
Hi all!
Fedora 21 is almost out of the doors (tomorrow!) and it's time to
take a look closer on Fedora 22 plans. But before we move on, I'd
like to ask you to help us with Fedora 21 retrospective [1]. We'd
really like to know what you think went well and what did not.
Fedora 22 starts with change
Hi,
my friend reported to me that mate-calc is deprected. We should use
galculator instead.
I've checked and found blogpost from one of mate release[0]. Please
fix up comps.xml.
Couldn't find bugzilla component for this.
[0]http://mate-desktop.org/blog/2014-03-17-galculator-is-coming-to-mate/
-
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 09:10:59AM -0700, Pete Travis wrote:
> On Dec 8, 2014 8:51 AM, "Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek"
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 04:45:12PM -0700, Pete Travis wrote:
> > > python-dateutil is old[0]. Fedora is carrying version 1.5, and upstream
> > > is up to 2.3 . If
On Mon, 2014-12-08 at 17:47 +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> fedocal and python-django-tastypie are the only packages which
> explicitly require python-dateutil < 2. If you wish, I can volunteer
> file bugs to change the dependency for F21 and rawhide for those two
> packages and do it m
I spoke with the MATE team a few weeks ago and they said that for the time
being mate-calc will remain the default.
Galculator *might* make it to the 1.10 release.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: htt
> Next time, don't be 6 month late if you're going to be flippant.
I, for one, am happy to welcome our new more-reasonable-less-paranoid
overlords. I've been disabling my firewall for ages, as my machines
are behind an enterprise firewall anyway.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.
Am 08.12.2014 um 18:33 schrieb DJ Delorie:
Next time, don't be 6 month late if you're going to be flippant.
I, for one, am happy to welcome our new more-reasonable-less-paranoid
overlords. I've been disabling my firewall for ages, as my machines
are behind an enterprise firewall anyway
that
> > I, for one, am happy to welcome our new more-reasonable-less-paranoid
> > overlords. I've been disabling my firewall for ages, as my machines
> > are behind an enterprise firewall anyway
>
> that don't apply for a notebook, especially not if the enduser is=20
> connected to a public WLAN and
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 11:03 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
> I, for one, am happy to welcome our new more-reasonable-less-paranoid
> overlords. I've been disabling my firewall for ages, as my machines
> are behind an enterprise firewall anyway.
So the target audience has shifted from developers to devel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 8 Dec 2014 02:29:17 +
Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Matthew Miller
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 11:02:28AM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> >> >For us, that would mean alternating between concentrating on
> So the target audience has shifted from developers to developers who
> don't understand ports, don't like user prompts and are behind
> enterprise firewalls.
Certainly not. I've never assumed I was an "average user". There are
many different reasons why people might want a more open firewall
On Mon, 2014-12-08 at 18:40 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> * vulnerable port open
Yeah, see, this bit right here is the actual issue. Curiously, AV
software on Other Operating Systems has had the ability to delegate this
very policy decision to the user session for at least a decade, and yet
nobo
http://paste.fedoraproject.org/157737/18064529
I had a bunch of 'sh: git: command not found' messages in a scratch
build I did from an SRPM I uploaded, testing an epel7 build before
submitting the real thing. It's been a while -- are these messages
expected behavior?
--
Paul W. Frields
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
