Hi Zbigniew,
>>> Also, what is the relationship between
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BINUTILS230
>>> and
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BINUTILS231
>>
>> BINUTILS230 was the change request to bring in FSF binutils 2.30. This
>> is the version that is currently used in r
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 10:47:04AM +0100, Nick Clifton wrote:
> Hi Zbigniew,
>
> >> Do you foresee any significant issues with this version upgrade in the
> >> mass rebuild?
>
> No. I am currently testing the 2.31 sources on the FSF branch, but so far
> everything looks good.
>
> >> Anything
Hi Zbigniew,
>> Do you foresee any significant issues with this version upgrade in the
>> mass rebuild?
No. I am currently testing the 2.31 sources on the FSF branch, but so far
everything looks good.
>> Anything in particular that maintainers and upstreams
>> should looks at?
I hope not. T
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 09:12:35AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 05:16:31PM +0200, Jan Kurik wrote:
> > The linker can now put all code and read-only data sections into a
> > separate segment with only READ and EXECUTE permissions. All writable
> > data can be
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 05:16:31PM +0200, Jan Kurik wrote:
> The linker can now put all code and read-only data sections into a
> separate segment with only READ and EXECUTE permissions. All writable
> data can be placed into a separate segment with READ and WRITE
> permissions. This makes progra
= Proposed System Wide Change: Binutils 2.31 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BINUTILS231
Owner(s):
* Nick Clifton
Rebase the binutils package from version 2.30 to version 2.31.
== Detailed description ==
Switch the binutils package from being based on the 2.30 release of
the FSF
