st away ye EPEL10 users :)
--
Jonathan Wright
AlmaLinux OS Foundation
Mattermost: chat <https://chat.almalinux.org/almalinux/messages/@jonathan>
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an e
help with this. Do note it requires
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xdg-desktop-portal-hyprland/pull-request/1
being merged.
Copying @nig...@nighti.dev as the maintainer of
xdg-desktop-portal-hyprland
Thanks to @Marek Blaha for helping coordinate this.
--
Jonathan Wright
AlmaLin
On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 at 22:44, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2025-02-11 at 21:45 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Jan 2025 at 09:07, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 07:31:35PM +, Sérgio Basto via devel
> > > w
On Tue, 28 Jan 2025 at 09:07, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 07:31:35PM +, Sérgio Basto via devel wrote:
> > I just want check, if I'm thinking correctly before submitting a fix in
> > gtest package
> >
> > The problem is on Rawhide I have this warning that make other package
On Mon, 3 Feb 2025 at 21:22, Michael J Gruber wrote:
>
> So, over at upstream they raised the suspicion that some parts of what
> I'm linking are compiled with different flags. To recap: I get
> ```
> /usr/include/c++/15/bits/stl_vector.h:1262: std::vector<_Tp,
> _Alloc>::reference std::vector<_Tp
Hey everyone,
Naev now has a new dependency on lyaml which is not yet in Fedora. I
don't really play the game anymore, so I'm orphaning it. There are two
packages, naev (the game) and naev-data (the game data files). If
anyone's interested, go ahead and grab it!
Th
etc. Yet, I have started to get these e-mails; but
> this is a one-way street, I can “hear” what you are doing, but you cannot
> “hear” me…if you know what I mean.
>
>
>
> Please advise as to what kind of account/membership I need and/or which
> e-mail to send questions/re
ma.
https://github.com/valkey-io/valkey/releases/tag/8.0.2
--
Jonathan Wright
AlmaLinux Foundation
Mattermost: chat <https://chat.almalinux.org/almalinux/messages/@jonathan>
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
lunasvg is getting a soname bump but nothing depends on this package.
License was also changed from MIT AND FTL to just MIT
--
Jonathan Wright
AlmaLinux Foundation
Mattermost: chat <https://chat.almalinux.org/almalinux/messages/@jonathan>
--
___
ode of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
>
st_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
--
Jonathan Wright
AlmaLinux Foundation
Mattermost: chat <
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: http
On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 5:04 PM Jonathan Steffan
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 2:21 PM Yaakov Selkowitz
> wrote:
>
>> Could anyone please help fix python-twisted?
>
>
> Doing a quick upgrade and dropping all current patches shows we are
> missing new dependenci
ndencies. I'll work on this a bit more and see how much work it'll
be after adding the missing dependencies.
--
Jonathan Steffan
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists
oject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructur
On Tue, 23 Jul 2024 at 16:32, Joe Orton wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 10:54:12AM +0200, Clemens Lang wrote:
> > However, we should still consider the effect this will have on
> > developers that build software on Fedora — they will also have to
> > specify -DOPENSSL_NO_ENGINE now or see failin
Hi!
Could someone please review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053822? Happy to review
your package in return!
--
Jonathan
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le
st Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
--
Jonathan Wright
AlmaLinux Foundation
Mattermost: chat <https://chat.almalinux.org/almalin
Is there still any work being done on this? I'm interested in running
Fedora on LoongArch and helping with the porting efforts. I do have
hardware as well (it's available on AliExpress, even outside of China).
--
Jonathan
--
___
devel ma
On Fri, 19 Jul 2024 at 17:13, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On Fri, 19 Jul 2024 at 15:52, Clemens Lang wrote:
> >
> > Hi Jonathan,
> >
> > > On 19. Jul 2024, at 16:28, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 19 Jul 2024 at 15:21, Jonathan Wakel
On Fri, 19 Jul 2024 at 15:52, Clemens Lang wrote:
>
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> > On 19. Jul 2024, at 16:28, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 19 Jul 2024 at 15:21, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >>
> >> Agreed. Boost Asio will use openssl engine if the use
On Fri, 19 Jul 2024 at 15:31, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 03:28:20PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > On Fri, 19 Jul 2024 at 15:21, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 19 Jul 2024 at 12:29, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > >
On Fri, 19 Jul 2024 at 15:28, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On Fri, 19 Jul 2024 at 15:21, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 19 Jul 2024 at 12:29, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 12:06:21PM +0100, Richard W.M
On Fri, 19 Jul 2024 at 15:21, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On Fri, 19 Jul 2024 at 12:29, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 12:06:21PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > Zbigniew (correctly) added this patch to nbdk
On Tue, 2 Jul 2024 at 13:17, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, 2 Jul 2024 at 14:07, Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote:
>>
>> Dear colleagues,
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 2, 2024 at 1:35 PM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This recent commit [1] in rawhide moves the engine API to a
>>> openssl-devel-engine sub
On Fri, 19 Jul 2024 at 12:29, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 12:06:21PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > Zbigniew (correctly) added this patch to nbdkit:
> >
> >
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nbdkit/c/6b18b74749efbe1f618ea4bc010b56277157b0ac?branch=r
rnel.org
>
> --
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>
I'm pushing an update to chafa to 1.14.1 in rawhide which includes a soname
bump.
The only thing that uses it is fastfetch which is my package so I'll
rebuild it with it.
--
Jonathan Wright
AlmaLinux Foundation
Mattermost: chat <https://chat.almalinux.org/almalinux/messa
I've bumped simple-mail to version 3.0.0 which includes a soname bump, or
rather a soname rename in rawhide.
It doesn't look like anything currently uses this lib.
--
Jonathan Wright
AlmaLinux Foundation
Mattermost: chat <https://chat.almalinux.org/almalinux/messa
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 12:33 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 19/06/2024 19:45, Jonathan Steffan wrote:
> > Unless the private key is off-system, anything will be able to be loaded
> > without much fuss.
>
> Maybe akmods can be
ke a reasonable approach without compromising UEFI Secure Boot
usefulness.
--
Jonathan Steffan
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
http
se kmodgenca with akmods.
>
> The second option is better, IMO.
While it does *feel* better, both options effectively remove any UEFI
Secure boot protections.
Unless the private key is off-system, anything will be able to be loaded
without much fuss.
--
Jonathan Steffan
--
___
ant to switch to?
>
> (If there's a clear answer, we'll want to finalize the rubberstamping
> of the Change Proposal. If not, we can let it sit some more.)
>
> Zbyszek
>
--
Jonathan Wright
AlmaLinux Foundation
Mattermost: chat <https://chat.almalinux.org/almalinux/mes
Welcome to Fedora!
On Sat, May 25, 2024, 09:37 Jose Fernandez wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm Jose. I work at Netflix on the Compute Runtime team. We manage the
> multi-tenant container runtime and the base OS (Ubuntu-based). My expertise
> is in observability, performance, and reliability. My curren
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>>> Do not reply to spam, report it:
>>>> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Aoife Moloney
>>>
I noticed the same.
On Sun, May 19, 2024, 20:03 Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 1:06 AM Aoife Moloney wrote:
> >
> […]
> > and dont forget to claim your Fedora badge too!
>
> That last bit doesn't seem to be working. Was the "Claim your I Voted
> badge." link a
Kenneth,
You might be looking for the forge macros:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/SourceURL/#_using_forges_hosted_revision_control
--
Jonathan Steffan
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
The key, on the
> other hand, won't likely change, and if there is a change, it is good to
> detect it. Are you sure you don't want to make the signature also a url
> source so it is automatically processed by tools?
>
> On 5/8/24 14:17, Jonathan Wright via devel wrote:
>
://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11720
On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 3:56 PM Leon Fauster via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Am 08.05.24 um 22:44 schrieb Jonathan Wright via devel:
> > I was having trouble finding the public key(s). I'll look more into
> > t
ils/raid/mdadm/
> [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/docs/kernel/pgpkeys.git/plain/keys
>
>
> On 5/8/24 09:34, Jonathan Wright via devel wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm preparing to update mdadm from 4.2 to 4.3 in rawhide. There are no
> > breaking changes and it&
rc.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mdadm/c/4220b6778150ef86a040bb65058beefd2771?branch=rawhide
Koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=117433046
I would greatly appreciate any feedback, testing, or even just a few extra
sets of eyes on the updates to the spec file.
Thanks
--
Jonat
Fedora Linux 40 was released today[1]. The Fedora CoreOS `testing`
stream has been rebased and is currently rolling out. In two weeks, it
will be promoted to the `stable` stream.
For more information about Fedora 40, see the Fedora Project’s list of
official Changes[2] and the Fedora CoreOS analys
air enough" if this was rawhide and we're working on the
> transition still, but this is stable Fedora, EPEL and user's data.
>
> cheers.
>
> --
> Nathan
>
>
--
Jonathan Wright
AlmaLinux Foundation
Mattermost: chat <https://chat.almalinux.org/almalinux/message
On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 9:43 AM Leon Fauster via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Am 17.04.24 um 15:59 schrieb Jonathan Wright via devel:
> > Valley 7.2.5 stable was released yesterday. Builds are in Bodhi and
> > ready for testing/feedback.
> >
> >
Valley 7.2.5 stable was released yesterday. Builds are in Bodhi and ready
for testing/feedback.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?search=valkey-7.2.5-1
On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 12:54 PM Jonathan Wright
wrote:
> Valkey 7.2.4 rc1 was released earlier today. Package review opened
GOA
fixed. The current FAS MFA is less than ideal, though you do get used to it.
--
Jonathan Steffan
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
com> wrote:
> So, valkey is then the one the AWS employee did.
>
> Thank you Jonathan for the work on this.
>
> On 3/28/24 11:13, Jonathan Wright via devel wrote:
> > This is the one previously known as "PlaceHolderKV".
> >
> > I forgot to mentio
rchives:
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Do not reply to spam, report it:
>> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>>
>
>
> --
> Iñaki Úcar
> --
> ____
On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 at 19:44, Richard Hughes wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 at 10:40, Aoife Moloney wrote:
> > Switch the default desktop experience for Workstation to KDE Plasma.
> > The GNOME desktop is moved to a separate spin / edition, retaining
> > release-blocking status.
>
> If this is an A
rchives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
--
Jonathan Wright
AlmaLinux Foundation
Mattermost: chat <https://chat.almalinux.org/almalinux/messages/@jonathan>
Linux Foundation.
>
>
> https://www.linuxfoundation.org/press/linux-foundation-launches-open-source-valkey-community
>
> It came out just today.
>
> On 3/23/24 11:35, Jonathan Wright via devel wrote:
> > KeyDB builds are in Bodhi and ready for testing for all Fedora versions
> &
org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_i
or now. KeyDB,
while slow, has at least published something. redict is totally unknown.
Maybe it gets a huge following, maybe it doesn't.
We don't have to make any rash decisions since the current versions of
redis are in good shape for the time being.
--
Jonathan Wright
Alma
of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
>
.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do
Is this all a misunderstanding?
https://redis.com/blog/redis-labs-modules-license-changes/ seems to claim
that redis-core which appears to cover redis-server and redis-sentinel will
remain BSD-3.
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 7:38 PM Jonathan Wright
wrote:
> DragonflyDB is not an option, they do
st/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
--
Jonathan Wright
AlmaLinux Foundation
Mattermost: chat <https://chat.almalinux.org/almalinux/messages/@jonathan>
--
___
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 5:29 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 6:26 PM Jonathan Wright via devel
> wrote:
> >
> > We can potentially look to https://github.com/Snapchat/KeyDB which I've
> been loosely working on packaging anyway.
> >
>
> I'l
/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
--
Jonathan Wright
On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 at 14:55, Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
>
> I have just found another essential feature that is missing in Plasma
> Wayland:
The big one for me is that Synergy and similar tools barrier and
input-leap don't work under Wayland. I don't see that mentioned at
https://community.kd
ncies
will allow, in the near future.
1. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-226fa082a4
2.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#_other_packages
--
Jonathan Wright
AlmaLinux Foundation
Mattermost: chat <https://chat.almalinux.org/almalinux/messa
Hi Zdenek,
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 4:58 AM Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> there was an issue (either due a bug or due design) in the past about
> RPM OSTree treating %post scriptlets in SPEC file differently than on
> Fedora Linux - IIUC the explanation was %post scriptlets were applied on
nes: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_is
On February 4, 2024 2:16:55 PM CST, Tom Seewald wrote:
>> On February 3, 2024 8:55:42 PM CST, Kevin Kofler via devel
>> >
>> Wait, you're banned from all the KDE channels in Fedora? I have no idea what
>> led to
>> that, though the KDE SIG doesn't have a track record of handing those kind
>>
On February 3, 2024 8:55:42 PM CST, Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
>Neal Gompa wrote:
>> It's extremely obvious that people want to use it. You replied to
>> someone who did and denigrated their opinion. Frankly, I'm
>> disappointed in your response as well as the tone of you and Kevin.
>
>I can
and drop X11 support. " KDE Plasma will
not offer an X11 session" That change was approved by FESCo. And from my
perspective running Fedora Rawhide and KDE 6, it looks great. We even
have HDR working! That's amazing! So let's go all in.
--Jonathan Bennett
--
_
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 at 13:03, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 4:16 AM Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 28 Jan 2024 at 15:18, Richard Shaw wrote:
>> >
>> > Well I upped the memory to 10GB and got it to build but the issue on i686
>>
On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 at 12:29, Florian Weimer wrote:
> In the past, this kind of problem would have just compiled and resulted
> in a run-time error when the Python extension module is loaded. In some
> cases, issues went completely unnoticed because the Python bindins were
> unused. But with GCC
On Sun, 28 Jan 2024 at 15:18, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> Well I upped the memory to 10GB and got it to build but the issue on i686
> with the wrong tbb package being pulled in has not been corrected by any of
> the 4 maintainers of the package.
I fixed tbb to stop installing tbb32.pc so the underl
On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 at 13:24, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 at 12:10, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> >
> > On Saturday, 20 January 2024 at 17:59, Tom Hughes via devel wrote:
> > > On 20/01/2024 16:07, Jerry James wrote:
>
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 at 12:10, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
>
> On Saturday, 20 January 2024 at 17:59, Tom Hughes via devel wrote:
> > On 20/01/2024 16:07, Jerry James wrote:
> >
> > > Upstream has this in src/tbb/CMakeLists.txt:
> > >
> > > if (CMAKE_SIZEOF_VOID_P EQUAL 8)
> > > set(T
ld[1].
CC Richard Shaw who was puzzled by the same thing.
> I’m posting about this in part just to explain the problem in case anyone
> else is encountering something similar.
>
> – Ben Beasley (FAS music)
>
> [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=111976337
&g
On Fri, 19 Jan 2024 at 01:27, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2024-01-19 at 00:21 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > On Fri, 19 Jan 2024 at 00:10, Jonathan Wakely
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 19:07, Jonathan Wakely
> > > wrote:
>
On Fri, 19 Jan 2024 at 00:10, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 19:07, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >
> > I'll be building boost, tbb, and the packages that depend on them in
> > the f40-build-side-81691
> > side tag over the next few hours (in a
On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 19:07, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> I'll be building boost, tbb, and the packages that depend on them in
> the f40-build-side-81691
> side tag over the next few hours (in advance of the mass rebuild tomorrow).
>
> If your package gets a "Rebui
On Thu, 18 Jan 2024 at 22:15, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> heaptrack
> Could NOT find Libunwind (missing: LIBUNWIND_HAS_UNW_BACKTRACE)
This one's already fixed in dist-git! (thanks, aleasto)
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedorapro
On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 19:07, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> I'll be building boost, tbb, and the packages that depend on them in
> the f40-build-side-81691
> side tag over the next few hours (in advance of the mass rebuild tomorrow).
>
> If your package gets a "Rebui
On Thu, 18 Jan 2024 at 06:43, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
>
> Brad Bell wrote on 2024/01/18 14:00:
> > I got the Result in the subject above for the following build:
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=111912575
> >
> > Looking at the corresponding root.log
> > https://kojipkgs.fedora
I'll be building boost, tbb, and the packages that depend on them in
the f40-build-side-81691
side tag over the next few hours (in advance of the mass rebuild tomorrow).
If your package gets a "Rebuilt for Boost 1.83.0" comment, please
don't rebuild it in rawhide, we're building it in the side tag
Text Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-01-17/fedora-coreos-meeting.2024-01-17-16.29.log.txt
HTML Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-01-17/fedora-coreos-meeting.2024-01-17-16.29.log.html
Text Minutes:
https:/
Mark,
You likely just need to scrub mock to clean out the dnf4 based bootstrap. A
fresh one with dnf5 will be automatically downloaded.
mock --scrub=all
--
Jonathan Steffan
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
On Mon, 11 Dec 2023 at 12:03, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 at 18:47, Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2023-12-08 at 10:38 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > I'm definitely in favor. I hit this broken step a while back myself. ;
On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 at 18:47, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2023-12-08 at 10:38 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > I'm definitely in favor. I hit this broken step a while back myself. ;(
> >
> > Hopefully the current maintainers are on board with this?
>
> Yeah, honestly, I'm not sure a Change is t
Today I learned (the hard way) that Fedora's mailx package (aka
Heirloom mailx) is ancient and buggy. Upstream has been dead for over
a decade and features documented in its man page don't work. The good
news is that Fedora (and RHEL and CentOS) already have s-nail, which
was forked from it ages ag
ning my existing
packages.
Where I have felt the process lacks is automated coordination with the
package maintainers.
--
Jonathan Steffan
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --scrub=bootstrap did the trick. Thank you!
On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 9:27 AM Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 4:09 PM Jonathan Wright via devel <
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
>> Erm, I do already have dnf5 present
Erm, I do already have dnf5 present within my f39 install where I was
trying to run the mockbuild.
$ which /usr/bin/dnf5
/usr/bin/dnf5
Any ideas as to the cause of the error?
On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 9:06 AM Jonathan Wright
wrote:
> This is awesome!
>
> I grabbed the RPM and then att
t.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/
ect.org/rpms/
>
> > python-ironicclient apevec, openstack-sig, orphan0
> weeks ago
>
> I was going to take ironicclient, but it looks like it is no longer
> an orphan. But jonathanspw already has 734 packages. Is everything okay
> down there?
>
> -- P
>
&
On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 at 12:17, Ian McInerney via devel
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 11:59 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> Recently, one of the folks working on packaging stuff in Fedora KDE
>> nearly missed an issue caused by GCC emitting a warning about missing
>> include dirs
This seems like a reasonable default. Does it also make sense to add some
CLI UI niceties that:
* Let's the user know this check may be skipped with "--nogpgcheck" with a
brief explanation of the risk
* Allow the user to continue the transaction with only t
On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 at 14:26, Aoife Moloney wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> Sorry this (among other things Im sure) fell through the cracks while we
> were without a Fedora Program Manager :(
>
Yep, completely understandable. It wouldn't have been a problem if I had
started th
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 02:21:38PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> Yes, exactly. We have no idea if this will be picked up again (either by
> trodgers or by somebody else), so it seems better to drop it than to pretend
> that we expect it to happen for F40.
Well I had said publicly I was work
On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 at 14:24, Ian McInerney via devel
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 2:06 PM Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>
>> Well it looks like I took too long to do the deferral to F40, and so
>> FESCO dropped the change:
>> https://pagure.io/fesco/issue
PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 2:56 PM Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > >
> > > This change got approved for f39 but couldn't be done in time:
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F39ModernizeTBB
> > >
> > > Do
de of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
&
code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagu
x27;s such a useful software package it would be a
shame to drop it.
I would also be willing to co-maintain this package, but the current
package admin has not been responsive to other requests.
--
Jonathan Steffan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists
;t say
3.12 in requirements.txt anymore, but 3.20.
--
Jonathan
Am 07.09.23 um 13:58 schrieb Ben Beasley:
It looks like the Electrum build is currently blocked not by protobuf,
but by the failure of python-qdarkstyle to rebuild for Python
3.12[1][2]. That dependency is also currently orphaned.
Grepp
Fedora Linux 39 Beta was released today [1]. Our Fedora CoreOS `next` stream
has been migrated to Fedora Linux 39 content. Existing nodes on the `next`
stream will update as normal over the following days.
The Fedora Project accepted changes for Fedora 39 are at [2] and the Fedora
CoreOS analysis
1 - 100 of 1017 matches
Mail list logo
