On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 10:47:04AM +0100, Nick Clifton wrote: > Hi Zbigniew, > > >> Do you foresee any significant issues with this version upgrade in the > >> mass rebuild? > > No. I am currently testing the 2.31 sources on the FSF branch, but so far > everything looks good. > > >> Anything in particular that maintainers and upstreams > >> should looks at? > > I hope not. There have been problems in the past when rebasing the binutils, > so I cannot guarantee that there will be no issues, but I will do my best to > make sure that the change does not cause any problems, and that maintainers > and upstreams do not even know that it has happened.
OK, good to hear that. > > Also, what is the relationship between > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BINUTILS230 > > and > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BINUTILS231 > > BINUTILS230 was the change request to bring in FSF binutils 2.30. This > is the version that is currently used in rawhide. > > BINUTILS231 is the change request to bring in FSF binutils 2.31. The > 2.31 release has not actually happened yet - it is scheduled for July 7 > - but if it does happen in time then I would like to get it into rawhide > before the mass rebuild happens. Then if there are any problems they > should show up quickly. But changes are specific to a Fedora release. If users see both changes in the release notes for F29 they will be justifiably confused. So I think BINUTILS230 should be automatically dropped (superseded) if BINUTILS231 makes it into F29. Zbyszek _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/TF6L6MNUQ4NIQVJEHZXF5GZKO6BRJNYJ/
