devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote on 08/31/2012 13:56:34: > From: Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Date: 08/31/2012 13:56 > Subject: Re: Fedora Infrastructure announces status.fedoraproject.org > Sent by: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 12:51:22 -0500 > Jon Ciesla <limburg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > That makes lots of sense, but I suspect you'll get just as many > > > "why isn't bugzilla shown here?" questions ... unless maybe the > > > page had some hint that it only monitors sites directly managed by > > > the Fedora Project, which is why sites like bugzilla, etc., etc. > > > are not shown here. > > We could add something to that effect perhaps. > > Another issue is that we don't monitor bugzilla at all. With our other > services if something goes down, we are paged and the first thing the > person handling the outage can do is set the status. With no monitoring > we would depend on someone telling us when things are down and someone > who can update status being around to act on it. This would lead to > it's status being out of sync a great deal more than services we > monitor and manage. ;)
I'm not suggesting you monitor it at all, merely to have this page state that you don't. -- John Florian
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
