On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 13:13:04 -0700 Adam Williamson <awill...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 2012-08-31 12:32, john.flor...@dart.biz wrote: > >> From: Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> > >> I'd prefer to avoid a list... how about: > > > > > > "This site provides status only for services managed directly by > > Fedora > > > Infrastructure" > > > > That's short and simple and drives the point home clear enough, I > > think. > > I preferred the list. The thing is, you can't assume everyone knows > what is and isn't managed by Infrastructure. This would just change > the question from 'why isn't Bugzilla listed?' to 'why isn't Bugzilla > listed? isn't it maintained by infrastructure?' Then someone will ask about fedoraforum. Then someone will ask about fedora.ru Then someone will ask about the google+ fedora page... Then someone will ask about their Fedora mirrors... etc. The list could grow as long as the internet. ;) How about: This site is for the status of Fedora Infrastructure services. If you don't see a service here, it's not something we manage or provide status on. Contact that service for status information. kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
