On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 08:54:45AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore via devel wrote:
> Failed to resolve the transaction:
> Problem 1: installed package python3-qt5-webkit-5.15.10-11.fc41.x86_64
> requires python3-qt5(x86-64) = 5.15.10-11.fc41, but none of the
> providers can be installed
> - python3-qt5-5.
On Tue, 2025-03-04 at 16:24 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Do you want to make Fedora 42 better? Please spend 1 minute of your
> time and try to run:
>
> dnf --releasever=42 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno --
> best distro-sync
>
Failed to resolve the transaction:
Problem 1: i
Failed to resolve the transaction:
Problem 1: installed package python3-qt5-webkit-5.15.10-11.fc41.x86_64
requires python3-qt5(x86-64) = 5.15.10-11.fc41, but none of the
providers can be installed
- python3-qt5-5.15.10-11.fc41.x86_64 does not belong to a
distupgrade repository
- problem with in
On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 06:43:09PM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> Problem 6: package hyperscan-devel-5.4.1-8.fc42.x86_64 from fedora requires
> hyperscan(x86-64) = 5.4.1-8.fc42, but none of the providers can be installed
> - package vectorscan-5.4.11-9.fc42.x86_64 from fedora obsoletes hyperscan <
On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 06:43:09PM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> Problem 2: installed package kf5-kitinerary-23.08.5-3.fc41.x86_64 requires
> libpoppler.so.140()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> - installed package kf5-kitinerary-23.08.5-3.fc41.x86_64 requires
> libpoppler.so
The mesa-freeworld issue is probably caused by a bad mirror, 25.0.1 is present
in the base repo
https://ftp.icm.edu.pl/pub/Linux/dist/rpmfusion/free/fedora/development/42/Everything/x86_64/os/repoview/mesa-va-drivers-freeworld.html
As for steam, it's a known issue
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sh
I have checked the rpmfusion repo's for F42 and they are ready for beta release
$ sudo dnf repoclosure --check rpmfusion-free-updates-testing --check
rpmfusion-free --check rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-testing --check
rpmfusion-nonfree --newest
Updating and loading repositories:
Repositories load
On Tuesday, March 4, 2025 10:24:57 AM Eastern Daylight Time Miroslav Suchý
wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 42 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time
> and try to run:
>
> dnf --releasever=42 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno --best
> distro-sync
>
> This command does not replace `d
W dniu 4.03.2025 o 16:24, Miroslav Suchý pisze:
Do you want to make Fedora 42 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time
and try to run:
dnf --releasever=42 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno --best
distro-sync
This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal
pote
On Sat, 2025-03-08 at 11:46 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> torque
torque was retired and already don't have f42 branch , the build was
made before f42 branch on rawhide . At first glance the retirement of
the package seem that isn't complete
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
Miroslav Suchý kirjoitti 4.3.2025 klo 17.24:
Do you want to make Fedora 42 better? Please spend 1 minute of your
time and try to run:
dnf --releasever=42 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno --best
distro-sync
This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal
poten
On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 08:58:09AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 09:56:43AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 05. 03. 25 9:22, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > Hmm, this seems to be an unfinished retirement. We have
> > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/r
Good evening!
Aside from a handful of downgrades that already appear to be reported, my
primary system didn't encounter any issues with the transaction.
Transaction Summary:
Installing:68 packages
Upgrading: 4188 packages
Replacing: 4205 packages
Removing: 8 pack
Miroslav Suchý writes:
> Do you want to make Fedora 42 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run:
>
> dnf --releasever=42 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno --best distro-sync
I got a new (= not yet reported) failure:
Problem 1: installed package python3-qt5-webkit-5.15.
On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 09:56:43AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 05. 03. 25 9:22, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > Hmm, this seems to be an unfinished retirement. We have
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/torque/
> > c/5f8d64fc9a899f4b94e63685a29f4cc95ef2f829
> > but the package is tag
On 05. 03. 25 9:22, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Hmm, this seems to be an unfinished retirement. We have
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/torque/
c/5f8d64fc9a899f4b94e63685a29f4cc95ef2f829
but the package is tagged into rawhide.
But the package needs to be obsoleted anyway. I'll add it
On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 03:47:30PM -, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote:
> Tested on three machines running Fedora 41; two of them were a-okay, one had
> some errors:
>
> > Problem 1: installed package libreoffice-writer2latex-1.0.2-38.fc37.x86_64
> > requires osgi(javax.xml), but none of the prov
On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 11:24:53PM +0100, Charalampos Stratakis wrote:
> On my x86_64:
>
> Problem 1: installed package libreoffice-writer2latex-1.0.2-39.fc38.x86_64
> requires osgi(javax.xml), but none of the providers can be installed
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fedora-obsolete-packages/
Here's what im seeing
[sudo] password for ox:
Updating and loading repositories:
created by dnf config-manager from
https://repo.nordvpn.com//yum/nordvpn/centos/x86_64
100% | 6.4 KiB/s | 1.5 KiB | 00m00s
Unity Hub
I had the hsakmt-devel problem too, so I opened
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rocm-runtime/pull-request/11.
On Tue, Mar 4, 2025, at 2:54 PM, Przemek Klosowski via devel wrote:
> On 3/4/25 10:24 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>> Do you want to make Fedora 42 better? Please spend 1 minute of your t
On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 4:26 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 42 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time
> and try to run:
>
> dnf --releasever=42 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno --best
> distro-sync
>
> This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it
Do you want to make Fedora 42 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time
and try to run:
dnf --releasever=42 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno --best
distro-sync
I was surprised by 16 detected downgrades.
Downgrading: (Consecutive spaces are collapsed to avoid line wrap):
criu x86_
no issues here
Intel (RKL, 11 th. Gen.), running Gnome and Xorg
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/p
On 3/4/25 10:24 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Do you want to make Fedora 42 better? Please spend 1 minute of your
time and try to run:
dnf --releasever=42 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno --best
distro-sync
dnf --releasever=42 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno --best
distro-syn
I only found one issue and that is just due to me not using RPM fusion Repo
for nvidia drivers instead depending on negativo17s Nvidia drivers
Repositories loaded.
Failed to resolve the transaction:
Problem: installed package nvidia-driver-cuda-3:570.124.04-1.fc41.x86_64
requires nvidia-persistenc
here is mine:
no problem found here only protonvpn repo not available for fedora 42
and mysql-connector-odbc
[sudo] password for hhlp:
Updating and loading repositories:
keybase 100% | 36.8 KiB/s | 3.5 KiB | 00m00s
Hashicorp Stable - x86_64 ???% | 576.0 B/s | 314.0 B | 00m01s
>>> St
Tested on three machines running Fedora 41; two of them were a-okay, one had
some errors:
> Problem 1: installed package libreoffice-writer2latex-1.0.2-38.fc37.x86_64
> requires osgi(javax.xml), but none of the providers can be installed
> - xml-commons-apis-1.4.01-47.fc41.noarch does not belon
27 matches
Mail list logo
