Dne 5.2.2011 19:01, Paul F. Johnson napsal(a):
> Problem 2 (laptop). Gnome is dead. I can use KDE for my desktop but
> gnome, irrespective of the user, gives me a blue stripy screen and
> that's it. I've tried creating a new user in case it was my settings,
> but nope, blue stripy screen. I am not
Dne 7.2.2011 05:12, David napsal(a):
> I switched to XFCE two months, maybe longer ago, whenever it was that
> this Gnome 3 or gnome-shell 'thing' first appeared in Rawhide. Why?
> Becasue it broke my desktop. Actually I am not exactly sure why but I
> know that I need *real* Nvidia drivers for my
On 02/14/2011 06:35 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 02/14/2011 06:18 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
>> On 02/14/2011 11:58 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> What is the procedure to push a package, which currently is causing
>>> broken deps in f15 to f15 as fast as possible?
>>>
>>> Though bodhi of
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:51:21 -0600
> Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 18:35:54 +0100,
>> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> >
>> > I was looking into fixing the 10-15 perl-packages, which have made
>> > it into current f15, even t
On 16/02/11 09:39, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
>> On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:51:21 -0600
>> Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 18:35:54 +0100,
>>>Ralf Corsepius wrote:
I was looking into fixing the 10-15 perl-packages,
BJ Dierkes wrote:
> What would be the thoughts of using that to produce more sane/traditional
> tarbals of upstream GitHub source?
It doesn't fix the third, and main, issue: GitHub-generated tarballs get a
new checksum each time they're regenerated (because some file dates change).
This makes th
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 02/12/2011 07:10 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Any chance of finishing Arista Transcoder review process? It is a
>> great app that makes transcoding a breeze so it would be great win for
>> Fedora users to have it in the repos.
On 02/16/2011 12:22 AM, BJ Dierkes wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I hope I am not the first to come across packaging issues for projects that
> use GitHub as their upstream source download. For those not familiar, GitHub
> dynamically generates downloads for all git 'tags'. So for example:
>
> $ git
Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
> I completely agree.
>
> At least nag-mails about the broken dependencies (because of rpm-4.9)
> should be delivered sooner or we should wait with branching or do
> mass-rebuild sooner. Now we have to build everything for F-{15,16} and
> even wait for testing, which is ri
commit c85af32b52a9e207e2631d77ef6ed9bab54c75e7
Author: Marcela Mašláňová
Date: Wed Feb 16 10:56:57 2011 +0100
fix filter for RPM4.9
perl-Catalyst-Controller-FormBuilder.spec | 38 ++---
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Cat
On 02/16/2011 10:55 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> On 02/16/2011 12:22 AM, BJ Dierkes wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I hope I am not the first to come across packaging issues for projects that
>> use GitHub as their upstream source download. For those not familiar,
>> GitHub dynamically generates
Hi everyone,
We will need to package sonatype-tycho[1] sooner or later for building
eclipse. I started looking into it a little bit and it seems things
would be much, much more simple if I was able to bundle current binary
release of tycho (or probably just some part of it) temporarily to build
"o
Dne 16.2.2011 02:24, Tom Lane napsal(a):
> Ken Dreyer writes:
>> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 4:22 PM, BJ Dierkes
>> wrote:
>>> I'm wondering how other people have resolved these issues for projects using
>>> GitHub as the upstream Source0 download provider.
>>> Finally, debian has a web app to resol
On 02/16/2011 10:55 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
>> I completely agree.
>>
>> At least nag-mails about the broken dependencies (because of rpm-4.9)
>> should be delivered sooner or we should wait with branching or do
>> mass-rebuild sooner. Now we have to build everything for
I ran into Github-related issues as well and filed a bug report:
http://support.github.com/discussions/repos/4565-sha-in-download-filename-does-not-match-directory
You can simply append the filename to the URL and it'll work, I'm using
this for example in
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=
On 02/16/2011 03:23 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
> I know that the ansswer is always to shift package ownership to some
> new blood, but I can't handle it. I'm weeky behind on releasing Fusion
> Linux that is my primary focus so taking any additional stuff is not
> realistic because I almos
Chris Adams writes:
> Hmm, also what does this do to PXE booting. IIRC there is a (relatively
> low) limit on the size of the initrd loaded by pxelinux.
Even if there is no limit, fetching large files over TFTP can be rather
slow. The initrd seems to be 135MB right now, which seems to be on the
On 16.02.2011 00:01, Branched Report wrote:
> Compose started at Tue Feb 15 13:15:48 UTC 2011
>
> Broken deps for x86_64
> --
> urg-0.8.7-4.fc15.i686 requires libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.44.0
> urg-0.8.7-4.fc15.x86_64 requires
>
In Fedora 15 development only, not reproducible with Fedora 14:
Could you help classifying the following backtrace?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=473671
It's related to dlopening a shared lib and crashes during initialization
of static members. ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/669889
Dne 16.2.2011 09:38, Matej Cepl napsal(a):
> Looks like a bad bug I was hit by as well. Try to comment out putting
> clock on the gnome-shell black panel on the top in
> /usr/share/gnome-shell/js/ui/panel.js (see attached patch). Does it help?
and the second time with patch actually attached.
Mat
Dne 16.2.2011 11:06, Stanislav Ochotnicky napsal(a):
>> Which basically takes the tag name and creates a nice tarball from it.
>
> Although I should pipe it through gzip/bzip2 :-/
And you really don't resolve the issue with unstable MD5 checksum.
Matěj
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedorap
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 15:14:06 +0100,
Tim Niemueller wrote:
> On 16.02.2011 00:01, Branched Report wrote:
> > Compose started at Tue Feb 15 13:15:48 UTC 2011
> >
> > Broken deps for x86_64
> > --
> > urg-0.8.7-4.fc15.i686 requires li
commit b726c4fff260faa5416910370bb7ac454e358d48
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Wed Feb 16 15:42:06 2011 +0100
Version unversioned Provides
perl-Statistics-Basic.spec |6 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Statistics-Basic.spec b/perl-Statistics-Bas
Summary of changes:
b726c4f... Version unversioned Provides (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapr
On 02/16/2011 03:36 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
> Dne 16.2.2011 11:06, Stanislav Ochotnicky napsal(a):
>>> Which basically takes the tag name and creates a nice tarball from it.
>>
>> Although I should pipe it through gzip/bzip2 :-/
>
> And you really don't resolve the issue with unstable MD5 checksum.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677799
--- Comment #7 from James Laska 2011-02-16 09:52:02 EST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> The update was pushed to stable overnight
Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> We will need to package sonatype-tycho[1] sooner or later for building
> eclipse. I started looking into it a little bit and it seems things
> would be much, much more simple if I was able to bundle current binary
> release of tycho (or probably just
On 02/16/2011 04:35 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> We will need to package sonatype-tycho[1] sooner or later for building
>> eclipse. I started looking into it a little bit and it seems things
>> would be much, much more simple if I was able to bundle c
- Original Message -
> From: "Kevin Kofler"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 10:55:26 AM
> Subject: Re: Procedure to push a package causing broken deps to f15?
> Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
> > I completely agree.
> >
> > At least nag-mails about the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677799
--- Comment #8 from Ralf Corsepius 2011-02-16 10:50:10
EST ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #6)
> > (In rep
Stanislav Ochotnicky writes:
> On 02/16/2011 03:36 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
>> Dne 16.2.2011 11:06, Stanislav Ochotnicky napsal(a):
Which basically takes the tag name and creates a nice tarball from it.
>>>
>>> Although I should pipe it through gzip/bzip2 :-/
>>
>> And you really don't resolve
- Original Message -
> From: "Paul Howarth"
> To: "Peter Robinson"
> Cc: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 10:43:18 AM
> Subject: Re: Procedure to push a package causing broken deps to f15?
> On 16/02/11 09:39, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >
- Original Message -
> From: "Ralf Corsepius"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 12:44:44 PM
> Subject: Re: Procedure to push a package causing broken deps to f15?
> On 02/16/2011 10:55 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Marcela Mašláňová
- Original Message -
> From: "Bruno Wolff III"
> To: "Ralf Corsepius"
> Cc: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
> , "Tom Callaway"
> Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 6:51:21 PM
> Subject: Re: Procedure to push a package causing broken deps to f15?
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 18:3
On 02/16/2011 04:58 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Stanislav Ochotnicky writes:
>
>> On 02/16/2011 03:36 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
>>> Dne 16.2.2011 11:06, Stanislav Ochotnicky napsal(a):
> Which basically takes the tag name and creates a nice tarball from it.
Although I should pipe it thr
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678059
--- Comment #1 from Miguel 2011-02-16 11:14:33 EST ---
Created attachment 479153
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cg
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [abrt] perl-Padre-0.64-1.fc14: Process /usr/bin/perl was killed by
signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678059
Summary: [abrt] perl-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678059
--- Comment #2 from Miguel 2011-02-16 11:22:14 EST ---
http://mail.szabgab.com/pipermail/padre-dev/2009-May/000988.html
--
Con
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Parse-CPAN-Meta:
32c8b2ba97887b526a0948706c546eba Parse-CPAN-Meta-1.4401.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-MooseX-NonMoose:
ae49a26d05ab00cc9fefd5c06149b00e MooseX-NonMoose-0.18.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.o
Hi,
I appreciate updates and hot-fixes applied to packages on new builds.
Is it possible to send an e-mail to the package maintainer before
updating the package? Or is there some reminder already in place that
does this?
Please let me know,
Thanks!
SK
--
Shakthi Kannan
http://www.shakthimaan.
On 02/16/2011 05:30 PM, Shakthi Kannan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I appreciate updates and hot-fixes applied to packages on new builds.
> Is it possible to send an e-mail to the package maintainer before
> updating the package? Or is there some reminder already in place that
> does this?
>
> Please let me
On 02/16/2011 05:07 PM, Marcela Maslanova wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Ralf Corsepius"
>> To: "Development discussions related to
>> Fedora"
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 12:44:44 PM
>> Subject: Re: Procedure to push a package causing broken deps to f15?
>> On 02/16/
On 2/15/11 4:29 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/561
>
> Recently, it was brought up to me that bugz.fp.o was showing summaries of
> bugs that are marked private. This was probably revealing too much
> information as summaries could contain harmful clues about secu
commit 8891b99465127140957810b80ea9a1ac685994b7
Author: Iain Arnell
Date: Wed Feb 16 18:18:56 2011 +0100
update to 0.18
.gitignore|1 +
perl-MooseX-NonMoose.spec |9 +++--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
> That does not mean that the compressed contents will always be the same.
> At least the gzip compressed tarballs from github contain a time stamp.
That is true of the tarball-generation feature of gitweb or whatever it's
called last I looked too. It's easily fixed by having it pass -n to gzip
(
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-02-16)
===
Meeting started by nirik at 17:30:02 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-02-16/fesco.2011-02-16-17.30.log.html
Meeting summary
-
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> In Fedora 15 development only, not reproducible with Fedora 14:
>
> Could you help classifying the following backtrace?
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=473671
>
> It's related to dlopening a shared lib and crashes during initialization
> of static members
Do we need to manually sign up for F15 AutoQA checks? It seems packages I'm
building for F15 are not getting checked.
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora
I was just trying to build the latest Asterisk, which uses
jack-audio-connection-kit, but it looks like the most recent build of
celt from this afternoon broke the build:
DEBUG util.py:247: libcelt0.so.1()(64bit) is needed by
jack-audio-connection-kit-1.9.6-4.fc16.x86_64
--
Jeff Ollie
--
devel
Sorry for the late reply, I have a filter rule for fedora-devel and
forgot to check the folder. My account name on FAS is "kurtseifried"
-Kurt
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 14:34:02 -0700
> Kurt Seifried wrote:
>
>> Hey just pinging you, do I need to
Remember, everyone tomorrow - 2011-02-17 - is Xfce Test Day! F15 will
have Xfce 4.8 and this version is in already, so we need lots of testing
to make sure it's all working fine. All the test info is on the Wiki
page - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2011-02-17_Xfce - and
we'll be in #fedor
52 matches
Mail list logo
