On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 at 17:02, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > #1957 F29 Change: Liberation Fonts 2
> > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1957
> > DECISION (+6, 0, 0)
>
> Sigh!
>
> Really nothing has changed since the decision in Fedora 19 to stick with
> Liberation 1, onl
On 20 June 2017 at 22:37, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 06:46:31PM +0530, pravin....@gmail.com wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 06:35:24PM +0530, pravin....@gmail.com wrote:
> > > >- In Fedora we will have both packages liberation2-fonts and
>
On 20 June 2017 at 18:42, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 06:35:24PM +0530, pravin....@gmail.com wrote:
> >- In Fedora we will have both packages liberation2-fonts and
> >liberation-fonts
>
> Will the actual fonts have different names?
>
I am pla
Hi All,
Presently as you know, we have liberation-2 and liberation 1.07.4. i am
maintaining both in single git repo. [1]
I am thinking to create different project for liberation2, reasons as
follows
- liberation 2 - It initially forked from google-croscore-fonts and now
independent
On 12 January 2017 at 14:33, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 12/01/17 06:59, pravin....@gmail.com wrote:
>
> On 10 January 2017 at 14:39, Tom Hughes > <mailto:t...@compton.nu>> wrote:
>>
>> I don't really understand the logic here...
>>
>>
On 10 January 2017 at 16:31, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <
domi...@greysector.net> wrote:
> On Tuesday, 10 January 2017 at 09:39, Jan Kurik wrote:
> > = Proposed Self Contained Change: Transdiff =
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Transdiff
> >
> > Change owner(s):
> > *Sundeep Anand
On 10 January 2017 at 14:39, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 10/01/17 08:39, Jan Kurik wrote:
>
> Often even after 100% translation in Zanata, few packages do not get
>> build with latest translations in Fedora. This result in poor
>> localization experience.
>>
>
> I don't really understand the logic her
On 11 July 2016 at 16:55, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > On 07/08/16 20:41, Bastien Nocera-san wrote:
> > > I think that the emoji input method should be a separate input method,
> so
> > > that most users would have the choice between inputting using the
> keyboard
missed this email :(
On 5 July 2016 at 23:19, Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
> Is there any point in updating fonts in rawhide to their Unicode 9.0
> versions, before the change is implemented?
>
With Unicode 9.0 update libraries will be updated with latest UCD stuff.
>
> Besides the font checki
Hi all,
Bringing this topic from meeting discussion to mailing list for
wider audience.
Often after completion of translation package get updated with more
string or sometime translated .po file does not get pulled while
building package. This causes L10N string breakage.
Anaconda is maj
On 19 March 2015 at 08:57, Akira TAGOH wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have a test day event for Internationalization on f22 as usual to make
> sure if f22 has any issues around i18n.
> Please join Freenode #fedora-test-day and try if your primary language
> works on f22 when you have a bit of time.
> Test c
On 16 October 2014 15:14, Richard Hughes wrote:
> If you maintain a font in Fedora, or are a provenpackager, I could
> really need your help this weekend. Basically, we want to implement
> AppStream metadata[1] for all the fonts we want to show in the
> software center. I've already made a good s
On 16 October 2014 15:14, Richard Hughes wrote:
> If you maintain a font in Fedora, or are a provenpackager, I could
> really need your help this weekend. Basically, we want to implement
> AppStream metadata[1] for all the fonts we want to show in the
> software center. I've already made a good s
cc'ing to devel list as well.
On 29 May 2014 11:26, pravin@gmail.com wrote:
> Glad to see this happening after long time.
>
>
> On 29 May 2014 10:25, Parag Nemade wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> It took some time but finally we have a working
>> system-config-l
On 11 March 2014 19:25, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>
> Le Jeu 6 mars 2014 05:28, pravin@gmail.com a écrit :
>
> > Valid point.
> > I will fix this by adding fontconfig Aliases. We can keep it for couple
> of
> > releases.
>
> It costs little to keep them f
Regards,
Pravin Satpute
On 6 March 2014 10:00, pravin@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> On 6 March 2014 09:26, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
>> Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>>
>> > = Proposed Self Contained Change: Lohit Odia Gurumukhi font naming =
>> > https://fedora
On 6 March 2014 09:26, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>
> > = Proposed Self Contained Change: Lohit Odia Gurumukhi font naming =
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Lohit_Odia_Gurumukhi
> >
> > Change owner(s): Pravin Satpute
>
> According to:
>
> http://snehakore.blogspot.
On 5 March 2014 16:51, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> 2014-03-05 9:17 GMT+01:00 pravin....@gmail.com :
>
>> On 4 March 2014 19:12, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>>
>>> Formally, the process calls for either making this a system-wide change,
>>> or for making the anaconda a
On 4 March 2014 19:12, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> Hello,
> 2014-03-03 15:31 GMT+01:00 Jaroslav Reznik :
>
> = Proposed Self Contained Change: Lohit Odia Gurumukhi font naming =
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Lohit_Odia_Gurumukhi
>>
>
>
> This
>
>> Other developers: N/A (not a System Wid
On 24 January 2014 17:52, Nilamdyuti Goswami wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> While translating some of the fedora packages we often come across some
> source strings whose context or meaning is not clear. This results in wrong
> translations which is discovered later while using the actual application.
> Th
On 10 October 2013 14:19, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> I see that recently chromium appears to have commissioned two fonts
> claimed to be metrically equivalent to Calibri and Cambria. Which is
> super great from the perspective of giving LibreOffice a decent shot at
> laying out Microsoft Office doc
On 27 August 2013 14:04, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>
> Le Mar 27 août 2013 06:34, pravin@gmail.com a écrit :
>
> > Yeah.
> > If someone does specific request for SMP we should go ahead with it. At
> > the
> > end of days it is going to take only some kb's sp
On 27 August 2013 00:57, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> pravin....@gmail.com (pravin....@gmail.com) said:
> > > Recently i done packaging of google-noto-fonts [1] for Fedora. With
> this
> > > font we got number of new script fonts of Unicode which were not
>
Added devel list proper email id.
Regards,
Pravin S
On 26 August 2013 17:15, pravin@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Recently i done packaging of google-noto-fonts [1] for Fedora. With this
> font we got number of new script fonts of Unicode which were not available
> earlier.
On 11 July 2012 18:55, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>
> > On 07/11/2012 02:58 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> >> On 07/11/2012 08:51 AM, pravin@gmail.com wrote:
> >>> I have completed initial work. Yet not able to solve
> >>> LiberationSansNarrow
> >&g
On 21 May 2012 11:53, pravin@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Most of you aware regarding liberation license problem we are facing
> from long time. Looks like time came when we can get rid of it.
>
> Google has recently released google-croscore fonts.
> - These
On 21 May 2012 23:08, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>
> Le Lun 21 mai 2012 08:23, pravin@gmail.com a écrit :
>
> > - Use base of croscore fonts and apply enhancements available in
> > liberation and call new entity liberation 2.0
>
> That would be great !
>
>
Hi All,
Most of you aware regarding liberation license problem we are facing from
long time. Looks like time came when we can get rid of it.
Google has recently released google-croscore fonts.
- These are from same vendor ascendar with OFL license and more glyph
coverage than existing lib
28 matches
Mail list logo
