On Thu, 2012-04-05 at 23:34 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> John Reiser wrote:
> > Or, some packager forgot to use %{?_isa} when specifying package
> > dependencies which are [or become] architecture-dependent. This is a
> > common and systematic error which causes much grief. None of the tools
> >
On Thu, 2012-04-05 at 19:20 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
> nonamedotc gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Could someone please tell me why the install DVD for F17 is smaller than
> > that for earlier releases. The install DVD is 2.3 GB whereas the one for
> > F16, for example, is 3.5 GB. Thanks.
>
> AFAI
On 04/17/2012 11:17 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Apr 17, 2012, at 2:32 PM, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
On Tuesday, April 17, 2012, 4:15:53 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Apr 17, 2012, at 1:49 PM, Andreas Tunek wrote:
I do not see anything in the f17 feature page describing any graphical
configuration tool.
Hi Petr,
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 06:57:11AM +, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2012-04-17, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> > it seems to be the right time to do an unification/reorganization of
> > Oracle (Berkeley) DB packages in rawhide.
> [...]
> > What I'm planning to do is getting rid of db4 package. But
On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 08:02 +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 12:06 AM, Mark Haney wrote:
> > On 04/11/2012 10:34 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> You can still login at this prompt with your 'root' account and
> >> password. From that point, you can look at /var/log/Xorg.
Hi Toshio,
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 09:39:19AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > So the plan is:
> > 1) remove 4.5, 4.6 and 4.7 from compat-db
> > 2) put 4.8 to compat-db
> > 3) make db4 a dead package
> >(db4 package name is not very descriptive any more as we have
> > libdb-5.3 ...)
> >
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Net-SSH2:
27182ea5829ff896378cac15b31487a8 Net-SSH2-0.41.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/lis
commit 55252a20b3b06cae3ef2d89d1a60e3c331c46118
Author: Petr Šabata
Date: Thu Apr 19 13:03:10 2012 +0200
0.41 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Net-SSH2.spec |7 +--
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.
On Sat, 2012-04-14 at 17:07 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 00:04:05 +0100
> Richard Hughes wrote:
>
> > On 14 April 2012 22:31, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> > > What about using a page on https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ ?
> >
> > Unless I'm mistaken, you can't have more than one perso
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Mark Bidewell wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 18 Apr 2012, Mark Bidewell wrote:
>>
>> However, no GUI for installation is less than userfriendly
>>>
>>
>> did you give the VM 768MB or more RAM?
>>
>> It might not real
> Today I've followed instructions from
> http://jlaska.wordpress.com/2010/06/01/fedora-package-maintainers-want-test-results/
> is that right?
>
> I've run:
>
> autoqa-optin UpTools F-15
>
> Tell me if I'm wrong
That is correct if you want to receive rpmlint/rpmguard test output for every
new
Hi,
Dave Young is maintaining kexec-tools package in Fedora. We are fixing
quite a few bugs and adding new features too (forward porting lots of
stuff from rhel6 mkdumprd).
We are not very sure what stuff should we commit to F17 branch and what
should go on master branch for F18. What are the gu
Hi,
I found a perfect way how you can test small file issue in btrfs
because every time I tried it it breaks btrfs.
I tried on several partition with over 200+GB of free space, and after
starting openwrt compile process that creates few hundred thousand
small files I get "out of space" error.
On
perl-RPM2 has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-RPM2-1.0-2.fc17.x86_64 requires librpmio.so.2()(64bit)
perl-RPM2-1.0-2.fc17.x86_64 requires librpm.so.2()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-RPM2-1.0-2.fc17.i686 requires librpmio.so.2
perl-RPM2-1.0-2.fc17.i6
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 01:02:37PM +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> Maybe we should get rid of both compat-db and db4 and introduce libdb4
> for packages requiring this particular version if it turns out some
> app still needs libdb-4.x for functionality reasons.
>
+1
This sounds like the best cours
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 04:04:46PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> mod_python upstream has been inactive for five years, since Graham
> Dumpleton went to work on mod_wsgi. IMO it is long past time to retire
> mod_python in Fedora.
Last call. If anybody wants this package to remain in Fedora > 17,
p
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 11:40:52 +0200
Thomas Woerner wrote:
...snip...
> The man pages and more documentation will be released in a new
> package this week. firewall-config will not be finished before F-17
> GOLD.
Would it be possible to update the feature page with what is currently
working, done
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 01:50:20AM -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
> * Not really sure how to word this, but something about the website,
> wiki, and documentation? After all, it's all very x86-ish right now.
You mean making sure that an architecture is covered by the
documentation before promotion?
>
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 08:38:10AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Would it be possible to update the feature page with what is currently
> working, done, landed in F17?
>
> Everything else really needs to move to F18 at this point.
> After beta is not the time to be landing new features, heavily ch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 02 Apr 2012 20:10:12 -0700
Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> This is feedback vs the current version of the following web page:
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Secondary_Architecture_Promotion_Requirements_%28Draft%29
> > There must be adequate
There was a problem with 3.3 kernels that we fixed in 3.4, please try
Linus's most recent git tree and see if you have the same problems.
Thanks,
Josef
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 10:23 AM, valent.turko...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Hi,
> I found a perfect way how you can test small file issue in btrfs
> be
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 09:49:34AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> Release engineering find the tooling and methods of composing to be
> acceptable to be integrated into the fedora release process,
Ok, so there's no expectation that release engineering have experience
with the architecture?
> Inf
Adam Williamson wrote:
> AFAICS the real problem here is that an update got unpushed. It seems
> like Richard got the 64-bit version of libvirt -3 installed, then the -3
> update got unpushed, then something wanted to install the 32-bit version
> of libvirt. Obviously, since the update had been unp
On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 02:42 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > >>Is simulated hardware acceptable? Remote-X or VNC access? Physical
> > >>hardware? What happens when a new generation of hardware comes out?
> > >>What about architectures where there is no video at all? What about
> > >>architect
On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 13:55 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Adam Williamson said:
> > One angle on this that didn't get pointed out, I guess because anaconda
> > team apparently isn't reading, is that at least one person on the
> > anaconda team - I forget who - hates liveinst with a
On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 08:38 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 11:40:52 +0200
> Thomas Woerner wrote:
>
> ...snip...
>
> > The man pages and more documentation will be released in a new
> > package this week. firewall-config will not be finished before F-17
> > GOLD.
>
> Would it b
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Could we bung this on the agenda for the next FESCo meeting?
Already added: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/838
Mirek
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 07:29 -0400, Mark Bidewell wrote:
> The VM I used had 1GB of memory.
It's pretty much impossible for us to just guess why the installer drops
to text mode. You should be able to get X logs from the installer
environment; boot the installer, go to alt-f2, and poke around
in /
On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 17:14 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > AFAICS the real problem here is that an update got unpushed. It seems
> > like Richard got the 64-bit version of libvirt -3 installed, then the -3
> > update got unpushed, then something wanted to install the 32-bit
Anyone know what's going on with this?
A local mock build succeeds and the error doesn't look to be a problem
with my package.
From mock_output.log:
RPM needs to be updated
ERROR You need to update rpm to handle:
rpmlib(X-CheckUnifiedSystemdir) is needed by filesystem-3-2.fc17.x86_64
rpmlib(X-Che
# F17 Final Blocker Review meeting #1
# Date: 2012-04-20
# Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
Now that F17 beta has shipped, it's time to get started on reviewing
the final blockers.
The first F17 final blocker bug review meeting will be
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 14:03:35 -0500
Richard Shaw wrote:
> Anyone know what's going on with this?
>
> A local mock build succeeds and the error doesn't look to be a problem
> with my package.
>
> From mock_output.log:
> RPM needs to be updated
> ERROR You need to update rpm to handle:
> rpmlib(X-
> > However in the meantime for F17, is the installer Easter egg hunt
> > still on? It's way too obscure presently.
>
> I did some minor tweaks, posted the code here:
>
> https://github.com/kparal/InstallFedoraButton
>
> and prepared a patch for fedora-live-desktop.ks.
>
> I want to post the pa
On 04/18/2012 06:20 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
One angle on this that didn't get pointed out, I guess because
anaconda
team apparently isn't reading, is that at least one person on the
anaconda team - I forget who - hates liveinst with a passion and has
been proposing forever to kill it and replace i
On Apr 19, 2012, at 12:16 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> I think that should be seriously considered. Like Chris, I'm not
> terribly comfortable with the idea of shipping a default firewall that
> has no graphical configuration tool, and a command line one which will
> be entirely unfamiliar to p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 16:04:57 +0100
Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 09:49:34AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > Release engineering find the tooling and methods of composing to be
> > acceptable to be integrated into the fedora releas
> > I did some minor tweaks, posted the code here:
> >
> > https://github.com/kparal/InstallFedoraButton
> >
> > and prepared a patch for fedora-live-desktop.ks.
> >
> > I want to post the patch to anaconda-devel this week.
>
> What do you thing about moving the icon to the left?
This has already
On Apr 19, 2012, at 2:53 PM, Germán A. Racca wrote:
> What do you thing about moving the icon to the left?
It doesn't improve the UI, or discoverability, in my opinion. But it does
potentially conflict with the active application. The existing location seems
reasonable.
I think the name is a
On 04/19/2012 06:09 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Apr 19, 2012, at 2:53 PM, Germán A. Racca wrote:
What do you thing about moving the icon to the left?
It doesn't improve the UI, or discoverability, in my opinion. But it does
potentially conflict with the active application. The existing loca
Adam Williamson wrote:
> Um...no? The case listed *below* would be, but updates-testing doesn't
> seem particularly relevant to the above case. If updates-testing didn't
> exist at all, you'd still have the potential of this problem happening
> if updates could be unpushed.
Stable updates cannot b
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> This was a issue on the builders. Should be fixed now.
I did try once right after the first failure but I guess things
weren't fixed yet. The 2nd rebuild worked!
Thanks,
Richard
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://adm
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 4:16 AM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> No, it is not. I've said so the first time, and I have not changed my
> opinion. Make it a notification.
All this discussion is obscuring the original problem. Although a
notification is easy, if it is dismissed, it fails as a method to
st
Ok, I'll modify that section. Thanks for the feedback!
--
Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Authen-Simple:
dcca5e4d0e79d0f58212e8ece178e0b5 Authen-Simple-0.5.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma
On Apr 19, 2012, at 3:24 PM, Camilo Mesias wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 4:16 AM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>> No, it is not. I've said so the first time, and I have not changed my
>> opinion. Make it a notification.
>
> All this discussion is obscuring the original problem. Although a
> notifi
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 12:00 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> In effect it may necessitate a reboot to get that notification back, in
> order to know how to install?
>
Not if the notification is resident, in which case it will remain in the
message tray even after it has been acknowledged by the user.
On Apr 19, 2012, at 4:16 PM, Florian Müllner wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 12:00 AM, Chris Murphy
> wrote:
> In effect it may necessitate a reboot to get that notification back, in order
> to know how to install?
>
> Not if the notification is resident, in which case it will remain in
commit 4b4953aac5726417185c25a5b14c2fbef1031869
Author: Emmanuel Seyman
Date: Fri Apr 20 00:24:26 2012 +0200
Update to 0.5
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Authen-Simple.spec | 20 +---
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletio
On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 16:24 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> That is obscure UI design, and therefore doesn't resolve the current
> UI obscurity. So I see very little efficacy in the idea.
To contribute something positive here, I went ahead and implemented the
'oscurity'. See attached. As an extra w
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 07:29 -0400, Mark Bidewell wrote:
> > The VM I used had 1GB of memory.
>
> It's pretty much impossible for us to just guess why the installer drops
> to text mode. You should be able to get X logs from the installer
>
Voting for the Fedora 18 release names has begun. You can find the
potential names in the voting application:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/voting/
If you are a Fedora contributor (defined as having signed the FPCA and being
in one other Fedora group in the account system) then you are eligil
On 04/19/2012 07:04 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
This cycle, the Board is also asking contributors to let us know if we
should continue to have release names for future Fedora releases. Even
though the interface is the same, this portion is intended to be a poll
rather than a straight up vote. Th
Seems that some people unhappy with the "Beefy Miracle" are trying to
make sure that we won't ever had any nice and fluffy codename.
H.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 10:00:58PM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 04/19/2012 07:04 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> >This cycle, the Board is also asking contributors to let us know if we
> >should continue to have release names for future Fedora releases. Even
> >though the interface is the s
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 08:34:29AM +0200, Haïkel Guémar wrote:
> Seems that some people unhappy with the "Beefy Miracle" are trying to
> make sure that we won't ever had any nice and fluffy codename.
>
Actually:
* some people are just unhappy with the release names altogether.
* some people are un
55 matches
Mail list logo
