On 16/02/11 09:39, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Paul Howarth<p...@city-fan.org> wrote: >> On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:51:21 -0600 >> Bruno Wolff III<br...@wolff.to> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 18:35:54 +0100, >>> Ralf Corsepius<rc040...@freenet.de> wrote: >>>> >>>> I was looking into fixing the 10-15 perl-packages, which have made >>>> it into current f15, even though they carry broken deps. Waiting >>>> the usual 8-10 days of delay is not helpful for such cases, because >>>> they will cause f15 to remain broken for at minimum this delay time >>>> (Which in case of dep chains, can easily evolve to several weeks >>>> [1]). >>> >>> The policy is at http://www.fedora.redhat.com/wiki/Updates_Policy. >>> For branched (pre-beta) you only need to wait three days if you get >>> no karma and it isn't critpath. You can set the karma required to one >>> and get someone else to do a test and sign off on it and move it to >>> stable right after that. >> >> I just tried marking >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Net-SSH-Perl-1.34-11.fc15 >> as stable; it's been in testing for 3 days and 4 hours now so I >> expected it to work but was told by bodhi that it hadn't been in >> testing for the required period yet. Does bodhi know that the pre-beta >> testing period is a minimum of 3 days rather than 7? > > Its the date that its pushed to testing not the date its submitted.
I know. It was pushed to testing on 2011-02-13 at 03:23:21 and I tried to mark it stable on 2011-02-16 at 07:40:00 (+3 days and 4 hours). > Looking at it now it has a message that it can be pushed to stable. That's because Ralf has since tested it and given it karma to make it to the stable threshold (thanks Ralf). Paul. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
