On Thu, 2015-08-20 at 12:33 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 08/20/2015 12:02 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > 
> > To me any non fedora/redhat supplied account system is 
> > inacceptable,
> > 
> > This applies to github, sourceforge, farcebook, nitter, goggle, or 
> > else - period.
> 
> The last time a non-Fedora hosted / closed source service was 
> suggested it was shot 
> down.
> 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-October/191012.h
> tml
> 
> Have times changed? Using github is acceptable?

(following on from previous mail) that specific link, though, is
talking about something completely different. That would be using the
non-free software *as part of infra*, not just hosting some open source
code we run in infra on a service that is not free.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Reply via email to