Re: applied, non-theoretical use of systemd

2010-08-27 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 08/27/2010 10:44 AM, Petrus de Calguarium wrote: > 1. I noticed that one can no longer (with v8-2) turn off the computer by > clicking the > 'turn off computer' button in KDE. I figured out, with help of recent > threads, that one > has to run: systemctl isolate poweroff.target. It worked.

Re: applied, non-theoretical use of systemd

2010-08-27 Thread Martin Sourada
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 12:41 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 08/27/2010 10:44 AM, Petrus de Calguarium wrote: > > 1. I noticed that one can no longer (with v8-2) turn off the computer by > > clicking the > > 'turn off computer' button in KDE. I figured out, with help of recent > > threads, tha

Re: Search Engine Proposal

2010-08-27 Thread Thomas Janssen
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 3:43 AM, Manuel Escudero wrote: > > Hi! I've been working in a project called "Hermes" (For more information > refer to: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Hermes) The idea is to build a Feed > Parser > customizable by the user that notifies when there are important news... As

Re: Review swaps

2010-08-27 Thread Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
26.08.2010 18:34, Chen Lei пишет: > I've have several review requests that have been sitting around for a while > now. Many of them are new dependencies for existing packages in > fedora, anyone want to swap? > > EmfEngine(new dep for qtiplot 0.9.8.1): > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_

Question about sane usage of macroses in perl template

2010-08-27 Thread Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
$ rpmdev-newspec -t perl produce template where, inter alia we have such lines: %{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor OPTIMIZE="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" make %{?_smp_mflags}

Re: Question about sane usage of macroses in perl template

2010-08-27 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2010-08-27, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote: > > %{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor > OPTIMIZE="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" > > make %{?_smp_mflags} > > I'm wonder why there used mix of macros %{__perl} and plain other > commands like make? Because you cannot have macro for each shell comma

Re: systemd and cgroups: heads up

2010-08-27 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 02:44:15PM -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 08/26/2010 01:18 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 01:04:33PM -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > >> > >> I don't know. My goal with sandbox was to allow use

Re: New fedpkg build coming to an update repo near you!

2010-08-27 Thread Mattias Ellert
tor 2010-08-26 klockan 13:27 -0700 skrev Jesse Keating: > > "Matej Cepl" wrote: > > >Jesse Keating, Mon, 23 Aug 2010 23:44:34 -0700: > >> I just submitted updates for el5 and f1{2,3,4} as well as a build for > >> rawhide (f15) of a new fedpkg build. Here is a summary from the rpm: > > > >EL6? >

Re: Question about sane usage of macroses in perl template

2010-08-27 Thread Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
27.08.2010 13:08, Petr Pisar ?: > On 2010-08-27, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) > wrote: >> %{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor >> OPTIMIZE="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" >> >> make %{?_smp_mflags} >> >> I'm wonder why there used mix of macros %{__perl} and plain other >> commands like make? > Be

Re: systemd and changes

2010-08-27 Thread Thomas Moschny
2010/8/27 Jesse Keating : > That's strange.  I use it on my laptop, which has a caching local DNS > server (dnsmasq) and it works just fine.  I do have a script in > /etc/NetworkManager/dispatcher.d/ that waits for bringup and vpn bring > up to make adjustments to the running local DNS server (whic

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-27 Thread Matej Cepl
Kevin Kofler, Thu, 26 Aug 2010 19:59:00 +0200: > 1. Not everyone uses GNOME. I believe KDE should have something equivalent ... don't you have a tool for managing multiple screens/heads? > 3. What if you can't bring up X in the first place? Somebody suggested Xorg -configure but the main point

Re: Question about sane usage of macroses in perl template

2010-08-27 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 08/27/2010 10:28 AM, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote: > $ rpmdev-newspec -t perl > produce template where, inter alia we have such lines: > %{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor > OPTIMIZE="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" > > make %{?_smp_mflags} > > I'm wonder why there used mix of macros %{__per

Re: drop default MTA for Fedora 15

2010-08-27 Thread David Woodhouse
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 18:09 -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > What more do you want an MTA to do at install? It was decided a long > time ago that the MTA shouldn't listen for remote SMTP connections by > default. Pretty much any other thing I can think of (such as > delivering root mail to a non-root

Re: Question about sane usage of macroses in perl template

2010-08-27 Thread Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
27.08.2010 13:58, Ralf Corsepius пишет: > On 08/27/2010 10:28 AM, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote: >> $ rpmdev-newspec -t perl >> produce template where, inter alia we have such lines: >> %{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor >> OPTIMIZE="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" >> >> make %{?_smp_mflags} >>

Re: Fedora Notifications System.

2010-08-27 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
On Thursday, August 26, 2010 08:17:14 pm Mahmoud Abdul Jawad wrote: > On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 06:30 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > > > I have to agree with Kevin here (!). Employing a notification system in > > parallel to the ones already

Re: systemd and changes

2010-08-27 Thread Till Maas
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 11:43:41AM +0200, Thomas Moschny wrote: > 2010/8/27 Jesse Keating : > > That's strange.  I use it on my laptop, which has a caching local DNS > > server (dnsmasq) and it works just fine.  I do have a script in > > /etc/NetworkManager/dispatcher.d/ that waits for bringup and

Re: Orphaning slim

2010-08-27 Thread Petr Sabata
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 07:09:30PM +0200, Lorenzo Villani wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > On 08/26/2010 03:29 PM, Petr Sabata wrote: > > > >> Looks like something I've been looking for ;) > >> Taken. (F14 & rawhide) > > I can release ownership on F-12 and F-13 too,

rawhide report: 20100827 changes

2010-08-27 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Fri Aug 27 08:15:37 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnarl-4.4.so PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnat-4.4.so PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.x86_64 req

Re: drop default MTA for Fedora 15

2010-08-27 Thread Ben Boeckel
Chris Adams wrote: > sendmail has always worked out of the box for some things, including > sending mail from local programs to remote email addresses I thought this was a speed trip to spamhaus' lists (the `localhost' part I've found). I had to get my machine off of it when I failed to setup KMa

Re: fedora mission (was Re: systemd and changes)

2010-08-27 Thread Matthew Miller
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:03:06AM -0500, Garrett Holmstrom wrote: > At the time the install images are composed the release's EOL date has > not yet been decided, so we would be stuck with guessing a date and > hoping it will be somewhat close. Give it a year, and it's still better than the cur

Re: systemd v8 for rawhide?

2010-08-27 Thread Matthew Miller
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 05:39:10PM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > As Notting pointed out, not everything that goes into -testing makes it > into stable, and even then some would say waiting for -testing is too > late, and things in dist-f14-updates-candidate (eg the fresh builds) > should go into ra

Re: systemd and cgroups: heads up

2010-08-27 Thread Daniel J Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/27/2010 05:22 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 02:44:15PM -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 08/26/2010 01:18 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >>> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at

Re: systemd v8 for rawhide?

2010-08-27 Thread Bill Nottingham
Matthew Miller (mat...@mattdm.org) said: > I'm willing to sacrifice my stable rawhide desktop system in the name of > getting Fedora more testing. Where should this discussion be had? FESCo. rel-eng will implement it (it's a one-line koji command), but the decision isn't really rel-eng's to make

Re: applied, non-theoretical use of systemd

2010-08-27 Thread Bill Nottingham
Petrus de Calguarium (kwhisk...@gmail.com) said: > 1. I noticed that one can no longer (with v8-2) turn off the computer by > clicking the > 'turn off computer' button in KDE. I figured out, with help of recent > threads, that one > has to run: systemctl isolate poweroff.target. It worked. Is

Re: drop default MTA for Fedora 15

2010-08-27 Thread Bill Nottingham
Chris Adams (cmad...@hiwaay.net) said: > Once upon a time, Garrett Holmstrom said: > > While it may be debatable what benefit one might get from removing it > > from the default install, can we at least remove MTAs from @core to help > > make things easier for appliance folks? One can still go

Re: systemd v8 for rawhide?

2010-08-27 Thread Jesse Keating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/27/2010 08:17 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Matthew Miller (mat...@mattdm.org) said: >> I'm willing to sacrifice my stable rawhide desktop system in the name of >> getting Fedora more testing. Where should this discussion be had? > > FESCo. rel-

Re: applied, non-theoretical use of systemd

2010-08-27 Thread Petrus de Calguarium
Matthew Miller wrote: > > What do the logs say? > Where are the logs? I looked in /var/log/ last night and there is no system.log or systemd.log file on my system. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: systemd and changes

2010-08-27 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Chuck Anderson said: > NM can use old style /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-*. Can't > you just write those out from your %post section? Or, if you want all > the NM features like WPA wireless config, you can use the keyfile > plugin to write NM ini-style key-value file

Re: applied, non-theoretical use of systemd

2010-08-27 Thread Petrus de Calguarium
Thanks Rahul and Martin (other posts in this thread) :) Bill Nottingham wrote: > Petrus de Calguarium said: >> 1. I noticed that one can no longer (with v8-2) turn off the computer by >> clicking the 'turn off computer' button in KDE. I figured out, with help >> of recent threads, that one has to

F-14 Branched report: 20100827 changes

2010-08-27 Thread Branched Report
Compose started at Fri Aug 27 13:15:19 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnarl-4.4.so PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnat-4.4.so PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.x86_64 req

Re: systemd and changes

2010-08-27 Thread Chuck Anderson
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 09:12:28PM +0100, Mark Chappell wrote: > On 26/08/2010, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > > Just to be clear.. its the clickity nature of the initial system wide > > configuration that is the barrier for you? if you had a reasonable > > non-clickity way to add a system wide on-boot act

Re: systemd v8 for rawhide?

2010-08-27 Thread Matthew Miller
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 11:17:37AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > FESCo. rel-eng will implement it (it's a one-line koji command), but the > decision isn't really rel-eng's to make unilaterally. > https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/452 Ahsome. -- Matthew Miller Senior Systems Architect -- I

Re: drop default MTA for Fedora 15

2010-08-27 Thread Arthur Pemberton
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 6:04 AM, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 18:09 -0500, Chris Adams wrote: >> What more do you want an MTA to do at install?  It was decided a long >> time ago that the MTA shouldn't listen for remote SMTP connections by >> default.  Pretty much any other thing

Re: drop default MTA for Fedora 15

2010-08-27 Thread Arthur Pemberton
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 8:04 AM, Ben Boeckel wrote: > Chris Adams wrote: >> sendmail has always worked out of the box for some things, including >> sending mail from local programs to remote email addresses > > I thought this was a speed trip to spamhaus' lists (the `localhost' > part I've found)

Re: applied, non-theoretical use of systemd

2010-08-27 Thread Matthew Miller
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 11:47:14AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > OK, I just updated to v8-3 and have the latest initscripts, too. I tried > > to shut down twice (I invoked sudo systemctl daemon-reexec before the > > second time), and I still cannot power down by clicking on the power off > > but

Re: applied, non-theoretical use of systemd

2010-08-27 Thread Petrus de Calguarium
Petrus de Calguarium wrote: Forget the BS about dnsmasq not cacheing! I forgot to change /etc/resolv.conf and was still using the old one that uses the default nameservers. So, the problem reduces to the Shut Off Computer button in KDE not working. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedorapro

Re: applied, non-theoretical use of systemd

2010-08-27 Thread Bill Nottingham
Petrus de Calguarium (kwhisk...@gmail.com) said: > So, the problem reduces to the Shut Off Computer button in KDE not working. OK. So the question is ... what does this button do? Invoke 'halt'? Invoke 'shutdown -h now'? Invoke ConsoleKit's Stop() method? Bill -- devel mailing list devel@lists.

Re: systemd v8 for rawhide?

2010-08-27 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 09:10:35 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > - -updates. A potential way to fix this is to have bodhi not /move/ the > build from dist-f14-updates-candidate into -testing or -updates, but > instead just add -testing or -updates as a secondary tag to the build. > This should en

Re: applied, non-theoretical use of systemd

2010-08-27 Thread Petrus de Calguarium
Matthew Miller wrote: > And what do the shutdown and poweroff commands do? > OK, I'm back. I ran shutdown (forgot to add -h now), so it took a bit, from within konsole. It shut off the system, without running plymouth. To speed things up, I appended 3 (Lennard wrote that you can still to this

Re: applied, non-theoretical use of systemd

2010-08-27 Thread Petrus de Calguarium
Petrus de Calguarium wrote: > dnsmasq does not appear to be working correctly. This is odd. systemctl and systemctl status dnsmasq.service both show dnsmasq as active (running), but it is not cacheing. Could it be that it's not reading /etc/dnsmasq.conf? No, I don't think so (Privoxy does app

Re: applied, non-theoretical use of systemd

2010-08-27 Thread Matthew Miller
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 09:42:49AM -0600, Petrus de Calguarium wrote: > OK, I just updated to v8-3 and have the latest initscripts, too. I tried > to shut down twice (I invoked sudo systemctl daemon-reexec before the > second time), and I still cannot power down by clicking on the power off > butto

Re: New fedpkg build coming to an update repo near you!

2010-08-27 Thread Jesse Keating
"Mattias Ellert" wrote: >tor 2010-08-26 klockan 13:27 -0700 skrev Jesse Keating: >> >> "Matej Cepl" wrote: >> >> >Jesse Keating, Mon, 23 Aug 2010 23:44:34 -0700: >> >> I just submitted updates for el5 and f1{2,3,4} as well as a build for >> >> rawhide (f15) of a new fedpkg build. Here is a

Fedora 14 Beta Blocker Bug Review Meeting #1 - recap

2010-08-27 Thread James Laska
#fedora-bugzappers: F-14-Beta blocker review Meeting started by jlaska at 16:00:10 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2010-08-27/f-14-beta-blocker-review.2

Re: systemd v8 for rawhide?

2010-08-27 Thread Matthew Miller
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 09:10:35AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > I'll copy this to the ticket as well, but there are some non-trivial > roadblocks to this. Thanks for putting thought into it. I don't think it's at all urgent, but it my exposure to packages which need testing. -- Matthew Miller

Re: applied, non-theoretical use of systemd

2010-08-27 Thread Matthew Miller
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 09:56:15AM -0600, Petrus de Calguarium wrote: > > What do the logs say? > Where are the logs? I looked in /var/log/ last night and there is no > system.log or > systemd.log file on my system. It doesn't log separately -- it uses syslog. So look in the /var/log/messages f

Re: applied, non-theoretical use of systemd

2010-08-27 Thread Matthew Miller
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 10:11:17AM -0600, Petrus de Calguarium wrote: > To speed things up, I appended 3 (Lennard wrote that you can still to this) > to the > kernel boot line in grub and ran poweroff. The system ran plymouth and > powered off. Wait, it fired up the graphical thing in order to

Re: applied, non-theoretical use of systemd

2010-08-27 Thread Petrus de Calguarium
Bill Nottingham wrote: > OK. So the question is ... what does this button do? Invoke 'halt'? > Invoke 'shutdown -h now'? Invoke ConsoleKit's Stop() method? > Do I need to look in the logs for this? :-) I think this is a question for the KDE guys, non? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedorap

Re: applied, non-theoretical use of systemd

2010-08-27 Thread Petrus de Calguarium
Matthew Miller wrote: > It doesn't log separately -- it uses syslog. So look in the > /var/log/messages file. > You know, I'm getting the hang of systemd. I like. I hope we're not going back to sysv, despite the grumbling. I just converted my scripts and this is easier, I think. -- devel mail

Re: systemd and changes

2010-08-27 Thread Mark Chappell
On 27/08/2010, Chuck Anderson wrote: > NM can use old style /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-*. Can't > you just write those out from your %post section? Those would be the old school files I was referring to, I hadn't found the NH-rh plugin, but as long as the RH network init script exists

Re: systemd and changes

2010-08-27 Thread Mark Chappell
On 27/08/2010, Mark Chappell wrote: > On 27/08/2010, Chuck Anderson wrote: >> NM can use old style /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-*. Can't >> you just write those out from your %post section? > > Those would be the old school files I was referring to, I hadn't found > the NH-rh plugin, but

[Bug 628046] New: Needs to BR version.pm for EPEL build

2010-08-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Needs to BR version.pm for EPEL build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628046 Summary: Needs to BR version.pm for EPEL build Product: Fedo

Re: drop default MTA for Fedora 15

2010-08-27 Thread Björn Sund
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 17:06 -0400, seth vidal wrote: > On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 16:47 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:15:12PM -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > > >> It would be good to define such a nonstandard abbrev

Re: systemd and changes

2010-08-27 Thread Till Maas
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 06:56:33PM +0100, Mark Chappell wrote: > I should point out that if NM gained a CLI so that I could do > something like that then I wouldn't mind the old RH scripts going > away, all I want is *a* method that I can automate easily, NM > currently only has a bit of a hack to

Re: Fedora Notifications System.

2010-08-27 Thread Mahmoud Abdul Jawad
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 3:07 AM, Ben Boeckel wrote: > > Don't they share a D-Bus API these days? > they do. On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > > Why? Just use system dbus notifications and you're done. But as I suggested - > it > should be used only for critical notifi

Re: systemd and changes

2010-08-27 Thread Mark Chappell
On 27/08/2010, Till Maas wrote: > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 06:56:33PM +0100, Mark Chappell wrote: > >> I should point out that if NM gained a CLI so that I could do >> something like that then I wouldn't mind the old RH scripts going >> away, all I want is *a* method that I can automate easily, NM

Re: systemd and changes

2010-08-27 Thread Tom "spot" Callaway
On 08/27/2010 02:22 PM, Mark Chappell wrote: > On 27/08/2010, Till Maas wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 06:56:33PM +0100, Mark Chappell wrote: >> >>> I should point out that if NM gained a CLI so that I could do >>> something like that then I wouldn't mind the old RH scripts going >>> away, all

Re: systemd and changes

2010-08-27 Thread Mark Chappell
On 27/08/2010, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > On 08/27/2010 02:22 PM, Mark Chappell wrote: >> Indeed, which would be useless for my use case. I may of course be >> the only one doing such things, but I suspect that at the very least >> Jon may be too... > > I assume nmcli doesn't meet the requireme

Re: drop default MTA for Fedora 15

2010-08-27 Thread seth vidal
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 20:07 +0200, Björn Sund wrote: > repoquery --whatprovides MDA > repoquery --whatprovides MUA Honestly, I think things like that would be better off as pkgtags on the pkgs in the pkgdb! -sv -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.or

Re: systemd and changes

2010-08-27 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 07:30:11PM +0100, Mark Chappell wrote: > On 27/08/2010, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > > On 08/27/2010 02:22 PM, Mark Chappell wrote: > >> Indeed, which would be useless for my use case. I may of course be > >> the only one doing such things, but I suspect that at the very l

Re: systemd and changes

2010-08-27 Thread Mark Chappell
On 27/08/2010, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > NM doesn't (yet?) support: > - bridges: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558982 > - vlans: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492377 That would explain why I couldn't figure out how to do it :) > Nb. there is following feature: > http://

Orphan packages retired for F-14 (and rawhide)

2010-08-27 Thread Bill Nottingham
In accordance with the normal process, the following packages have been orphaned for Fedora 14 and rawhide. JSDoc bzr-gtk cdf crun django-authopenid drpython fedora-security-guide-en-US fet fish gg2 gnomecatalog gperiodic impressive kasablanca kflickr lazygal libmspack mapbender mediawiki-HNP medi

cvsps ownership released

2010-08-27 Thread Ville Skyttä
Hello, I have no regular need to use cvsps any more, so I've released its ownership in pkgdb for the branches where I was the primary owner. There are co- maintainers for it, but they did not respond to my mail about whether they'd like to pick it up earlier this week, so I'm posting here in ca

Re: systemd and changes

2010-08-27 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Tom spot Callaway said: > I assume nmcli doesn't meet the requirements? nmcli manages connections (up/down), but AFAIK doesn't support configuring them or creating new connections. I didn't find a CLI tool for creating/configuring NM connections other than the universal "vi" (b

Re: systemd and changes

2010-08-27 Thread Benny Amorsen
Al Dunsmuir writes: > Let's not forget that NM is not suitable for someone running a local > DNS server (bind with DNSSEC enabled). It also does not work at all > when used on a laptop as a caching DNS. Doesn't NetworkManager respect PEERDNS=no? As I understand it, it does read ifcfg-whatev

Re: systemd and changes

2010-08-27 Thread Jesse Keating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/27/2010 02:43 AM, Thomas Moschny wrote: > 2010/8/27 Jesse Keating : >> That's strange. I use it on my laptop, which has a caching local DNS >> server (dnsmasq) and it works just fine. I do have a script in >> /etc/NetworkManager/dispatcher.d/ t

Re: fedora mission (was Re: systemd and changes)

2010-08-27 Thread Jon Masters
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 19:51 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Paul W. Frields wrote: > > My hunch is that a couple thousand a week are probably due to cable > > modems or laptops moving to addresses we simply haven't seen before. > > That's about how many new IPs appear for Fedora 7 or Rawhide each > >

Re: fedora mission (was Re: systemd and changes)

2010-08-27 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 16:37 -0400, Jon Masters wrote: > > Ah yes, attack the symptom and not the disease. Yay. Let me let you in > on a secret. Most people (and by which I mean, those not on this list) > generally don't like re-installing or upgrading their computer every 6 > months. People insta

Re: fedora mission (was Re: systemd and changes)

2010-08-27 Thread Jon Masters
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 17:54 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 16:37 -0400, Jon Masters wrote: > > > > > Ah yes, attack the symptom and not the disease. Yay. Let me let you in > > on a secret. Most people (and by which I mean, those not on this list) > > generally don't like re

Re: fedora mission (was Re: systemd and changes)

2010-08-27 Thread Jeff Spaleta
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Jon Masters wrote: > Again, I feel it is necessary to have a survey of Fedora users. > Preferably annually. And listen to the feedback. If they say "yep, we > just love the churn, the number of updates" and so forth, then fine. If > they say "actually we'd like les

Re: fedora mission (was Re: systemd and changes)

2010-08-27 Thread Jesse Keating
"Jon Masters" wrote: >On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 17:54 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: >> On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 16:37 -0400, Jon Masters wrote: >> >> > >> > Ah yes, attack the symptom and not the disease. Yay. Let me let you in >> > on a secret. Most people (and by which I mean, those not on this li

Re: fedora mission (was Re: systemd and changes)

2010-08-27 Thread Jon Masters
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 15:23 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > >Again, I feel it is necessary to have a survey of Fedora users. > >Preferably annually. And listen to the feedback. If they say "yep, we > >just love the churn, the number of updates" and so forth, then fine. If > >they say "actually we'd

Re: fedora mission (was Re: systemd and changes)

2010-08-27 Thread Bob Arendt
On 08/27/10 15:19, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Jon Masters wrote: >> Again, I feel it is necessary to have a survey of Fedora users. >> Preferably annually. And listen to the feedback. If they say "yep, we >> just love the churn, the number of updates" and so forth, then

Re: fedora mission (was Re: systemd and changes)

2010-08-27 Thread Jon Masters
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 15:47 -0700, Bob Arendt wrote: > I think it would be much better for Fedora to decide what it *should* be, > specifically what the Fedora userspace should be, and excel at that. > Don't follow the "market" or worry about being the most popular distro > (unless that's really a

Re: fedora mission (was Re: systemd and changes)

2010-08-27 Thread Jon Masters
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 18:39 -0400, Jon Masters wrote: > On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 15:23 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > > > >Again, I feel it is necessary to have a survey of Fedora users. > > >Preferably annually. And listen to the feedback. If they say "yep, we > > >just love the churn, the number of

Re: fedora mission (was Re: systemd and changes)

2010-08-27 Thread Jesse Keating
"Jon Masters" wrote: >On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 15:47 -0700, Bob Arendt wrote: > >> I think it would be much better for Fedora to decide what it *should* be, >> specifically what the Fedora userspace should be, and excel at that. >> Don't follow the "market" or worry about being the most popular di

Re: fedora mission (was Re: systemd and changes)

2010-08-27 Thread Mike McGrath
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010, Jon Masters wrote: > On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 15:23 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > > > >Again, I feel it is necessary to have a survey of Fedora users. > > >Preferably annually. And listen to the feedback. If they say "yep, we > > >just love the churn, the number of updates" and s

Re: applied, non-theoretical use of systemd

2010-08-27 Thread Brendan Jones - I.T.
On 08/27/2010 10:11 AM, Petrus de Calguarium wrote: > Where are the logs for systemd? In /var/log/messages, maybe? I add systemd.log_target=kmsg systemd.log_level=debug as kernel parameters to flesh out logging in /var/log/messages Brendan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ht

Re: fedora mission (was Re: systemd and changes)

2010-08-27 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 18:52:30 -0400 Jon Masters wrote: > On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 18:39 -0400, Jon Masters wrote: > > On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 15:23 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > > > > > >Again, I feel it is necessary to have a survey of Fedora users. > > > >Preferably annually. And listen to the feedb

Re: fedora mission (was Re: systemd and changes)

2010-08-27 Thread Jon Masters
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 18:00 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: > On Fri, 27 Aug 2010, Jon Masters wrote: > > But I feel it is "design by committee" now, just the Open Source > > version. A small group of people (f-d-l and similar) arbitrarily decide > > what the userbase "wants" without asking them, and b

Re: fedora mission (was Re: systemd and changes)

2010-08-27 Thread Pete Zaitcev
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 17:54:37 -0400 Matthias Clasen wrote: > Your attack is misguided, Jon. It is very much our responsibility to > inform users that the software they install or use is no longer actively > supported. Inform, sure. But Kevin proposed an installer that would "just refuse to instal

Re: fedora mission (was Re: systemd and changes)

2010-08-27 Thread Jon Masters
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 17:00 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 18:52:30 -0400 > Jon Masters wrote: > > > So I'm filing another FESCo ticket as I type this. They can decide > > > to reject my proposal again, in which case I will bring it up with > > > the Fedora Board by way of appeal

Re: fedora mission (was Re: systemd and changes)

2010-08-27 Thread Jeff Spaleta
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Bob Arendt wrote: > Actually I think Fedora *should* articulate who the users are, basically > design and express who and what Fedora is designed for. > I think it would be much better for Fedora to decide what it *should* be, > specifically what the Fedora usersp

Re: applied, non-theoretical use of systemd

2010-08-27 Thread Petrus de Calguarium
Brendan Jones - I.T. wrote: > On 08/27/2010 10:11 AM, Petrus de Calguarium wrote: >> Where are the logs for systemd? In /var/log/messages, maybe? > I add systemd.log_target=kmsg systemd.log_level=debug as kernel > parameters to flesh out logging in /var/log/messages > Thanks. I think it is not

Re: fedora mission (was Re: systemd and changes)

2010-08-27 Thread Bob Arendt
On 08/27/10 16:09, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Bob Arendt wrote: >> Actually I think Fedora *should* articulate who the users are, basically >> design and express who and what Fedora is designed for. > >> I think it would be much better for Fedora to decide what it *sho

Re: fedora mission (was Re: systemd and changes)

2010-08-27 Thread James Hubbard
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Bob Arendt wrote: > On 08/27/10 16:09, Jeff Spaleta wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Bob Arendt  wrote: >>> Actually I think Fedora *should* articulate who the users are, basically >>> design and express who and what Fedora is designed for. >> >>> I thin

Re: Orphan packages retired for F-14 (and rawhide)

2010-08-27 Thread Garrett Holmstrom
On 8/27/2010 2:03 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > In accordance with the normal process, the following packages have been > orphaned for Fedora 14 and rawhide. Will packages with untouched FTBFS bugs also be removed like the normal process dictates? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FTBFS#.28Proposed.2

Re: fedora mission (was Re: systemd and changes)

2010-08-27 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 15:47 -0700, Bob Arendt wrote: > On 08/27/10 15:19, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Jon Masters > > wrote: > >> Again, I feel it is necessary to have a survey of Fedora users. > >> Preferably annually. And listen to the feedback. If they say "yep, we