2010/7/1, Chitlesh GOORAH :
> Hello there,
>
> I would appreciate if someone else who is NEITHER a co-maintainer NOR
> FESCo member don't version bump my packages, without notifying me.
>
> Petr Pisar seems to mess with my packages.
>
> It's simply disgusting !!
>
> Chitlesh !
It's seems to me tha
On 07/02/2010 12:57 PM, Josephine Tannhäuser wrote:
> It's seems to me that you have to be an employee of red hat to get the
> privilegue to deal arbitrarily with all packages.
Incorrect. Anyone in the provenpackagers group has access to almost all
packages. The one exception being Mozilla. Th
On 07/02/2010 09:37 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 07/02/2010 12:57 PM, Josephine Tannhäuser wrote:
>> It's seems to me that you have to be an employee of red hat to get the
>> privilegue to deal arbitrarily with all packages.
>
> Incorrect. Anyone in the provenpackagers group has access to almo
2010/7/2 Chitlesh GOORAH :
> Hello there,
>
> I would appreciate if someone else who is NEITHER a co-maintainer NOR
> FESCo member don't version bump my packages, without notifying me.
>
It looks like Petr Pisar just fixed some FTBTS bugs in rawhide after
mass-rebuiding of all perl-related package
On 07/02/2010 01:23 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> The Petr's are apparent newbies/newcomers.
>
> They were granted access to all perl-packages, because they are @RH.
> Probably because it is their paid job to work on these packages.
I am not aware of the specifics here. Fedora's sponsorship model
On 2010/07/01 10:46 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 16:44 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>> Nathanael Noblet wrote:
>>> I presume a fedora account with certs are required for this?
>>
>> Yes, but for your karma to have any merit, you need a Fedora account.
>> Non-Fedora accoun
On 07/02/2010 10:05 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 07/02/2010 01:23 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> The Petr's are apparent newbies/newcomers.
>>
>> They were granted access to all perl-packages, because they are @RH.
>> Probably because it is their paid job to work on these packages.
>
> I am not a
Chitlesh GOORAH wrote, at 07/02/2010 04:09 AM +9:00:
> Hello there,
>
> I would appreciate if someone else who is NEITHER a co-maintainer NOR
> FESCo member don't version bump my packages, without notifying me.
>
> Petr Pisar seems to mess with my packages.
>
> It's simply disgusting !!
>
> Chitles
On 07/02/2010 11:35 AM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
> Chitlesh GOORAH wrote, at 07/02/2010 04:09 AM +9:00:
>> Hello there,
>>
>> I would appreciate if someone else who is NEITHER a co-maintainer NOR
>> FESCo member don't version bump my packages, without notifying me.
>>
>> Petr Pisar seems to mess with m
Kalev Lember wrote, at 07/02/2010 05:51 PM +9:00:
> On 07/02/2010 11:35 AM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
>> Chitlesh GOORAH wrote, at 07/02/2010 04:09 AM +9:00:
>>> Hello there,
>>>
>>> I would appreciate if someone else who is NEITHER a co-maintainer NOR
>>> FESCo member don't version bump my packages, wi
On 07/02/2010 01:56 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>
> That said, I can't avoid having to agree to Josephine. The Petr's hardly
> would have been granted this amount of CVS access if they had not been @RH.
It seems Chitlesh was wrong and the person doing the commit was
different. You seem to be co
Dne 2.7.2010 09:37, Rahul Sundaram napsal(a):
> On 07/02/2010 12:57 PM, Josephine Tannhäuser wrote:
>> It's seems to me that you have to be an employee of red hat to get the
>> privilegue to deal arbitrarily with all packages.
>
> Incorrect. Anyone in the provenpackagers group has access to almo
Matěj Cepl wrote:
> b) if you don't like provenpackagers to mess with your packages, go and
> make a switch in pkgdb.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Provenpackager_policy
To exclude a package from provenpackagers access, you have to open a
ticket at FESCo issue tracker and explain why provenpack
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 13:07:45 +0530, Rahul wrote:
> IMO, there is absolutely nothing wrong with anyone
> with commit access updating packages in Rawhide
Of course there is. There ought to be prior communication about such plans
to upgrade a package. The primary package maintainer may have good r
Dne 2.7.2010 06:28, Adam Miller napsal(a):
> I don't think it really matters what we call it, I just think that
> package maintainers are starting to get a sense of entitlement and I
> feel that's counter productive to the open environment we're used to
> and are trying to help continue to grow.
I
Dne 2.7.2010 11:34, Michael Schwendt napsal(a):
> Of course there is. There ought to be prior communication about such plans
> to upgrade a package. The primary package maintainer may have good reasons
> for not upgrading the package. Just ask!
The primary package maintainer (see the other thread
David Woodhouse píše v Pá 02. 07. 2010 v 07:08 +0100:
> On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 21:09 +0200, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
> >
> > I would appreciate if someone else who is NEITHER a co-maintainer NOR
> > FESCo member don't version bump my packages, without notifying me.
> >
> > Petr Pisar seems to mess
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 10:33:52 +0100, Mark wrote:
> ProvenPackagers are there precisely to do what it looks like happened
> with : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=8618
Wait a minute, it's not that easy. Provenpackagers are not supposed to
jump in every N months, apply a fix
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 11:40:11 +0200, Matěj wrote:
> Dne 2.7.2010 11:34, Michael Schwendt napsal(a):
> > Of course there is. There ought to be prior communication about such plans
> > to upgrade a package. The primary package maintainer may have good reasons
> > for not upgrading the package. Just
Excerpts from Michael Schwendt's message of Fri Jul 02 11:34:38 +0200 2010:
> On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 13:07:45 +0530, Rahul wrote:
>
> > IMO, there is absolutely nothing wrong with anyone
> > with commit access updating packages in Rawhide
>
> Of course there is. There ought to be prior communicati
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 11:40:11AM +0200, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> Dne 2.7.2010 11:34, Michael Schwendt napsal(a):
> > Of course there is. There ought to be prior communication about such plans
> > to upgrade a package. The primary package maintainer may have good reasons
> > for not upgrading the packa
2010/7/2 Patrice Dumas :
> On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 11:40:11AM +0200, Matěj Cepl wrote:
>> Dne 2.7.2010 11:34, Michael Schwendt napsal(a):
>> > Of course there is. There ought to be prior communication about such plans
>> > to upgrade a package. The primary package maintainer may have good reasons
>
On 07/02/2010 12:08 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> Excerpts from Michael Schwendt's message of Fri Jul 02 11:34:38 +0200 2010:
>> On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 13:07:45 +0530, Rahul wrote:
>>
>>> IMO, there is absolutely nothing wrong with anyone
>>> with commit access updating packages in Rawhide
>>
>>
On 01/07/10 22:18, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2010/7/1 Orion Poplawski:
>> Are you planning on building perl-Net-CIDR-Lite for EL-6 soon, or shall I
>> build it? Thanks!
> I only maintainer perl-Net-CIDR (not the '-Lite' version) which I've
> updated and built in EL-6 just now.
It's Steve Pritchard
2010/7/2 Michael Schwendt :
> On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 11:40:11 +0200, Matěj wrote:
>
>> Dne 2.7.2010 11:34, Michael Schwendt napsal(a):
>> > Of course there is. There ought to be prior communication about such plans
>> > to upgrade a package. The primary package maintainer may have good reasons
>> > fo
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 10:33:52 +0100, Mark wrote:
>
>> ProvenPackagers are there precisely to do what it looks like happened
>> with : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=8618
>
> Wait a minute, it's not that easy. Provenpackagers are not supposed to
>
Author: mmaslano
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Test-Smoke/F-13
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv24555
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
perl-Test-Smoke.spec
Log Message:
* Fri Mar 26 2010 Marcela Mašláňová 1.43-1
- Specfile autogenerated by c
Patrice Dumas wrote:
> I think that this is very wrong. I don't know the specifics of this package
> either, but I remember that for one of my packages, I had to hold of
> correcting a FTBS because it meant upgrading, and I coudn't do that
> because of some incompatibilities.
So at least comment
Kevin Kofler píše v Pá 02. 07. 2010 v 04:06 +0200:
> Dan Horák wrote:
> > I will rebuild wxGTK without the internal crash handler for the the
> > devel/F14 branch so we can use ABRT to report crashes from wxGTK-based
> > apps. This will mean a rebuild of wxGTK with --disable-catch_segvs and
> > th
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=582163
Marcela Mašláňová changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
I get the feeling that no one on this thread has looked into
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/403
So this has already been handled by FESCo, mistakes have been made and
most likely will be avoided in the future.
Felix
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedor
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 11:42:10 +0100, Mark wrote:
> >> ProvenPackagers are there precisely to do what it looks like happened
> >> with : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=8618
> >
> > Wait a minute, it's not that easy. Provenpackagers are not supposed to
> > jump in every N m
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Dan Horák wrote:
> Kevin Kofler píše v Pá 02. 07. 2010 v 04:06 +0200:
>> Dan Horák wrote:
>> > I will rebuild wxGTK without the internal crash handler for the the
>> > devel/F14 branch so we can use ABRT to report crashes from wxGTK-based
>> > apps. This will mean
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 09:27:09AM +0200, Josephine Tannhäuser wrote:
> imho that you have to ask him now why he did this is an unbounded
> cheek. he has to ask or informyou BEFORE he twiddled with your
> package. This is a minimum of respect he should give to you as
> maintainer of this package!
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 03:13:55PM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On 7/1/10 2:55 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> > But I guess somehow it boils down to
> > "the majority wants that other people to work for them", which might
> > even be true. But in a FOSS community I doubt it is very healthy to
> > follow t
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 11:34 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 13:07:45 +0530, Rahul wrote:
>
> > IMO, there is absolutely nothing wrong with anyone
> > with commit access updating packages in Rawhide
>
> Of course there is. There ought to be prior communication about such pl
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 13:55 +0200, Léon Keijser wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 11:34 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 13:07:45 +0530, Rahul wrote:
> >
> > > IMO, there is absolutely nothing wrong with anyone
> > > with commit access updating packages in Rawhide
> >
> > Of
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 12:03:34PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 11:40:11 +0200, Matěj wrote:
>
> > Dne 2.7.2010 11:34, Michael Schwendt napsal(a):
> > > Of course there is. There ought to be prior communication about such plans
> > > to upgrade a package. The primary pack
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-4.fc13.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
On i386:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-4.fc13.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
Please resolve this as soon as
perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Data-Alias-1.07-6.fc13.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
On i386:
perl-Data-Alias-1.07-6.fc13.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extra
perl-DBI-Dumper has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-DBI-Dumper-2.01-8.fc12.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0)
On i386:
perl-DBI-Dumper-2.01-8.fc12.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extra
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 01:55:21PM +0200, Léon Keijser wrote:
> I think you are spot-on with this comment. There probably wouldn't be
> such a discussion if the (proven)packager simply stated his intentions
> to the package maintainer.
Just to step into this for a moment, but this wouldn't work (i
2010-07-02 03:18 keltezéssel, Kevin Kofler írta:
> Dave Airlie wrote:
>
>> So I've noticed maintainers of packages in Fedora seem to have a concept
>> of ownership, and I'm wondering if we could remove that word from usage
>> about maintainership.
>>
> +1
>
> IMHO any sponsored packager sho
I have just joined as a member and co-maintainer of the Fedora Design
Suite. Apparently, as a member of the Fedora community I am entitled
to the email alias foxmulder...@fedoraproject.org. Whereas
foxmulder881 is my username. Now I can't for the life of me get the
email alias to work correctly and
Compose started at Fri Jul 2 08:15:29 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
BackupPC-3.1.0-14.fc14.noarch requires perl-suidperl
FlightGear-2.0.0-2.fc14.i686 requires libosgText.so.55
FlightGear-2.0.0-2.fc14.i686 requires
On 07/02/2010 01:55 PM, Léon Keijser wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 11:34 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 13:07:45 +0530, Rahul wrote:
>>
>>
>>> IMO, there is absolutely nothing wrong with anyone
>>> with commit access updating packages in Rawhide
>>>
>> Of
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Peter Czanik wrote:
> 2010-07-02 03:18 keltezéssel, Kevin Kofler írta:
>> Dave Airlie wrote:
>>
>>> So I've noticed maintainers of packages in Fedora seem to have a concept
>>> of ownership, and I'm wondering if we could remove that word from usage
>>> about maintai
On 07/02/2010 01:58 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 13:55 +0200, Léon Keijser wrote:
>> On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 11:34 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>>> On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 13:07:45 +0530, Rahul wrote:
>>>
IMO, there is absolutely nothing wrong with anyone
with commit access
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 21:58:10 +1000, Dave wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 13:55 +0200, Léon Keijser wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 11:34 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > > On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 13:07:45 +0530, Rahul wrote:
> > >
> > > > IMO, there is absolutely nothing wrong with anyone
> > > >
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 01:33:05PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
>
> I do not want to be asked for trivial changes to my packages that fix
> bugs I neglected or rebuild it because of an update of a dependency. I
> am happy for every work I do not have to do and sending extra mails for
> such changes red
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 02:23:43PM +0200, Peter Czanik wrote:
> 2010-07-02 03:18 keltezéssel, Kevin Kofler írta:
> >
> > I think we need to get rid of the concept of ownership entirely, that'd
> > also
> > make orphaned or de-facto orphaned packages less of a problem. You see a
> > problem, you
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Chris Jones wrote:
> I have just joined as a member and co-maintainer of the Fedora Design
> Suite. Apparently, as a member of the Fedora community I am entitled
> to the email alias foxmulder...@fedoraproject.org. Whereas
> foxmulder881 is my username. Now I can't
Thomas Janssen píše v Pá 02. 07. 2010 v 13:21 +0200:
> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Dan Horák wrote:
> > Kevin Kofler píše v Pá 02. 07. 2010 v 04:06 +0200:
> >> Dan Horák wrote:
> >> > I will rebuild wxGTK without the internal crash handler for the the
> >> > devel/F14 branch so we can use AB
On 07/02/2010 04:17 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Chris Jones wrote:
>> I have just joined as a member and co-maintainer of the Fedora Design
>> Suite. Apparently, as a member of the Fedora community I am entitled
>> to the email alias foxmulder...@fedoraproject.org. Wh
2010/7/2 Patrice Dumas :
> On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 02:23:43PM +0200, Peter Czanik wrote:
>> 2010-07-02 03:18 keltezéssel, Kevin Kofler írta:
>> >
>> > I think we need to get rid of the concept of ownership entirely, that'd
>> > also
>> > make orphaned or de-facto orphaned packages less of a proble
On 07/02/2010 06:46 PM, Patrice Dumas wrote:
>
> In the past we proposed a policy for that kind of issues with Rahul,
> but it was never approved (nor really considered).
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RahulSundaram/CollectiveMaintenance
I had forgotten about this but since becoming provenpac
Hello,
2010-07-02 14:48 keltezéssel, Thomas Janssen írta:
> +1
>> I'd like to get syslog-ng updated to the latest version in Rawhide (I
>> work part time for the upstream developer and I'm also an occasional
>> Fedora user). I contacted the package owner, no response. Created a
>> bugreport to get
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 09:36:34PM +0800, Chen Lei wrote:
>
> I think escalating to FESCo is only suitable for changes which are
> controversial between different people, we should have another policy
> to treat those non-responsive issues, maintainers should respond on
> bugzilla report in time.
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 07:15:54PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
> I had forgotten about this but since becoming provenpackager I have
> helped out in simple rebuilds or even version bumps on occasions and
> have gotten positive feedback.
You mean that you didn't only send a patch but you did c
On 07/02/2010 07:27 PM, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 07:15:54PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> I had forgotten about this but since becoming provenpackager I have
>> helped out in simple rebuilds or even version bumps on occasions and
>> have gotten positive feedback.
> You mea
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 07:29:33PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > You mean that you didn't only send a patch but you did commit
> > version bumps without prior communication with the maintainer
> > or with a maintainer not responding to your offer to do a
> > version bump?
>
> I offered to d
On 07/02/2010 07:37 PM, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> Ok, this policy was for the other case, a case when the maintainer
> does not respond. I am not saying that it happens a lot, but it
> happened in the past, and the syslog-ng case exposed in the thread is
> another recent case. Maybe a policy is not n
Hi,
I have orphaned perl-TermReadKey, for Fedora 11-devel, EPEL 4,5.
Anyone interested, please take it.
Stepan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi all,
I have a pretty simple question:
Is there a way to "subscribe" to certain packages in bodhi so that I get
a notification via mail whenever updates are queued for it or pushes
happen? That would be pretty useful for monitoring changes of
dependencies, so I have enough time to make sure my pa
Just a headsup: I've just built webkitgtk-1.3.2 in rawhide, which
changes library sonames, so things depending on it will have to be
rebuilt.
repoquery says that the following packages might be affected:
anjuta
awn-extras-applets
cairo-dock-plug-ins-webkit
claws-mail-plugins-fancy
devhelp
empathy
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 16:33 +0200, Julian Aloofi wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have a pretty simple question:
> Is there a way to "subscribe" to certain packages in bodhi so that I get
> a notification via mail whenever updates are queued for it or pushes
> happen? That would be pretty useful for monitoring
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 8:06 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> Just a headsup: I've just built webkitgtk-1.3.2 in rawhide, which
> changes library sonames, so things depending on it will have to be
> rebuilt.
lekhonee-gnome rebuild done.
Kushal
--
http://fedoraproject.org
http://kushaldas.in
--
deve
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 11:28:09PM -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
> I don't think it really matters what we call it, I just think that
> package maintainers are starting to get a sense of entitlement and I
> feel that's counter productive to the open environment we're used to
> and are trying to help co
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 10:36 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> Just a headsup: I've just built webkitgtk-1.3.2 in rawhide, which
> changes library sonames, so things depending on it will have to be
> rebuilt.
claws-mail-plugins rebuild done
- Andreas
--
BRef Andreas Bierfert, M.Sc. | http://awbsw
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 09:53:00AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 07/02/2010 09:37 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > On 07/02/2010 12:57 PM, Josephine Tannhäuser wrote:
> >> It's seems to me that you have to be an employee of red hat to get the
> >> privilegue to deal arbitrarily with all packages
On 2 July 2010 17:00, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>> They were granted access to all perl-packages, because they are @RH.
>> Probably because it is their paid job to work on these packages.
>>
> Ralf, you need to stop repeating this particular line when I have repeatedly
> told you that working for Red
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 11:26:32AM +0200, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> Dne 2.7.2010 09:37, Rahul Sundaram napsal(a):
> > On 07/02/2010 12:57 PM, Josephine Tannhäuser wrote:
> >> It's seems to me that you have to be an employee of red hat to get the
> >> privilegue to deal arbitrarily with all packages.
>
Am Freitag, den 02.07.2010, 17:02 +0200 schrieb Andreas Bierfert:
> On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 16:33 +0200, Julian Aloofi wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I have a pretty simple question:
> > Is there a way to "subscribe" to certain packages in bodhi so that I get
> > a notification via mail whenever updates are
On 07/02/2010 06:00 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 09:53:00AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> On 07/02/2010 09:37 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>>>On 07/02/2010 12:57 PM, Josephine Tannhäuser wrote:
It's seems to me that you have to be an employee of red hat to get the
>>
On 07/02/2010 06:07 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 2 July 2010 17:00, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>>> They were granted access to all perl-packages, because they are @RH.
>>> Probably because it is their paid job to work on these packages.
>>>
>> Ralf, you need to stop repeating this particular line wh
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 06:33 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Fedora Legacy has shown how well this works… not!
>
> I completely agree with Ralf Corsepius and Tom Lane on this subject: this
> policy is very unhelpful, and applying it to security updates is just
> totally insane. We're going to see m
On 07/02/2010 06:20 PM, Will Woods wrote:
> The main reasons we want to perform testing are things like: to avoid
> pushing updates with broken dependencies, or updates that cause serious
> regressions requiring manual intervention / emergency update
> replacements. That sort of thing.
>
Should b
On 07/02/2010 12:09 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> It's in stable now. The time in testing allowed us to fix and add
> several more packages to it and confirm that it did indeed fix things.
Maybe it's still being propagated, but when I did update --skip-broken
followed by yum update, right now (Fri Jul
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 06:15:44PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 07/02/2010 06:00 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 09:53:00AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >> The Petr's are apparent newbies/newcomers.
> >>
> >> They were granted access to all perl-packages, because they
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7/2/10 9:18 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> I had to apply and justify the reasons why I wanted to be a
>> > provenpackager.
> I know you did, but the Petr's did not. Their presumable supervisor @RH
> (Marcella) rushed them through the process and the
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 12:41:18 -0400, Przemek wrote:
> On 07/02/2010 12:09 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > It's in stable now. The time in testing allowed us to fix and add
> > several more packages to it and confirm that it did indeed fix things.
>
> Maybe it's still being propagated, but when I did
On Fri, 2 Jul 2010, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 07/02/2010 06:00 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 09:53:00AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >> On 07/02/2010 09:37 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >>>On 07/02/2010 12:57 PM, Josephine Tannhäuser wrote:
> It's seems to me tha
On 07/02/2010 12:47 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 12:41:18 -0400, Przemek wrote:
>
>> On 07/02/2010 12:09 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>
>>> It's in stable now. The time in testing allowed us to fix and add
>>> several more packages to it and confirm that it did indeed fix things.
>>
tibbs added a Fedora EPEL 5 branch for perl-PatchReader
Package perl-PatchReader in Fedora EPEL 5 is now owned by pfrields
tibbs approved watchbugzilla on perl-PatchReader (Fedora EPEL 5) for perl-sig
tibbs approved watchcommits on perl-PatchReader (Fedora EPEL 5) for perl-sig
tibbs approved commit
tibbs added a Fedora EPEL 6 branch for perl-PatchReader
Package perl-PatchReader in Fedora EPEL 6 is now owned by pfrields
tibbs approved watchbugzilla on perl-PatchReader (Fedora EPEL 6) for perl-sig
tibbs approved watchcommits on perl-PatchReader (Fedora EPEL 6) for perl-sig
tibbs approved commit
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Julian Aloofi
wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have a pretty simple question:
> Is there a way to "subscribe" to certain packages in bodhi so that I get
> a notification via mail whenever updates are queued for it or pushes
> happen? That would be pretty useful for monitoring c
Hi,
I packaged monit a while ago but never really got around to using it as I
found Nagios to be more suitable for my needs... I do not mind continuing to
package Monit, but seeing as I rarely use it myself it would be great if
someone who does would like to co-maintain it and help troublesho
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 12:20:21PM -0400, Will Woods wrote:
> Therefore: I propose that we choose a few metrics ("turnaround time on
> security updates", "average number of live updates with broken
> dependencies per day", etc.). Then we begin measuring them (and, if
> possible, collect historical
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 04:33:20PM +0200, Julian Aloofi wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have a pretty simple question:
> Is there a way to "subscribe" to certain packages in bodhi so that I get
> a notification via mail whenever updates are queued for it or pushes
> happen? That would be pretty useful for mon
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 02:48:26PM -0400, Luke Macken wrote:
> For critical path updates to be approved for pushing to the stable
> repository, they now require a minimum karma of 2, consisting of a +1
> from a single proventester, and a +1 from another authenticated user.
I am just wondering, is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7/2/10 11:27 AM, Till Maas wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 02:48:26PM -0400, Luke Macken wrote:
>
>> For critical path updates to be approved for pushing to the stable
>> repository, they now require a minimum karma of 2, consisting of a +1
>> fro
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 20:27:27 +0200
Till Maas wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 02:48:26PM -0400, Luke Macken wrote:
>
> > For critical path updates to be approved for pushing to the stable
> > repository, they now require a minimum karma of 2, consisting of a
> > +1 from a single proventester, an
On Thu, 1 Jul 2010 13:32:20 -0600, Kevin wrote:
> > The page "Package Change Requests for existing packages" is unclear:
> >
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure#Package_Change_Requests_for_existing_packages
> >
> > Please expand on what "explanatory text" you w
On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 21:50:08 +0200
Michael Schwendt wrote:
...snip...
> > - You are not the owner and want to maintain in epel. Did you
> > contact the fedora owner and wait and/or hear back that they didn't
> > want to maintain it?
>
> How would I know that this would be relevant? And why is it
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 12:48:43PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 20:27:27 +0200
> Till Maas wrote:
> >Also they are about the "important packages",
> > which is a subset of critical path.
>
> Superset. :) In any case, the items mentioned there should be
> implemented. Bodhi ca
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 12:48:43PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I have updated the page.
>
> Does it look clear now? Re-wording or tweaks very welcome.
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_acceptance_criteria
Btw. does Bodhi really work the way it is said there? What happens if
th
Hi all,
since I'll be entering college soon, I'm revisiting my workload (I'll
continue to work on Sugar and Etherpad). I'm using neither of the
following applications (nodm was originally intended to be used for
sugar-related work) and since both avogadro and nodm have a few open
bugs which I've b
Am Freitag, den 02.07.2010, 19:31 +0200 schrieb Thomas Janssen:
> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Julian Aloofi
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I have a pretty simple question:
> > Is there a way to "subscribe" to certain packages in bodhi so that I get
> > a notification via mail whenever updates are qu
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Nicu Buculei wrote:
>
>
> I just added him to the Design Team group so his alias should start
> working.
>
> --
> nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com/
>
>
Thanks. Yes it is now working correctly.
Regards
--
Chris Jones
Photographic Imaging
Will Woods wrote:
> The main reasons we want to perform testing are things like: to avoid
> pushing updates with broken dependencies
The right way to prevent that is to get AutoQA completed, which will, if it
works as intended, automatically detect and throw out updates with broken
dependencies
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
