Hi Zbigniew, >> Do you foresee any significant issues with this version upgrade in the >> mass rebuild?
No. I am currently testing the 2.31 sources on the FSF branch, but so far everything looks good. >> Anything in particular that maintainers and upstreams >> should looks at? I hope not. There have been problems in the past when rebasing the binutils, so I cannot guarantee that there will be no issues, but I will do my best to make sure that the change does not cause any problems, and that maintainers and upstreams do not even know that it has happened. > Also, what is the relationship between > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BINUTILS230 > and > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BINUTILS231 BINUTILS230 was the change request to bring in FSF binutils 2.30. This is the version that is currently used in rawhide. BINUTILS231 is the change request to bring in FSF binutils 2.31. The 2.31 release has not actually happened yet - it is scheduled for July 7 - but if it does happen in time then I would like to get it into rawhide before the mass rebuild happens. Then if there are any problems they should show up quickly. Cheers Nick _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/3REQAFASWKTQ7BHQFWDNMVKOTZKCAVAE/
