The eternal glory and basking in the shite of the FLOSS gods' favour
waits for somebody who will be willing to repackage xorg-x11-fonts
according to the current font guidelines.
Unfortunately, I just don't want to pretend anymore, I will have a time
in next couple of months to do it, so I have
Dne 29.5.2010 09:03, Matěj Cepl napsal(a):
> The eternal glory and basking in the shite of the FLOSS gods' favour
^
ehm, that should be "shine" ...
Matěj
--
Don't anthropomorphize computers. They don't like it.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedo
On 29 May 2010 05:57, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ATM, I am observing this:
>
> # repoquery -qa 'nss-softokn-freebl*'
> nss-softokn-freebl-0:3.12.4-19.fc13.x86_64
> nss-softokn-freebl-0:3.12.4-17.fc13.i686
> nss-softokn-freebl-devel-0:3.12.4-19.fc13.x86_64
> nss-softokn-freebl-devel-0:3.12.4-
Compose started at Sat May 29 08:15:05 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
almanah-0.7.3-1.fc14.i686 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.12
1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.i686 requires libgladeui-1.so.9
dates-0.4.11-3.fc14.i686 requ
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 09:12:31AM +0200, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> Dne 29.5.2010 09:03, Matěj Cepl napsal(a):
> > The eternal glory and basking in the shite of the FLOSS gods' favour
> ^
> ehm, that should be "shine" ...
Now there's a freudian slip!
--
Matt
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 09:12:31 +0200,
Matěj Cepl wrote:
> Dne 29.5.2010 09:03, Matěj Cepl napsal(a):
> > The eternal glory and basking in the shite of the FLOSS gods' favour
> ^
> ehm, that should be "shine" ...
I figured it was one of two possible
On Sat, 2010-05-29 at 09:12 +0200, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> Dne 29.5.2010 09:03, Matěj Cepl napsal(a):
> > The eternal glory and basking in the shite of the FLOSS gods' favour
> ^
> ehm, that should be "shine" ...
>
No - I think you may have gotten right th
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Jon Masters wrote:
>> Didn't we "decide" that Fedora was intended for more technical users? I
>> don't see many technical users crying out for a hammered shut init
>> system where they feel like they have to go to their auto mechanic to
>> attach the right magic dongle to fix
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 07:27:57PM +0200, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Jon Masters wrote:
> >> Didn't we "decide" that Fedora was intended for more technical users? I
> >> don't see many technical users crying out for a hammered shut init
> >> system where they feel like they hav
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Jeremy Sanders wrote:
>>
>> You're suggesting hammering shut the insides of linux to stop people
>> playing around and reducing freedom - sounds like you want Fedora to be
>> like the products of other large propitiatory systems.
>
> C code can be changed too, if really neede
Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> - having control of the mixer
The KMix ALSA backend is not going away.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/KDE_PulseAudio_Integration#Release_Notes
> I need to change firewalls rules and routing rules in the middle of the
> init scripts, because I have a multihomed int
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Roberto Ragusa wrote:
>> I need to change firewalls rules and routing rules in the middle of the
>> init scripts, because I have a multihomed internet connection and remote
>> filesystems and I need the firewall closed and then opened in a way which
>> is dependent on the IP
Hello Kairo,
Fedora is still shipping version 1.23 of atop. An updated rpm of atop
1.25 is available from http://atoptool.nl . Gerlof seems to be the
packager.
Let me know if I could help.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/
--
devel
On 05/28/2010 10:45 PM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> Fedora is still shipping version 1.23 of atop. An updated rpm of atop
> 1.25 is available from http://atoptool.nl . Gerlof seems to be the
> packager.
the best way to monitor *automatically* a package is with
"Upstream Release Monitoring":
https:
On 05/23/2010 08:25 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> I don't think anyone thinks rebuilding the builders every 6 months (and
> fixing all the bugs that comes with that) is a good use of their time.
6 in the worst case, 12 in the best.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fe
On 05/22/2010 11:06 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Sat, 22.05.10 18:30, Xose Vazquez Perez (xose.vazq...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>>
>> Is it worth using tmpfs for some directories(/var/run, lock...) ?
>
> Yes. But this requires some changes all across the distro, just have a
> look at the output o
TeX Live 2009 and Ruby 1.9
JBoss[1] is still a *big* deficit. Potential for f14/15 ?
[1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JBoss
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
2010/5/30 Xose Vazquez Perez :
>
> TeX Live 2009 and Ruby 1.9
>
>
> JBoss[1] is still a *big* deficit. Potential for f14/15 ?
>
>
> [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JBoss
>
For Texlive 2010 and Ruby 1.9,See
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/TeXLive
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Ruby
So, tor-0.2.1.25-1200.fc12 is in updates-testing for Fedora 12.
It has a subpackage, tor-lsb, which provides the standard old-style init
scripts. There's another "tor-upstart" package, which I presume does the new
thing. Maybe soon we'll get "tor-systemd". And maybe eventually Fedora will
settle o
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 00:39:14 -0400,
Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> So, clearly, there's some disagreement about what's fixed and what's broken.
> But printing out a passive-agressive warning to end-users is not the
> solution. The error message is confusing and very, very unhelpful. Worse,
> it'
2010/5/30 Bruno Wolff III :
> On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 00:39:14 -0400,
> Matthew Miller wrote:
>>
>> So, clearly, there's some disagreement about what's fixed and what's broken.
>> But printing out a passive-agressive warning to end-users is not the
>> solution. The error message is confusing and
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 12:06:12AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> See: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/347
Yeah, I remember this coming up before with the issue of zillions of
dependencies.
The problem here is the output. I know (as discussed in that ticket,
actually) that the Fedora guide
2010/5/30 Matthew Miller :
> On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 12:06:12AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> See: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/347
>
> Yeah, I remember this coming up before with the issue of zillions of
> dependencies.
>
> The problem here is the output. I know (as discussed in that t
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 01:38:15PM +0800, Chen Lei wrote:
> It's actually the same problem and both caused by the misusing of
> redhat-lsb. The tor package looks very different from other daemons in
> fedora, e.g. vsftpd squid etc, a small package with so many
> subpackages and a metapackage seems
24 matches
Mail list logo
