Re: not all that qualified...

2017-06-02 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 2.6.2017 v 13:03 Michael Schwendt napsal(a): > On Thu, 01 Jun 2017 02:29:53 +, Christopher wrote: > >> Do you have a link to an explanation of the automated fedora-review >> process, and/or some of these step-by-step checklists you mention? > fedora-review is a tool and a package with the

Re: not all that qualified...

2017-06-02 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Thu, 01 Jun 2017 02:29:53 +, Christopher wrote: > Do you have a link to an explanation of the automated fedora-review > process, and/or some of these step-by-step checklists you mention? fedora-review is a tool and a package with the same name. You simply point it at a bugzilla ticket numb

Re: not all that qualified...

2017-06-01 Thread David Muse
Thanks everyone. Good info. I'll put it to good use. Dave david.m...@firstworks.com On 6/1/2017 4:33 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 1.6.2017 v 03:03 Susi Lehtola napsal(a): On 05/31/2017 05:19 PM, Christopher wrote: On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 6:44 PM David Muse mailto:david.m...@firstworks.com>>

Re: not all that qualified...

2017-06-01 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 1.6.2017 v 03:03 Susi Lehtola napsal(a): > On 05/31/2017 05:19 PM, Christopher wrote: >> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 6:44 PM David Muse > > wrote: >> >> Hello all, >> >> I have a fairly large package that needs review: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/s

Re: not all that qualified...

2017-05-31 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 5:40 AM, Christopher wrote: > I've looked at that wiki page before, and found it a bit of an information > overload. I don't think anyone would argue with that. > There's tons of information about the general process, but it's > not exactly an easy-to-follow step-by-step c

Re: not all that qualified...

2017-05-31 Thread Christopher
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 10:36 PM Alexander Ploumistos < alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 5:29 AM, Christopher > wrote: > > Do you have a link to an explanation of the automated fedora-review > process, and/or some of these step-by-step checklists you mention? > > Plenty

Re: not all that qualified...

2017-05-31 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 5:29 AM, Christopher wrote: > Do you have a link to an explanation of the automated fedora-review process, > and/or some of these step-by-step checklists you mention? Plenty of links to follow in there: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process And this is the

Re: not all that qualified...

2017-05-31 Thread Christopher
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 9:04 PM Susi Lehtola wrote: > On 05/31/2017 05:19 PM, Christopher wrote: > > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 6:44 PM David Muse > > wrote: > > > > Hello all, > > > > I have a fairly large package that needs review: > > https://bugzill

Re: not all that qualified...

2017-05-31 Thread Susi Lehtola
On 05/31/2017 05:19 PM, Christopher wrote: On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 6:44 PM David Muse > wrote: Hello all, I have a fairly large package that needs review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1415612 and I've been offered a few review sw

Re: not all that qualified...

2017-05-31 Thread Christopher
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 6:44 PM David Muse wrote: > Hello all, > > I have a fairly large package that needs review: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1415612 > > and I've been offered a few review swaps for it, but the trouble is, I > don't really feel well qualified to review package

not all that qualified...

2017-05-31 Thread David Muse
Hello all, I have a fairly large package that needs review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1415612 and I've been offered a few review swaps for it, but the trouble is, I don't really feel well qualified to review packages yet. I only maintain one other package (a pre-requisite fo