Hey Richard,
It looks like this one is definitely not related to MATE as it
reportedly occurs in GNOME. I can't imagine gnome-software is the right
place for the bug to live, though. Could you try guessing a component
to move the issue to? udev, kernel, or fwupd, perhaps?
Michael
--
devel mailing
Hey Richard,
It looks like this one is definitely not related to MATE as it occurs
in GNOME. Could you try guessing a component to move the issue to?
udev, kernel, or fwupd, perhaps?
Michael
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists
s.
Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 18:06:09 +0100
Subject: Re: A Problem Regarding GNOME Software Maintenance
From: hughsi...@gmail.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Plus, I've been on annual PTO for the last 10 days. Its fair to say I basically
ignore MATE bugs (typically the bugs were fixed upst
Plus, I've been on annual PTO for the last 10 days. Its fair to say I
basically ignore MATE bugs (typically the bugs were fixed upstream in the
last two years, or the obsolete framework parts contribute to the
misbehavior...) so unless there's a stacktrace that looks interesting or a
lot of dupes i
Dne 9.5.2016 v 14:43 M.Hanny Sabbagh napsal(a):
> So what can I do furthermore about this?
> Thanks.
Although it can be painful for you, there is pretty high chance that it is not
priority for developer. Especially if it
cannot be reproduced on his own hardware.
Being pushy to maintainer is very
