On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 14:51:29 +0530
Parag Nemade wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I kind of miss the overview of supported releases that was
> > available in old version.
> >
> > It would be nice if this overview was part of the landing page with
> > links to the release detail pages:
> > https://bodhi.fedo
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Richard Marko wrote:
> On 08/20/2015 05:45 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> Greetings.
>>
>> After a longer than expected outage window, I'm happy to report that
>> bodhi2 is now live in production at
>>
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates
>> or
>> https://bod
On 08/20/2015 05:45 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> After a longer than expected outage window, I'm happy to report that
> bodhi2 is now live in production at
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates
> or
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/
>
> The web interface should be available and w
On 23/08/15 18:41 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 23/08/15 16:36 -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
No, sorry, but that is not true. I wrote those update notes in the Bodhi 1
web interfac
On Sun, 2015-08-23 at 22:23 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> > In the case of Kevin's update, the problem is that markdown lists
> > must
> > have an empty new line before them, like so:
> >
> > A paragraph of text:
> >
> > * first item
> > * second item
> >
> > Kevin, you us
On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 23/08/15 16:36 -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>>
>> No, sorry, but that is not true. I wrote those update notes in the Bodhi 1
>>> web interface, so of course I looked at
On 23/08/15 16:36 -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
No, sorry, but that is not true. I wrote those update notes in the Bodhi 1
web interface, so of course I looked at the resulting formatting. Bodhi 1
interpreted that syntax as a list, not as
Hi
On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> No, sorry, but that is not true. I wrote those update notes in the Bodhi 1
> web interface, so of course I looked at the resulting formatting. Bodhi 1
> interpreted that syntax as a list, not as a single paragraph. This is a
> change in Bo
Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> not sure about Apper
Apper shows the raw text, it has no Markdown parser.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> In the case of Kevin's update, the problem is that markdown lists must
> have an empty new line before them, like so:
>
> A paragraph of text:
>
> * first item
> * second item
>
> Kevin, you used the following, which indeed the Markdown parser turns
> into a single paragr
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 08/21/2015 06:02 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 05:27:37 +0200
>> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>
>>> Upstreams, yes, but not Fedora. Fedora should be self-hosted.
>>
>>
>> Can you please define "Fedora" and "self-hosted
On 08/21/2015 06:02 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 05:27:37 +0200
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Upstreams, yes, but not Fedora. Fedora should be self-hosted.
Can you please define "Fedora" and "self-hosted" as you use them above?
A domain 100& operated and owned by Fedora (rsp. RH) and
--
Mathieu
On Sat, 2015-08-22 at 19:27 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> FWIW I think the new version looks much nicer than the old one.
> Hopefully the issues will be ironed out.
>
> On Thu, 2015-08-20 at 17:48 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > * The formatting of the update notes has changed in
FWIW I think the new version looks much nicer than the old one.
Hopefully the issues will be ironed out.
On Thu, 2015-08-20 at 17:48 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> * The formatting of the update notes has changed in some ways (line
> breaks
> gone missing?), breaking my nicely formatted notes, e.g
On Saturday, August 22, 2015, Haïkel wrote:
>
> If you want your bugs to be fixed, posting them on a list and
> ignoring the bug tracker doesn't work.
I didn't ignore it, I've reported several bugs against various component
since years ago.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.
Am 22.08.2015 um 12:20 schrieb Haïkel:
2015-08-22 12:07 GMT+02:00 Reindl Harald :
come on the bugtracker also don't work
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226509#c5
Thanks for definitively killing this thread by posting something unrelated
like your accusing post without *any*
2015-08-22 12:07 GMT+02:00 Reindl Harald :
>
> come on the bugtracker also don't work
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226509#c5
>
Thanks for definitively killing this thread by posting something unrelated.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproj
Am 22.08.2015 um 10:48 schrieb Haïkel:
2015-08-22 4:46 GMT+02:00 Christopher Meng :
Occupying the moral high ground doesn't help as well.
If you want your bugs to be fixed, posting them on a list and
ignoring the bug tracker doesn't work.
come on the bugtracker also don't work
https://bug
2015-08-22 4:46 GMT+02:00 Christopher Meng :
>
> Occupying the moral high ground doesn't help as well.
> --
>
> Yours sincerely,
> Christopher Meng
>
If you want your bugs to be fixed, posting them on a list and
ignoring the bug tracker doesn't work.
And for people who don't want to go through gi
On Fri, 21 Aug, 2015 at 05:20:32 GMT, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Unlike yesterday, I am now seeing green "push to stable" buttons for
> packages which have been in "testing" for longer times (weeks, months).
>
> However, I am not seeing these buttons for packages, which I had
> submitted in recent p
On Sat, 2015-08-22 at 10:46 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> On 8/22/15, Haïkel wrote:
> > Sometimes, I wonder if you're not doing this on purpose.
> >
> > Rather than preventing our infrastructure team to fix the actual
> > issues
> > with useless squabbles, just open tickets to let them know.
>
On 8/22/15, Haïkel wrote:
> Sometimes, I wonder if you're not doing this on purpose.
>
> Rather than preventing our infrastructure team to fix the actual issues
> with useless squabbles, just open tickets to let them know.
> Forget the ridiculous github excuse, fedorahosted trac instance still
> a
Sometimes, I wonder if you're not doing this on purpose.
Rather than preventing our infrastructure team to fix the actual issues
with useless squabbles, just open tickets to let them know.
Forget the ridiculous github excuse, fedorahosted trac instance still
accepts tickets.
Out of respect of the
And another annoyance: The search box appears not to work in KHTML
(Return/Enter does nothing) nor even in KWebKitPart/QtWebKit (I get sent to
a URL with the search term in it, but it just displays the same front page
as before).
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedorapr
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> It's markdown.
But it eats all line breaks and so breaks basic Markdown formatting such as
enumerations that worked fine in Bodhi 1.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> No. While we could roll back, it would be a great deal of pain and
> outage, and IMHO things are not "completely and utterly broken". There
> are bugs, we are fixing them, and much faster than we would be using
> the old codebase.
Given how we are dealing with data CORRUPTED b
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 12:39:40 +0200
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Documentation, please!
>
> How to enter well-formatted comments? Is anything like BB-Code
> supported? Or Wiki syntax? Or other formatting hints?
>
> I hope the comments field is not only for 2-3 words in twitter-style.
It's markdown
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 05:27:37 +0200
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Upstreams, yes, but not Fedora. Fedora should be self-hosted.
Can you please define "Fedora" and "self-hosted" as you use them above?
Fedora is part of the larger open source community.
Fedora Infrastructure uses 100% open source softwa
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 01:56:02 +0200
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Theres a bunch of tools out there to export issues from github
>
> They can turn this off at any moment, leaving you with no way to get
> your data out.
Yep. This is the case for any project using non free tools...
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 09:08:18 +0100
Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 21/08/15 08:46, Till Hofmann wrote:
>
> > On 08/21/2015 09:00 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >>
> >> Anywas, this time bodhi offered me a "push to testing" and "push to
> >> stable" (!) button (Note: "push to stable")
> >>
> >> I used "pushe
On 08/21/2015 04:03 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 09:00:29 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 08/21/2015 08:34 AM, Till Hofmann wrote:
Also, it seems like I can revoke other people's updates. At least I
could press the 'Revoke' button and I received a confirmation
notification.
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 09:00:29 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > On 08/21/2015 08:34 AM, Till Hofmann wrote:
> >> Also, it seems like I can revoke other people's updates. At least I
> >> could press the 'Revoke' button and I received a confirmation
> >> notification. Also, instead of the Revoke butto
On 08/20/2015 07:40 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 19 August 2015 at 22:24, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 08/20/2015 06:08 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
On 8/20/15, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Thanks for your patience as we roll out this new bodhi version.
"This update has reached 3 days in testing
On Thursday, August 20, 2015 07:02:51 PM Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 08/20/2015 06:00 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 17:55:01 +0200
> >
> > Kevin Kofler wrote:
> >> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >>> I share this view. I refuse to create a github account and do not
> >>> consider using an
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 21:45:56 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> After a longer than expected outage window, I'm happy to report that
> bodhi2 is now live in production at
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates
> or
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/
>
> The web interface should be
Am 21.08.2015 um 10:40 schrieb Charles-Antoine Couret:
and somebody again didn't care about fedora-easy-karma which in 2015 is long
broken than working with several issues - no, i don't want to log into a
webinterface and seek packages for karma by hand while verify it's the same
build running
> and somebody again didn't care about fedora-easy-karma which in 2015 is long
> broken than working with several issues - no, i don't want to log into a
> webinterface and seek packages for karma by hand while verify it's the same
> build running on my machine...
>
> Getting list of installed
Am 20.08.2015 um 05:45 schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
Greetings.
After a longer than expected outage window, I'm happy to report that
bodhi2 is now live in production at
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates
or
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/
The web interface should be available and working for ad
On 21/08/15 08:46, Till Hofmann wrote:
On 08/21/2015 09:00 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Anywas, this time bodhi offered me a "push to testing" and "push to
stable" (!) button (Note: "push to stable")
I used "pushed to testing" to re-push it.
I just tested "push to stable" on an unpushed updat
On 08/21/2015 09:00 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>
> Anywas, this time bodhi offered me a "push to testing" and "push to
> stable" (!) button (Note: "push to stable")
>
> I used "pushed to testing" to re-push it.
>
I just tested "push to stable" on an unpushed update: Despite the name,
it pushes
On 08/21/2015 08:47 AM, Till Hofmann wrote:
On 08/21/2015 08:34 AM, Till Hofmann wrote:
Also, it seems like I can revoke other people's updates. At least I
could press the 'Revoke' button and I received a confirmation
notification. Also, instead of the Revoke button, there is now a "Push
to Te
On 08/21/2015 08:34 AM, Till Hofmann wrote:
> Also, it seems like I can revoke other people's updates. At least I
> could press the 'Revoke' button and I received a confirmation
> notification. Also, instead of the Revoke button, there is now a "Push
> to Testing" and a "Push to Stable" button. B
Why can I push to testing for updates submitted by other people, and
where the update is already stable? [1]
Also, it seems like I can revoke other people's updates. At least I
could press the 'Revoke' button and I received a confirmation
notification. Also, instead of the Revoke button, there is n
On 08/20/2015 07:39 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Well, I don't know if there was a Big Philosophical Discussion, but in
practice all kinds of Fedora-ish stuff has its upstream in github these
days, so yes, clearly times have changed.
That's not the point. I am talking about separating Fedora
we
"This update has reached 3 days in testing and can be pushed to stable
now if the maintainer wishes"
2 days ago, 2015-08-18 07:00:53
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/libdom-0.1.2-1.fc23
Still can't push.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://awk.io
--
devel mailing list
devel@l
On 08/20/2015 06:24 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 08/20/2015 06:08 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
On 8/20/15, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Thanks for your patience as we roll out this new bodhi version.
"This update has reached 3 days in testing and can be pushed to stable
now if the maintainer wishes"
"
On 08/20/2015 07:51 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 12:33:37 -0500
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 08/20/2015 12:02 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
To me any non fedora/redhat supplied account system is inacceptable,
This applies to github, sourceforge, farcebook, nitter, goggle, or
else
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Theres a bunch of tools out there to export issues from github
They can turn this off at any moment, leaving you with no way to get your
data out.
>> > and exposes our code to a much wider (*1000 at least) group of
>> > developers,
>>
>> If a developer wants to contribute t
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 00:39:20 +0200
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > This is correct. The infra team discussed this some time ago and
> > since Github does nothing to lock up the resources we care about,
>
> So you'd only see lock-in to proprietary infrastructure as a problem
> i
On Friday, August 21, 2015, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> vs.
> 1'. clone the upstream repository,
> 2'. commit your change(s) to the clone,
> 3'. export your patch(es) with git format-patch,
> 4'. open an issue through a web interface,
> 5'. attach the patch(es) to the issue
> (except of course on GitH
Paul W. Frields wrote:
> This is correct. The infra team discussed this some time ago and
> since Github does nothing to lock up the resources we care about,
So you'd only see lock-in to proprietary infrastructure as a problem if they
were actively locking things up?
Even if now, everything can
I wrote:
> Unfortunately, there are several things that have become worse:
PS: Some more:
* The nice colored and unique icons were replaced with text-only with a
color scheme that is the same for all fields (e.g., orange for both
"testing" and "bugfix"), or even black&white text (in the list o
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 02:40:10PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 22:24:18 +0200
> Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> > But this is a project where Fedora *is* upstream!
>
> I assume you mean "bodhi" by "this".
>
> The primary bodhi developers are heavily involved in Fedora, but are
> al
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:40:40AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-08-20 at 12:33 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > On 08/20/2015 12:02 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > >
> > > To me any non fedora/redhat supplied account system is
> > > inacceptable,
> > >
> > > This applies to gi
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 22:24:18 +0200
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> But this is a project where Fedora *is* upstream!
I assume you mean "bodhi" by "this".
The primary bodhi developers are heavily involved in Fedora, but are
also involved in other communities. When is a project "Fedora" ?
There are other
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> IMHO, I think projects should be free to choose whatever tools they
> wish to build their project. You are of course free to choose to not
> use that application/project based on that or other factors.
>
> Closed source applications are not something we ever want to run in
> F
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 11:19:10AM -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 21:45 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Greetings.
> >
> > After a longer than expected outage window, I'm happy to report that
> > bodhi2 is now live in production at
> >
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 12:33:37 -0500
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 08/20/2015 12:02 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >
> > To me any non fedora/redhat supplied account system is inacceptable,
> >
> > This applies to github, sourceforge, farcebook, nitter, goggle, or
> > else - period.
>
> The last ti
On Thu, 2015-08-20 at 12:33 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 08/20/2015 12:02 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >
> > To me any non fedora/redhat supplied account system is
> > inacceptable,
> >
> > This applies to github, sourceforge, farcebook, nitter, goggle, or
> > else - period.
>
> The l
On 19 August 2015 at 22:24, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 08/20/2015 06:08 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
>>
>> On 8/20/15, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks for your patience as we roll out this new bodhi version.
>>
>>
>> "This update has reached 3 days in testing and can be pushed to stable
>> now i
On Thu, 2015-08-20 at 12:33 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 08/20/2015 12:02 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >
> > To me any non fedora/redhat supplied account system is
> > inacceptable,
> >
> > This applies to github, sourceforge, farcebook, nitter, goggle, or
> > else - period.
>
> The l
On 08/20/2015 12:02 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
To me any non fedora/redhat supplied account system is inacceptable,
This applies to github, sourceforge, farcebook, nitter, goggle, or else -
period.
The last time a non-Fedora hosted / closed source service was suggested it was shot
down.
ht
On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 21:45 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> After a longer than expected outage window, I'm happy to report that
> bodhi2 is now live in production at
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates
> or
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/
I see in the thread that people s
On 08/20/2015 06:00 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 17:55:01 +0200
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
I share this view. I refuse to create a github account and do not
consider using any external account resources for Fedora to be
acceptable.
While I do have a GitHub accou
On 08/20/2015 06:05 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:02:44AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Are things like redhat bugzilla, koji and fedocal also slow?
Bugzilla is always slow, it's not a good reference ;-)
Definitely. But bodhi2 seemed worse :-)
What might have interfered
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:02:44AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> Are things like redhat bugzilla, koji and fedocal also slow?
Bugzilla is always slow, it's not a good reference ;-)
--
Tomasz TorczTo co nierealne -- tutaj jest normalne.
xmpp: zdzich...@chrome.pl
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 06:24:57 +0200
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 08/20/2015 06:08 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
> > On 8/20/15, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >> Thanks for your patience as we roll out this new bodhi version.
> >
> > "This update has reached 3 days in testing and can be pushed to
> > stable no
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 17:55:01 +0200
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > I share this view. I refuse to create a github account and do not
> > consider using any external account resources for Fedora to be
> > acceptable.
>
> While I do have a GitHub account (no way for me to eschew it
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> I share this view. I refuse to create a github account and do not
> consider using any external account resources for Fedora to be acceptable.
While I do have a GitHub account (no way for me to eschew it, sadly), I also
do not understand why (and am sad that) Bodhi develop
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> After a longer than expected outage window, I'm happy to report that
> bodhi2 is now live in production at
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates
> or
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/
Unfortunately, there are several things that have become worse:
* The front page is m
On Thu, 2015-08-20 at 11:00 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
> Looks like you need to hit "enter" after typing/pasting in the
> package NVR into the "Candidate Builds" field, which was not at all
> obvious to me.
Hi,
thanks for the hint. That made it work, the package name is repeated
below th
On 08/20/2015 12:00 PM, Paul Howarth wrote:
On 20/08/15 10:28, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 08/20/2015 09:51 AM, Milan Crha wrote:
On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 21:45 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
There will likely be oddities and bugs. Please file them in github so
we can prioritize them and get them fixed u
On 20/08/15 10:28, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 08/20/2015 09:51 AM, Milan Crha wrote:
On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 21:45 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
There will likely be oddities and bugs. Please file them in github so
we can prioritize them and get them fixed up.
https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/iss
On 08/20/2015 09:51 AM, Milan Crha wrote:
On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 21:45 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
There will likely be oddities and bugs. Please file them in github so
we can prioritize them and get them fixed up.
https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues
Hi,
I do not have a github a
On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 21:45 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> There will likely be oddities and bugs. Please file them in github so
> we can prioritize them and get them fixed up.
>
> https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues
Hi,
I do not have a github account, and I'm currently not going t
On 08/20/2015 06:08 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
On 8/20/15, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Thanks for your patience as we roll out this new bodhi version.
"This update has reached 3 days in testing and can be pushed to stable
now if the maintainer wishes"
"This update has reached 14 days in testing and
On 08/19/2015 10:45 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
There will likely be oddities and bugs. Please file them in github so
we can prioritize them and get them fixed up.
https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues
Beware: Editing an update with a newer build will wipe out the update.
Filed: https://gi
On 8/20/15, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Thanks for your patience as we roll out this new bodhi version.
"This update has reached 3 days in testing and can be pushed to stable
now if the maintainer wishes"
"This update has reached 14 days in testing and can be pushed to
stable now if the maintainer wish
78 matches
Mail list logo
