On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 23/08/15 16:36 -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >> Hi >> >> On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> >> No, sorry, but that is not true. I wrote those update notes in the Bodhi 1 >>> web interface, so of course I looked at the resulting formatting. Bodhi 1 >>> interpreted that syntax as a list, not as a single paragraph. This is a >>> change in Bodhi 2 (and IMHO, for the worse, though if there's some >>> official >>> Markdown spec that says it should be that way, meh…). >>> >> >> >> Markdown has no official spec. The closest you can get is commonmark. >> Fairly sure, the current parsing is more "correct". >> >> http://commonmark.org/ >> > > Some Markdown implementations require the blank line before the list > (StackOverflow's does), but CommonMark doesn't: > > In CommonMark, a list can interrupt a paragraph. That is, no blank > line is needed to separate a paragraph from a following list: > http://spec.commonmark.org/0.21/#example-246 > > So the current parsing doesn't match CommonMark. > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > The current parsing model seems to work the same way as most other Markdown enabled systems do (GitHub, BitBucket, Reddit, etc.), where an empty line is required just before a list or some other block to work. I always thought it was supposed to be that way, since it looks like that on Daring Fireball's spec <http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax.text>, too. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
