On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 at 07:14, Daniel P. Berrangé
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 11:33:35AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 01:18:35PM -0500, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> > > On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 at 12:50, Fabio Valentini
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > > If this is not
On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 11:33:35AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 01:18:35PM -0500, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> > On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 at 12:50, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > > > If this is not what 'proven packagers' are allowed to do, it might be
> > > good to h
On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 01:18:35PM -0500, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 at 12:50, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 6:03 PM Stephen Smoogen
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 at 11:49, Fabio Valentini
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 10:05 A
On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 06:27:41PM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> Il 06/01/25 18:50, Fabio Valentini ha scritto:
> > On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 6:03 PM Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> >> On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 at 11:49, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 10:05 AM Mattia Verga via devel
On Mon, 2025-01-06 at 17:49 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 10:05 AM Mattia Verga via devel
> wrote:
> >
> > Despite 0.16 being available as tag in repository since 2015,
> > libnova
> > was never updated and it's still 0.15 in Fedora.
> >
> > I have notified the package m
Il 06/01/25 18:50, Fabio Valentini ha scritto:
> On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 6:03 PM Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>> On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 at 11:49, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 10:05 AM Mattia Verga via devel
>>> wrote:
Despite 0.16 being available as tag in repository since 2015, l
On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 at 12:50, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 6:03 PM Stephen Smoogen
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 at 11:49, Fabio Valentini
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 10:05 AM Mattia Verga via devel
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Despite 0.16 being available as
On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 6:03 PM Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
> On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 at 11:49, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 10:05 AM Mattia Verga via devel
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Despite 0.16 being available as tag in repository since 2015, libnova
>> > was never updated and it's sti
On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 at 11:49, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 10:05 AM Mattia Verga via devel
> wrote:
> >
> > Despite 0.16 being available as tag in repository since 2015, libnova
> > was never updated and it's still 0.15 in Fedora.
> >
> > I have notified the package maintainer
On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 10:05 AM Mattia Verga via devel
wrote:
>
> Despite 0.16 being available as tag in repository since 2015, libnova
> was never updated and it's still 0.15 in Fedora.
>
> I have notified the package maintainer long ago [1], but I never got a
> reply. So I plan to push an update
10 matches
Mail list logo