2010/5/30 Bruno Wolff III <br...@wolff.to>: > On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 00:39:14 -0400, > Matthew Miller <mat...@mattdm.org> wrote: >> >> So, clearly, there's some disagreement about what's fixed and what's broken. >> But printing out a passive-agressive warning to end-users is not the >> solution. The error message is confusing and very, very unhelpful. Worse, >> it's not _meant_ to be helpful to the poor end user -- it's meant to try to >> goad the other packager into action. Such things need to be taken up with >> FESCO, not fought about in user-visible debug output. > > See: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/347 > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >
I don't why the tor maintainer don't want to keep consistence with fedora package guideline and tor upstream. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
