On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 11:40:11 +0200, Matěj wrote: > Dne 2.7.2010 11:34, Michael Schwendt napsal(a): > > Of course there is. There ought to be prior communication about such plans > > to upgrade a package. The primary package maintainer may have good reasons > > for not upgrading the package. Just ask! > > The primary package maintainer (see the other thread about "owning" a > package) who has a package 8 months in FTBFS doesn't have much rights in > my thinking.
The provenpackager, who has had 8 month to notice such a problem, has had 8 months to start the non-responsive maintainer procedure. What will happen the next time the package is affected by a bad problem? Does the same provenpackager now keep an eye on the package and will be available to fix it much sooner? Or will it takes 8 months again, because that is possible in the Fedora package collection? > Matěj > > </thread> Feel free to consider it closed and don't reply anymore. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
