On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 13:13:04 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On 2012-08-31 12:32, john.flor...@dart.biz wrote:
> >> From: Kevin Fenzi
> >> I'd prefer to avoid a list... how about:
> > >
> > > "This site provides status only for services managed directly by
> > Fedora
> > > Infrastructure"
> >
On 2012-08-31 12:32, john.flor...@dart.biz wrote:
From: Kevin Fenzi
I'd prefer to avoid a list... how about:
>
> "This site provides status only for services managed directly by
Fedora
> Infrastructure"
That's short and simple and drives the point home clear enough, I
think.
I preferre
> From: Kevin Fenzi
> I'd prefer to avoid a list... how about:
>
> "This site provides status only for services managed directly by Fedora
> Infrastructure"
That's short and simple and drives the point home clear enough, I think.
--
John Florian
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject
On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 15:00:27 -0400
john.flor...@dart.biz wrote:
> > Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > We could add something to that effect perhaps.
> >
> > "We will not and cannot monitor the following Fedora-related
> > services: -Red Hat Bugzilla
> > -RPMFusion
> > -Fedora blogs
> > -Fedora news sites
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > We could add something to that effect perhaps.
>
> "We will not and cannot monitor the following Fedora-related services:
> -Red Hat Bugzilla
> -RPMFusion
> -Fedora blogs
> -Fedora news sites
> -Your Grandma's Fedora laptop"
Exactly! Great examples BTW and I really like
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> We could add something to that effect perhaps.
"We will not and cannot monitor the following Fedora-related services:
-Red Hat Bugzilla
-RPMFusion
-Fedora blogs
-Fedora news sites
-Your Grandma's Fedora laptop"
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admi
devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote on 08/31/2012 13:56:34:
> From: Kevin Fenzi
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Date: 08/31/2012 13:56
> Subject: Re: Fedora Infrastructure announces status.fedoraproject.org
> Sent by: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
>
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 12:51:22 -0500
> Jon Ciesla wrote:
>
>> > That makes lots of sense, but I suspect you'll get just as many
>> > "why isn't bugzilla shown here?" questions ... unless maybe the
>> > page had some hint that it only monitors s
On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 12:51:22 -0500
Jon Ciesla wrote:
> > That makes lots of sense, but I suspect you'll get just as many
> > "why isn't bugzilla shown here?" questions ... unless maybe the
> > page had some hint that it only monitors sites directly managed by
> > the Fedora Project, which is why
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 12:19 PM, wrote:
> devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote on 08/31/2012 12:46:31:
>
>> From: Kevin Fenzi
>> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Date: 08/31/2012 12:47
>> Subject: Re: Fedora Infrastructure announces status.fedoraproj
devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote on 08/31/2012 12:46:31:
> From: Kevin Fenzi
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Date: 08/31/2012 12:47
> Subject: Re: Fedora Infrastructure announces status.fedoraproject.org
> Sent by: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
>
On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 10:21:26 -0500
Jon Ciesla wrote:
> >> I might have missed something, but are there plans to add bugzilla
> >> to this?
> >
> > It was suggested, but we don't actually run bugzilla.redhat.com or
> > have anything to do with it. So it would be a bit difficult to try
> > and repo
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 09:43:03 -0500
> Jon Ciesla wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> > On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 09:45:49 +0100
>> > Peter Robinson wrote:
>> >
>> >> Looks really cool, congrats to all that made it ha
On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 09:43:03 -0500
Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 09:45:49 +0100
> > Peter Robinson wrote:
> >
> >> Looks really cool, congrats to all that made it happen!
> >>
> >> Will there be banners for when maintenance is go
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 09:45:49 +0100
> Peter Robinson wrote:
>
>> Looks really cool, congrats to all that made it happen!
>>
>> Will there be banners for when maintenance is going to happen/in
>> progress so that if there's an issue and we go th
On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 09:45:49 +0100
Peter Robinson wrote:
> Looks really cool, congrats to all that made it happen!
>
> Will there be banners for when maintenance is going to happen/in
> progress so that if there's an issue and we go there it will let us
> know if it's an unplanned outage or whet
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> I'm happy to announce the general availability of our
> status.fedoraproject.org site.
>
> This site provides an easy way for Fedora contributors and users to
> check on the status of services provided by Fedora Infrastructure.
>
On Aug 30, 2012 7:30 PM, "Kevin Fenzi" wrote:
> We really need to set a sunset date and retire smolt. I was hoping the
> new census project would be up and running before then, but we can't
> keep smolt really limping along forever.
Tomorrow. Ok that might be unreasonable. Make it Monday.
jo
On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 00:19:15 +0300
Alek Paunov wrote:
> Great, but the link under "Fedora Packages App" should be either
> undefined or https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/, not the
> current 404-pointing value of "UNKNOWN".
Fixed. Thanks.
> BTW, http://www.smolts.org/ returns 503 current
Great, but the link under "Fedora Packages App" should be either
undefined or https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/, not the current
404-pointing value of "UNKNOWN".
BTW, http://www.smolts.org/ returns 503 currently, but I do not know if
this is somehow related with "Everything seems to be
20 matches
Mail list logo
