not install the best update candidate for package
hyperscan-5.4.1-6.fc41.x86_64
Everything else is multimedia related.
-Steve
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject
igger for such a change.
>
> This is separate topic. Anyway, based on what Steve wrote, the patch
> cannot be removed.
Right. But I see a possible minimal patch to fix it.
https://github.com/shadow-maint/shadow/blob/master/lib/audit_help.c#L59
This ^^^ function logs all audit events, I
On Friday, January 10, 2025 10:20:07 AM EST Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 01:08:38PM -0500, Steve Grubb wrote:
>
> > * Verify that audit events exist for user and group creation:
> >
> >ausearch --start recent -i -m
>
On Thursday, January 2, 2025 5:17:06 PM EST Björn Persson wrote:
> Steve Grubb wrote:
> > * Remove the package and verify audit events exist for account and group
> > deletion (see above ausearch command).
>
> I was under the impression that it's common practice to
gt; check that the output looks reasonable.
> * Verify that you can install the package and installed files have
> correct ownership.
* Verify that audit events exist for user and group creation:
ausearch --start recent -i -m
'ADD_USER,USER_MGMT,USER_CHAUTHTOK,ROLE_ASSIGN,ROL
Never mind...
export LC_ALL="C.UTF-8"
took care of the failure...
steved.
On 11/11/24 1:02 PM, Steve Dickson wrote:
On 11/10/24 11:56 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sat, Nov 09, 2024 at 12:07:09PM -0600, Steve Dickson wrote:
Hello,
Out of the blue rawhide scratch builds [1]
are n
On 11/10/24 11:56 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sat, Nov 09, 2024 at 12:07:09PM -0600, Steve Dickson wrote:
Hello,
Out of the blue rawhide scratch builds [1]
are now failing and f41 builds [2] are failing
but f40 builds [3] are succeeding and they
are all the same code!
Late Oct I made a
Hello,
Out of the blue rawhide scratch builds [1]
are now failing and f41 builds [2] are failing
but f40 builds [3] are succeeding and they
are all the same code!
Late Oct I made a release so their repo
heads are all the same.
Does anybody know what has changed in the building
process? Or bette
Hello Everyone!
I just pushed to rawhide an update for lxqt-wallet 4.0 that breaks abi
compatibility with items that use it.
In this case though, the packages depending on it have also been rebuilt
for it. But as it is tradition (And directed in Fedora's rules), I am
posting in the devel mailing
support this
conjecture , that this was "good advice" based on the understanding at the
time.
> it'd be helpful if the 'password manager' types engage in some dialog
> _first_ ...
>
> in any case, it's 'flagged' here, so I can at
ementation -- and explaining. for a client adding 1pass to their
> RH/Fedora desktop mix, that results unfortunately in support calls.
Propose it as a system wide change. I'd give it a +1. (Its what I made RHEL
do for security lockdowns.)
-Steve
> >> It'd be much cleaner if R
leaves
> deployments to RH/Fedora + 1password users in a pickle -- which vendor's
> guidance do you believe/trust? What *I* control, *I* can change. But it's
> an uphill push to say "Ignore Redhat" or "Ignore 1password" to others.
Changing one setting isn&#
Hello,
Not really here to defend the current setting. But I have run with it set to
1 for several years and have not noticed any real issues.
-Steve
On Monday, August 12, 2024 10:27:18 AM EDT pgnd wrote:
> in
>
> distro
> Name: Fedora Lin
On 7/23/24 5:04 PM, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 4:56 PM Steve Dickson wrote:
On 7/23/24 4:36 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 04:31:31PM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
Hello
I've got the following warning
RPM build war
On 7/23/24 4:36 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 04:31:31PM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
Hello
I've got the following warning
RPM build warnings:
source_date_epoch_from_changelog set but %changelog is missing
The spec file definitely has a %chan
Hello
I've got the following warning
RPM build warnings:
source_date_epoch_from_changelog set but %changelog is missing
The spec file definitely has a %changelog section.
What is it the warning about?
tia,
steved.
--
___
devel mailing list -- d
avoid the need to call pkg-config.
See the pkg-config man page for more details.
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ercgmY (%build)
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ercgmY (%build)
RPM build errors:
Child return code was: 1
On 6/29/24 19:48, Steve Dickson wrote:
Hello,
My
Hello,
My apologies if this has been already discussed, I
don't follow this email list as closely as I should so
please point to the previous discussion, if there is one.
I'm getting the following rawhide scratch build error [1]
which appears to be a mock build error [2] that is
not part of the
systemd --user.
Should "su -" also start it's own systemd instance since things seemingly
can't function without it?
By extension, what does this mean for sudo?
Why do 2 instances of keyboxd for that acct get started? (Should the second
one have gracefully exited?)
Or is this expec
What about simply blocking access to the git repos/koji/bodhi for those
without 2fa?
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 12:05 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 05:49:27PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2024-04-12 at 00:09 +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> > >
> > > What is the best w
We didnt withdraw it because, well to be completely honest, we are afraid
that, if we do that, in the eyes of the community at least, we will abandon
the idea completely and any subsequent effort would be undermined as a
result.
It’s kindof a case of « damned if you do and damned if you don’t »…
tasks such as software development, testing, quality
assurance, responding to bug reports, documentation, and support. IOW, it is
a process.
It is the community that carries out the process.
-Steve
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproj
I have definitely not read 75% of the comments and articles about the xz
issues but I understand the general reason why this happened.
Issue here is, let's say we do switch to an alternative, whatever it is.
Who's to say that one doesn't have the same basic issue? Same with any
other project in FO
s iOS" fights.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 8:34 AM Steve Cossette wrote:
> Problem with extensions is, while they are *technically* supported by
> gnome, they can break with any update (It has happened to me in the past).
> Heck, it kinda reminds me of hacks people use to get around the j
Problem with extensions is, while they are *technically* supported by
gnome, they can break with any update (It has happened to me in the past).
Heck, it kinda reminds me of hacks people use to get around the junk people
put in Windows 10/11...
On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 8:09 AM Leslie Satenstein via
ubuntu is Ubuntu. (Though,
I don't know about 'Kedora' as it has absolutely no meaning XD) Though I
feel like we should really only go this route if the other ideas get
completely exhausted...
Steve
On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 12:22 PM Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue,
Putting aside that i heard from Neal Gompa that anaconda cannot accommodate
a « multi-flavor » media, can you imagine how big that iso would be? Forget
4gb, it’d probably be closer to 20gb!
On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 09:49 Leslie Satenstein via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Perhaps
It is not an april fools joke.
On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 04:37 Peter Boy wrote:
>
>
> > Am 02.04.2024 um 22:06 schrieb Steve Cossette :
> >
> > ... The overall spirit of the CP is that we think KDE, and to some
> extent the other spins too, need a bit mor
Sorry, that's pretty much how things are right now, is that what you were
trying to demonstrate?
I'm not really following.
Personally, if we were to promote both KDE and Gnome on the website, I'd
make it dead simple. I really suck at making graphics so I'll try to put it
in text:
I imagine a pag
Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 04:06:45PM -0400, Steve Cossette wrote:
> > Alright, so a substantial amount of information changed since the
> original
> > submission of the change proposal. We aren't necessarily thinking of
> > demoting Gnome. The overall spir
Oooo I could go for some Yak meat!
On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 5:32 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-04-02 at 17:37 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote:
> >
> > I am a happy KDE user, since the good old days of version 1.0. I
> celebrate
> > this decision! My recognition goes to the enormous and susta
3:58 PM Steven A. Falco
wrote:
> On 4/2/24 03:50 PM, Steve Cossette wrote:
> > Well, we did submit this yesterday around 2:30-3:00PM EST, guessing it
> was a bit too late.
> >
> > But the proposal is 1000% serious.
>
> I'm glad to hear you say that, as I
Hello Matthew, and welcome to Fedora!
You'll find alot of good people in here eager to help you. Feel free to
also drop in on matrix for a more real-time conversation!
On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 3:44 PM Matthew Kosarek via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> My name is Mat
I personally would very much agree with enforcing the use of 2fa on the
Fedora Account System. Maybe take that opportunity to make it a bit more
user friendly? (Such as the fkinit prompt requiring the 2fa code being
added at the end of your password -- to be clear I think the 2fa code
should be sep
Well, we did submit this yesterday around 2:30-3:00PM EST, guessing it was
a bit too late.
But the proposal is 1000% serious.
On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 3:46 PM Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 at 19:44, Richard Hughes wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 at 10:40, Aoife Moloney wrote:
>
ode.
> >
> > Is there a way to tell rpmbuild not to worry about this?
>
> The solution should be simple - remove stray +x permissions from all *.rs
> files.
Thanks. That did it.
-Steve
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedora
e first line because it's vendored
code.
Is there a way to tell rpmbuild not to worry about this?
-Steve
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
I
On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 9:51 PM Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-02-08 at 20:43 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 12:33 PM Sérgio Basto
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2024-02-07 at 16:03 +0100, Marc Deop i Argemí wrote:
> > > > We are not banning nor deleting anything.
On 2024-02-06 8:20 a.m., Roberto Ragusa wrote:
On 2/3/24 22:11, pgnd wrote:
Is there a way to see what gaps remain, which ones are being worked
on, and which ones
will be declared "not a gap - won't fix"?
I have a list of things I'm tracking. I've been reluctant to publish
it because people
On 2024-02-07 7:21 a.m., Peter Boy wrote:
I don't really want to get involved in this discussion. I don't use KDE, I
don't even use Fedora Desktop anymore. But there is one argument resp. strategy
that triggers me:
Am 07.02.2024 um 10:44 schrieb Michel Lind :
- KDE SIG likely also want peop
That’s just kmail though. I have a similar issue, but kmail is just plain
broken in plasma 6 right now.
On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 11:08 PM Garry T. Williams
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 30 January 2024 08:07:25 EST Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 12:47:44PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On 2024-02-03 9:01 a.m., Björn Persson wrote:
Neal Gompa wrote:
It's extremely obvious that people want to use it.
It's extremely obvious that *some* people want to use Wayland. It's
equally obvious that some other people want to use X. It's also obvious
that certain people want to make *everyb
Welcome to Fedora!
Drop by matrix, we don't bite (hard)!
Le jeu. 1 févr. 2024, à 19 h 48, Leo Sandoval a
écrit :
> Dear Fedora Community!
>
> My name is Leonardo Sandoval, a software developer living in Guadalajara,
> Mexico. I have been in the industry since 2006, most of the time close to
> t
On 2024-02-01 11:21 a.m., Roberto Ragusa wrote:
On 2/1/24 14:29, Steve Cossette wrote:
And yes, that /is/ the whole point: We want to foster the use of
Wayland, to increase it's adoption, to force people using it to hit
snags along the road and fill tickets so those issues can be
On 2024-02-01 10:27 a.m., Peter Boy wrote:
Sorry, a bit off-topic here, but nevertheless:
Am 01.02.2024 um 15:14 schrieb Steve Cossette :
Hello Pgnd,
I honestly do appreciate your point of view. Especially from a
business owner standpoint. I do manage small business servers, and I
feel
On 2024-01-30 8:04 a.m., Germano Massullo wrote:
What does it mean that FESCo is applying an injunction?
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Condu
On 2024-02-01 8:18 a.m., Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Thu, 2024-02-01 at 07:08 -0500, Steve Cossette wrote:
So, if you all don't mind, I'd like to steer this discussion in a
slightly different way:
What is the definition of a Fedora Change Proposal?
Proposal was not accepted by many memb
So, if you all don't mind, I'd like to steer this discussion in a slightly
different way:
What *is* the definition of a Fedora Change Proposal?
I was under the impression it was an announcement of intent by the
maintainers of a specific subset of the fedora project to "change"
something. Once sai
sts.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
That about sums it up, yes.
By the way, my name is Steve Cossette and I'm also one of the members of
the KDE SiG. If the packages are accepted under the sole condition that
it does
On 1/23/24 10:13 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 23. 01. 24 16:08, Steve Dickson wrote:
Hello,
I had to change my /etc/krb5.conf do to
some realm changes... and now when I
to a kinit to FEDORAPROJECT.ORG it
hangs for a while then errors with
kinit: Cannot contact any KDC for realm
On 1/23/24 10:08 AM, Steve Dickson wrote:
Hello,
I had to change my /etc/krb5.conf do to
some realm changes... and now when I
to a kinit to FEDORAPROJECT.ORG it
hangs for a while then errors with
kinit: Cannot contact any KDC for realm 'FEDORAPROJECT.ORG' while
getting initial c
Hello,
I had to change my /etc/krb5.conf do to
some realm changes... and now when I
to a kinit to FEDORAPROJECT.ORG it
hangs for a while then errors with
kinit: Cannot contact any KDC for realm 'FEDORAPROJECT.ORG' while
getting initial credentials
My question is, what has to be in the /etc/k
ystem-preset/90-default.preset and it seems to work as expected.
Would this update require just a FESCO ticket asking for the preset or does
this need both a FESCO ticket and a self-contained change notice?
Thanks,
-Steve
--
___
devel mailing list --
On Monday, December 18, 2023 1:40:55 PM EST Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Dec 2023 at 18:18, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I wanted to ask about the right tactic to make a change in Fedora 40.
> > Libcap-
> > ng is ready for a new release. I want t
_apply function declaration. This was to increase visibility to anyone
doing builds.
So, what should I do to remove the patch? Do I push the new release into
rawhide without the patch or does this need to go through the Fedora Change
Process? And if so, self-contained or system wide?
On Monday, December 11, 2023 4:59:45 AM EST Tim Flink wrote:
> On 12/8/23 08:34, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > On Friday, December 8, 2023 12:41:59 AM EST Jun Aruga (he / him) wrote:
> >
> >> Congratulations for the PyTorch package!
> >> https://src.fedoraproject.org/r
On Friday, December 8, 2023 11:57:55 AM EST Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-12-08 at 11:49 -0500, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > On Friday, December 8, 2023 11:23:29 AM EST Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> >
> > > But yeah, there'll always be a f
adjusted
using the standards.
-Steve
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-co
itch. This is a positive step and I would love to switch one day.
Best Regards,
-Steve
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://doc
tream should put all of these in the right places so that you do
not pass them this way.
-Steve
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
htt
On 11/18/23 12:39 PM, Dan Horák wrote:
On Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:30:04 -0500
Steve Dickson wrote:
Hello,
When building an nfs-utils rpm in rawhide
I get the following errors:
xml.c: In function ‘junction_parse_xml_buf’:
xml.c:293:15: error: implicit declaration of function ‘xmlParseMemory
Hello,
When building an nfs-utils rpm in rawhide
I get the following errors:
xml.c: In function ‘junction_parse_xml_buf’:
xml.c:293:15: error: implicit declaration of function ‘xmlParseMemory’
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
293 | tmp = xmlParseMemory(buf, (int)len);
|
being
enforced, that will get the attention of the security team.
And while we are talking update security, minimum hash sizes since last year
are SHA384 and signatures being RSA 3072 and higher (this includes secure
boot). There is also an expectation of moving away from RSA to quantum
resista
On 10/25/23 12:20 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2023-10-25 at 12:03 -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
Hello,
This update failed [1] due to a system timeout [2]
not a test failure... Is there some way to override
or wave the failure.
Failed tests are automatically retried one time. However
Hello,
This update failed [1] due to a system timeout [2]
not a test failure... Is there some way to override
or wave the failure.
tia,
steved.
[1] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-ed0c57b4ba
[2] https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/2225991#
__
eft it to the admin.
Not that you have to do it this way. But I thought I'd mention how we
navigated changes in the past. The main thing is we didn't want people
getting locked out by an incompatible change in the pam stack. (Especially
for remote logins.)
-Steve
> An automation pro
for audit logs can avoid installing the audit package.
This will need extra eyes - hence it will go through the Change Proposal
process to ensure it works well.
So, if this is in the context of F40, it may warrant another look at the
plans.
-Steve
__
d, it connects via the socket API where the sshd
instances is started with the right SE Linux labels. This is a small but
important use case.
I suppose the fallback would be to go back to using xinetd if this is not
fixed in systemd.
-Steve
___
deve
gs so they can be fixed:
https://github.com/stevegrubb/fsfuzzer
It does not support all filesystems, but it is easy to add support through
adding the correct mounter to the scrips. It has found *so* *many* filesystem
bugs over time.
-Steve
___
deve
On 7/20/23 2:09 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
On Thu, 2023-07-20 at 13:59 -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
This bz[1] was opened on one of my packages not building on f39.
I did a quick rawhide scratch build and sure enough
the build fails with [2]
The important part is earlier in the log
Hello,
This bz[1] was opened on one of my packages not building on f39.
I did a quick rawhide scratch build and sure enough
the build fails with [2]
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
"/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/mockbuild/trace_decorator.py", line
93, in trace
result = func(
On Wednesday, June 28, 2023 10:15:48 AM EDT Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Di, 27.06.23 12:04, Panu Matilainen (pmati...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > On 6/22/23 19:55, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Adopting_sysusers.d_format
> > >
>
nce in functionality between the two
> variants of passwd?
Yes, there is at least one difference that I know of. The one from passwd is
SELinux aware. I think that the threat it is defending against is root being
a shared account. You can have web admin, db admin, security officer, and
s the new normal.
-Steve
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelin
On Thursday, June 22, 2023 2:14:22 PM EDT Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 7:57 PM Steve Grubb wrote:
> > I have switched to F38 and find a couple items annoying. I have a
> > workflow that checks things I develop out of github, rolls it up into
> > an rpm, bu
, now its gone (problem #1). OK, I use rpmbuild -bc to rebuild it. I
cd into the build directory make a change and run make.
gcc: fatal error: environment variable 'RPM_ARCH' not defined
(problem #2)
How do I fix these things?
-Steve
__
at switch. I also
have not audited the code in shadow-utils version of passwd where the one we
are using now has been audited several times.
-Steve
> == Feedback ==
>
>
> == Benefit to Fedora ==
>
> The main benefit is to decrease the maintenance and packaging work on
&
saw the
deprecation email) has 55 places where it sends audit events managing
accounts.
There is a 10 year old (or more) standard published here:
https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-documentation/wiki/SPEC-User-Account-Lifecycle-Events
If %pre getent, useradd, and groupadd are being replaced by so
the root of trust? Are they signed by a Fedora key that I already
have? How can we verify it's integrity? Once installed, how do I verify it's
integrity? How do I check if anything has been modified? Does it integrate
well with SE Linux, IMA, fapolicyd, or openscap? O
On Tuesday, May 30, 2023 10:00:53 PM EDT Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Fri, May 26, 2023, at 10:20 AM, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > sbattach --detach signature /boot/efi/EFI/BOOT/BOOTX64.EFI
> > openssl pkcs7 -inform DER -in signature -text -print_certs >
> > shim-certs.txt>
&
On Friday, May 26, 2023 11:18:32 AM EDT Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 2:20 PM Steve Grubb wrote:
> > I was poking around a F38 system to look over the Secure Boot
> > certificates and found something that may warrant attention.
>
> I *suspect* this is
to be compliant with CNSA 1.0 requirements? And if so, that also means
moving to SHA-384. Or did I miss some system-upgrade step that updates the
bootloader?
TBH, I am surprised by this finding. But we're all busy and it *is* working.
Best,
-Steve
___
de
Hello,
I'm getting a very strange mock error [1] on a package [2]
that was recently ported to python 3.
The package builds fine locally... only fails in a
scratch build... and that function that the error is c
complaining about does not exist in the package...
Not clear what to do... tia!
stev
allowed as is ECDH P-512, and AES-256.
Then in 2025, this all starts again with CNSA 2.0 where there's a transition
period to quantum resistant algorithms. The target is everything transitioned
by 2030.
-Steve
___
devel mailing list -- devel@l
Good morning all,
I had a strange experience with Timeshift last week. For those that don't know,
Timeshift is a software that allows you to make a backup of your system (As a
snapshot) and restore it in case you need to.
I installed it a couple weeks ago and made a backup. I couldn't make a bt
Hello,
I'm trying to access kernel.org with kup
script but it does not seem to be in Fedora 37.
The only rpm I can find is kup-0.3.6-11.fc36.rpm.
What am I missing??
steved.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send
On 2/28/23 12:37 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
February is abbreviated as "Fed" in the first changelog entry:
* Tue Fed 28 2023 Steve Dickson 1.2.6-4.rc2
- Updated to latest upstream RC release: rpcbind-1_2_7-rc2
Yup! That was the problem... Thank you for your time!!!
steved.
On T
On 2/28/23 12:37 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 28. 02. 23 18:33, Steve Dickson wrote:
On 2/28/23 12:12 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 28. 02. 23 17:43, Steve Dickson wrote:
Hello,
I'm getting this warning
RPM build warnings:
source_date_epoch_from_changelog set but %changelog is mi
On 2/28/23 12:12 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 28. 02. 23 17:43, Steve Dickson wrote:
Hello,
I'm getting this warning
RPM build warnings:
source_date_epoch_from_changelog set but %changelog is missing
But the %changelog is not missing...
Any ideas?
Could you please share the spec
Hello,
I'm getting this warning
RPM build warnings:
source_date_epoch_from_changelog set but %changelog is missing
But the %changelog is not missing...
Any ideas?
tia,
steved.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscri
I just tried on a second PC, and I see this too on this one:
Lmodx86_64 8.7.18-1.fc38
fedora258 k
Seems Lmod is of a lower version on Fedora 38 as well, compared to Fedora
37.
Le mer. 22 févr. 2023, à 04 h 30, Miroslav Suchý
Same here, lower version numbers for the following packages:
Downgrading:
fwupd x86_64 1.8.10-1.fc38 fedora
1.8 M
fwupd-plugin-flashrom x86_64 1.8.10-1.fc38 fedora
26 k
fwupd-plugin-modem-manager x86_64 1.8.10-1.fc38
Yeah I'd say +1 from here too. Was just wondering about this yesterday.
Le mer. 22 févr. 2023, 05 h 52, Kamil Paral a écrit :
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 9:48 PM Matthew Miller
> wrote:
>
>> But, I think it's time to move on. We have ostree and various
>> container-delta approaches. We should foc
Welcome! I'm a newer packager myself, it's a nice thing to know you are
contributing to a project such as fedora!
Enjoy!
Le jeu. 26 janv. 2023, à 16 h 45, Michel Alexandre Salim <
mic...@michel-slm.name> a écrit :
> Hi Neil,
>
> On Thu, 2023-01-26 at 16:34 -0500, Neil Hanlon wrote:
> > Hi folks!
Same here. To be honest, most older games still use 32-bit binaries (even
some more recent ones). That's one of the reasons why Windows will prolly
never remove WoW64. Or at least for an extremely long time still.
Le lun. 16 janv. 2023, 18 h 13, Arthur Bols a écrit :
> On 17/03/2022 10:49, Matyá
Hello,
On Friday, January 6, 2023 10:10:21 AM EST Steve Grubb wrote:
> One approach to solving this is to use selinux policy. I was informed
> overnight that policy 38.2-1 should now enforce kernel transitions to
> specific helper applications. So, maybe this is solved well enough?
I c
Hello,
On Friday, January 6, 2023 9:33:12 AM EST Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Do, 05.01.23 20:17, Steve Grubb (sgr...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > I work on RHEL security problems. I have been looking into a number of
> > exploits and I think we have a problem that has an easy
Hello,
I want to add some missing information...
On Thursday, January 5, 2023 8:43:34 PM EST Ian Kent wrote:
> On 6/1/23 09:17, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > I work on RHEL security problems. I have been looking into a number of
> > exploits and I think we have a problem that has an eas
de change? Who could help make this happen if approved?
Thanks,
-Steve
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org
On Friday, December 23, 2022 1:34:48 PM EST Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 7:21 PM Steve Grubb wrote:
> > This is nice, but all I ever seen is a black screen and a spinning
> > circle. No text of any kind. If something were written to the console,
> &
1 - 100 of 673 matches
Mail list logo
